User talk:Pabs 1994

Speedy deletion nomination of Billie Piper / Jimmy Osmond Confusion
A tag has been placed on Billie Piper / Jimmy Osmond Confusion, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rorshacma (talk) 23:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Billie Piper / Jimmy Osmond Charting Confusion


The article Billie Piper / Jimmy Osmond Charting Confusion has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * details appropriate to the individual articles but not appropriate for a separate article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 00:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)