User talk:Pabmeista


 * 1) User:Pabmeista/My Articals

Help requests
Hi there.

Regarding your help requests on Talk:Ardwick Athletic F.C


 * Firstly, in future, please use here, on your own page - and you only need one of them. Please try to give a specific question.


 * To get you going, I will add a 'welcome' message here, and some other stuff about references.


 * The biggest problem with the article (and the reason it might get deleted) is, it lacks references. In order to have an article on Wikipedia, the subject must meet the notability guidelines. The simplest, most important one is the general notability guideline, which says a subject needs significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. That carefully-worded phrase means that it needs refs to e.g. newspapers, books, or something. I will add help on how to make references on this page.


 * The article also lacks a lead section, called a lede. Please read that link; the first part, before the first section heading, should explain the context of the article - what it is all about. It should start with the article name in bold, ie something like this;

Gorton A.F.C. was an English football team from east Manchester active in the 1880s.


 * That will look like this;

Gorton A.F.C. was an English football team from east Manchester active in the 1880s.


 * The stuff in square brackets are wikilinks to other articles, and these need adding throughout the article, to link to other appropriate articles.


 * Please read WP:FIRST.


 * The following 'welcome' should really help; make the 'test page' and play around there.


 * For more help, you can either;


 * Leave a message on my own talk page;
 * Use a - please create a new section at the end of your own talk page, put , and ask your question - remember to 'sign' your name by putting ~ at the end;
 * Talk to us live, with this or this.


 * Best wishes,  Chzz  ►  22:09, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Welcome and introduction
Hi, Pabmeista. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  22:09, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Simple references
These require two parts;


 * a)

Chzz is 98 years old.

He likes tea.


 * b) A section called "References" with the special code " ";

Named references
Chzz was born in 1837, in Footown.

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates
You can put anything you like between, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals.

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Talkback
 Chzz  ►  07:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Real Madrid Castilla
I love all you Wikipedia editors! Why did you changed Real Madrid Castilla? That is the official and legal name for the team because they had played in the Segunda after the edit of banning unique club names for reserve teams. Only three teams have the right to have different name from the parent club: Real Madrid C.F., Sevilla FC and CA Osasuna's reserve teams. The reserve teams of Athletic, Barcelona, Elche, Las Palmas, Malaga, Murcia, Ovideo, Salamanca and Valencia do not have the right, but are allow to use their unique names. I think that if change Madrid, then all should change. Thank you.

Raul17 (talk) 19:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Typ932 T&middot;C 20:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Cineha.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cineha.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 14:30, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Ardwick Athletic F.C kit

 * I'm not sure how you expect an admin to be able to help you with that. --Closedmouth (talk) 14:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

REPLY: I Know what they should look like but i cant get them to work User:Pabmeista|Pabsko-One 10:37, 5 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pabmeista (talk • contribs)

I have moved this from Talk:Ardwick Athletic F.C.


 * Please use and  here, on your own talk page, and not on the article talk page.

When you leave messages, please remember to "sign" your name, by putting ~ (four tilde signs) at the end. This will add your name, and the date and time. You can also do this by clicking the 'sign' button, pictured here.
 * [[Image:Signature button.png|right]]


 * Please do not use adminhelp unless you actually require an administrator; in this case, a normal would be fine.


 * An example of how to fill in the football kit fields is given in Template:Football club infobox. For further examples, you could just look at other football club articles, edit them, and see how it is done - e.g. A.F.C. Sudbury –Aberdeen F.C. –Andover F.C. –Birmingham City F.C. –Bristol Rovers F.C. –Dundee United F.C. –FC Bayern Munich –Juventus F.C.

The relevant portion of the code is this;


 * kit_alt1  = Red jersey with white sleeves, white shorts, white socks
 * pattern_la1= |pattern_b1= |pattern_ra1=
 * leftarm1=FFFFFF |body1=DD0000 |rightarm1=FFFFFF |shorts1=FFFFFF |socks1=FFFFFF

The colours are specified using HTML colour-codes, which are in hexadecimal; there are lots of colour-charts on the internet, for example, here.

