User talk:PacificSeaInvests

Speedy deletion nomination of 12bet


A tag has been placed on 12bet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you will probably not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

--PacificSeaInvests (talk) 04:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Here are a few key questions:
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

-


 * Yes for all of the questions, That is why this request for new username was submitted, "ContCheck" to always remind the checking of the content, the cases and violations that maybe made. In the case of promoting, as it was said, there are no purposes of promotion, the content for the page that was made was still on the process of revisions, and if we are going to compare it also to other pages like 188BET, it's like on the same level, that would be unfair if it would be deleted. And for the username policy, It was not intentionally made, New users do always commit mistakes and we all know about it, Pros were once a newbie, mistakes do still have rooms for "correction" and "changes". Again, that is why this request was submitted.

Still hoping for your consideration. Thanks! --PacificSeaInvests (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is not a valid reason to prevent deletion - you read Wikipedia's policies when you signed up, yet you still promoted an entity right away. You're now arguing that that WP:SPAM should remain, and I suppose that you expect to be able to continue editing that article if you're permitted to change usernames (as the founder of Wikipedia says, those with WP:COI should never edit the article - they should only suggest changes on its talkpage).  I'm not convinced that you understand the problems overall, and thus am only commenting on this unblock rather than acting on it (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 10:37, 20 April 2013 (UTC)