User talk:Pacolesa

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pacolesa/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Pacolesa/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodger67&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Pacolesa/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...About four months ago, when I started my post, I was asked to show verifiable proofs of legitimacy, which I did send, and it was approved by Wikipedia:

The Ultimate Goal, title by the author´s book, was published by OutskirtsPress.com (Juvenile/Nonfiction School&Education / ISBN 978-1-4327-5844-8 COPYRIGHT 2010 Francisco Guerrero.

Thank you, and congratulations on your service to the world community!Pacolesa (talk) 15:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Pacolesa (talk) 15:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello Pacolesa. I've reviewed your contributions and I could not find where you sent your reliable sources. I should note that the advice given to you at User:Pacolesa/sandbox was not to find proof of legitimacy. The reviewing editor said you need to provide references. I would suggest you carefully read WP:FIRSTARTICLE. There are a number of things a new article requires. First and foremost it needs to meet our guidelines on notability. Just because something exists or has even been published, does not necessarily mean it should have its own article here on the English Wikipedia. The way we establish this is by demonstrating that multiple independent publications have discussed the topic or individual in depth. In depth meaning beyond routine coverage in a category and where the topic has been the central aspect of the coverage (no passing mentions). Secondly, all the information in the article should be supported by inline references. Essentially every fact or statement in the article should be able to be verified by other sources. For example, the draft you submitted states the individual has "8 children, and 16 grand children". You will need to provide an inline reference to support that statement. These inline statements will need to be formatted in the correct way. I've already given you quite a bit of reading material to look over. If you require any further help, you can ask questions at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Mkdw talk 16:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)