I hope this helps; if you need more help, please ask again, but please be as specific as possible about your requirements.  Chzz  ►  12:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

 Chzz  ►  22:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Moving pages without discussion
I've explained before why articles are named the way they are, and why they shouldn't be moved without discussing it first. I see this is the second time you've moved Real Madrid Castilla from its proper name. Please stop doing it. Struway2 (talk) 23:43, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

¿Confusion over Real Madrid Castilla?
Dude, I need to read your reasons for changing the Real Madrid Castilla article. Raul17 (talk) 00:28, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Belgium Netherlands 20182022bid.gif
Pabmeista, I don't understand why you reverted File:Belgium Netherlands 20182022bid.gif to a smaller, older version. I believe the newer one was still small enough for fair use and all. It's just that on the 2018 and 2022 FIFA World Cup bids article, it becomes noticeably smaller than the other logos, since they're all presented together. Just curious.-- Patrick {o Ѻ ∞} 01:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

a user requested to make it smaller to comply with the copyright rules of belgium, because thats were it was designed


 * Well, that would surprise me about Beglian law, and I don't see where that request occurred. Moving on, I don't think the version of the Indonesian bid logo you created is legitimate. It appears to take the text of the logo we got from FIFA and use it in this other logo, for which I can't find a source. The one from the FIFA video seems to look like all the other bid logos, with the national federation logo and the bid design side-by-side, so I suspect that is legitimate. The only one were missing in good quality is the South Korean logo, so if you do see on of those please point it out.-- Patrick {o Ѻ ∞} 19:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

seeming as it was on the Federation Nationale Soccer Americas website i would say it was real

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Louis Paterson
A tag has been placed on Paul Louis Paterson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Gavia immer (talk) 04:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 09:15, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of London City F.C


The article London City F.C has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No such club in league mentioned. Either a blatant hoax/test page, or a non-notable Sunday League team with ideas above its station.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Struway2 (talk) 09:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of London City F.C
An article that you have been involved in editing, London City F.C, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:File-Kolo Touré 5.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:File-Kolo Touré 5.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:38, 16 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:38, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ardwick Athletic F.C.
An article that you have been involved in editing, Ardwick Athletic F.C., has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:22, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for deletion
The London City article is up for deletion because the information in it is blatantly false, there is no such team in Conference South as I'm sure you're aware. The Ardwick one is up for deletion because Man City were never known as Ardwick Athletic, they were known as Ardwick, but that is already covered in the main club article and the history of the club article, a separate standalone article is not needed. Plus the content was copied and pasted from our article on Hyde Road, which is not permitted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:39, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Hyde Road has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  Anna Lincoln  11:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User:Gogo Dodo. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Anna Lincoln  11:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Anna Lincoln. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Anna Lincoln  11:15, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

- its called sending u a message, so stop undoing my edits!

Adoption
Greetings , I see you're up for adoption, and I'm in the market. If ever you need advice or answers, just ask me -- any question, any time. I'd like to help however I can.

You seem to have requested adoption from User:Anizilla. You're welcome to wait for a response from him/her you want, but they seem to edit only once every few months, and haven't edited since August. It could be a long wait. Either way, cheers - Draeco (talk) 16:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/The One & Only Fools and Horses for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. pablo hablo. 19:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been. (blocked by MuZemike 19:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC))

You may contest this block by adding the text below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

RfD nomination of User:Pabmeista/AntTyler DrWho
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. pablo hablo. 22:01, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of User:Pabmeista/Barclaycard
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. pablo hablo. 22:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Londoncity.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Londoncity.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Non Free Images in your User Space
Hey there Pabmeista, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:Pabmeista/TRASH-Experements/Edit to FIFA bidding 2018 (NUMBER 2). In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:US-2020Bid.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:US-2020Bid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:01, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Nachopopcorn wth dip.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nachopopcorn wth dip.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 21:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Footballer~.jpg


The file File:Footballer~.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 December 2019 (UTC)