User talk:Pabmusic

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

You may be interested in some of the WikiProjects about music: WPP:MUSIC gives a list. Regards, BencherliteTalk 22:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Butterworth_2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Butterworth_2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

I have removed the picture until this can be sorted out. I suspect I classified it wrongly anyway. Thank you.Pabmusic (talk) 02:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC) I did classify it wrongly. It was first published in the George Butterworth Memorial Volume in the UK in 1918. I have amended the details accordingly.Pabmusic (talk) 02:31, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to And did those feet in ancient time. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. ''Great edits, you obviously know your stuff! Thanks.'' ukexpat (talk) 14:23, 17 June 2011 (UTC) Thank you - I shall do soPabmusic (talk) 22:29, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Willow 3.pdf
Thanks for uploading File:Willow 3.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Willow 2.pdf
Thanks for uploading File:Willow 2.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:07, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Sorry to have to do this
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; you are welcome to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:08, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I do not understand what you have done or why you've done it. My user name is surely not offensive. It represents one person only (me), but you surely are aware of that from my registration. Can you please tell me what the problem is? My name is Phillip Andrew Brookes and I write mainly about music - hence PabmusicPabmusic (talk) 15:45, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Another editor pointed out that it seems to be the name of a commercial website, one to which you seem to be affiliated. As such, it can be seen as advertising for said website. Are you saying you have no connection to that website? -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * When answering the above question, please bear in mind that your name, as quoted above by you, is mentioned on the website. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh I see. I do have a website, only partly built, called pabmusic.com. It is about music and is not primarily commercial, but it does offer my services to any professional group as a writer of programmes notes. For amateur groups it gives free permission to use my writings as they wish; this is clear from the site. In fact, I have never had any commissions at all. I have used the name Pabmusic for many years to mark my own copyright on any music I have composed or arranged. I have only once had any commercial use out of this: in 2002 the BBC recorded some music by Parry that I had edited. That is referred to on the home page of my website, but it is not relevant to anything I've ever posted on yours. I hold no interest in any commercial organisation otherwise. I was always an amateur musician. I inserted a link to my website as it seemed relevant in a list of George Butterworth's music.

I worked as a Governor grade in the prison service, but In 2008 I suffered a brain haemorrhage and had to retire. I have only recently (within the last year) been able to use my computer successfully again and I have spent some of that time building my website. When I discovered Wikipaedia, I found this a constructive way to use my (considerable) musical knowledge, and I have since added a lat of good information backed up with citations, but I do find Wikipaedia very complicated to use, especially since the mechanical side of my brain doesn't function so well. In these circumstances I'm happy to back-track on anything so as to conform with your rules. Please advise me what I should do. Remove any link to my website? Change my username? (I really don't want to do the last if it's at all possible because I have trouble remembering recent events, like new passwords.) Please advise.Pabmusic (talk) 23:57, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I would advise a username change - to something else you can easily remember. Keep all association with pabmusic out of it - and preferably don't link to it anywhere as that can be regarded as spam (even if not actually commercial). Password can be the same if you want - I know from a case in my family about the after-effects of brain haemorrhage and know that memory can be affected for a long time. If you're agreeable to that, I'm agreeable to unblocking you for a name change. We could do with people in your branch of music. Peridon (talk) 11:00, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I second everything Peridon has said, especially about our desire not to lose folks like you from the project. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  13:38, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for this. Yes, I’ll change my name to something I can remember. Please tell me what I need to do now.Pabmusic (talk) 03:10, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Willow 2.pdf
Thank you for uploading File:Willow 2.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:Willow.pdf
A file that you uploaded, File:Willow.pdf, has been listed in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion because it is not an image, sound or video file and does not appear to have any encyclopedic use. See section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you feel that this file has a use in the encyclopedia, please place the hangon tag on File:Willow.pdf, then go to its talk page (by clicking Discussion at the top of that page) and insert an explanation of how the file is useful to the encyclopedia. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of File:Willow 3.pdf


The file File:Willow 3.pdf has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused; no apparent use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Pbrks (t • c) 20:23, 18 February 2022 (UTC)