User talk:PacoPaletta

You seem to have a personal interest in creating the link you keep re-adding to Ten-code. Wikipedia is not an advertising platform for your website. Please see WP:EL for a guide on adding external links. At the very least you need to provide some context and a third-party reference that backs up how your link is relevant to the article, and not just link spam. Just because your website's domain is "10-4 dot something" doesn't make it relevant.

--Craig (t|c) 10:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

spam - lapsus linguae
I would like you to recognize, that the line and link you keep deleting are refering to a concrete reality that wikipedia it self (and most people refering to things they have no knowledge of) barely meets. Aknowledging real events, real intentions, with no benefit in mind, is not spam. No more than promoting your own views. Next thing fluxus disapears, because of someone thinking in another galaxy. Maybe you don't need twenty years to aknowledge, especially on the brink of life But enlight me if you think it is more appropriate with a definitive retrospective view Entiendes lo que estoy disciendo?

September 2017
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Ten-code. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --David Biddulph (talk) 23:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

PacoPaletta (talk) 17:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC) Dear "David", I am new to editing in Wikipedia, but cannot understand, how presenting the fact, that 10-4 has been introduced to a new meaning and reference as a conceptual art event in Copenhagen can be considered as spam. But I see that naming 10-4.space automatically creates an external link. Which in my view is quite ok, as this is an easy way to make a reference. So.. What is all this deleting, ranking and threats about blocking me from editing about? Searching for 10-4 on wikipedia lands you on ten-codes. In my opinion, 10-4 is not so much about ten codes, from where it has derived, as a way of saying ok. like 22 similarly in french means "watch out" usually in the context of police coming, but later extended, although this is completely absent on wikipedia. Is it relevant? should I write an article about 22, but would you then allow me to add a link to "22 allo poulet"? So there is a quite big flaw about the whole ten codes article it self, which in my view should be entirely reorganised, so that 10-4 gets an article on its own. But maybe it's a bit to much? I will wait a couple of weeks for your comment before re-editing.