User talk:Paddymurphy

Re: deletion question

 * Hi Gurch,


 * Can I ask you why the page on simchronise had been deleted and the talk about the deletion ignored or no longer availlable? I thought a talk was two ways. am I missing something in the process? What criteria have you used before deciding to delete it?


 * I do not get how a number of companies I see in wikipedia are not submitted for deletion when this company which is completely relevant to its industry is speedy deleted for blatant advertising.


 * Can you explain what was blatant advertising in the simchronise article?


 * Sorry if it sounds a bit straight forward, but I'd like to understand.


 * Cheers for your feedback


 * Paddy


 * Paddymurphy

Hi. Sorry for misinterpreting your intentions if the article was not an attempt at advertising. However, if you do recreate it there may still be notability concerns. It would be impractical for Wikipedia to attempt to cover every organization in existence in an encyclopediaic manner, so certain guidelines for inclusion apply, whether or not the article reads like an advertisement. See here for these guidelines. You are welcome to re-create the article if you feel it meets these guidelines and you re-write it to avoid giving the impression of an advertisement (see guidelines here for advice on how to do this). Thank you – Gurch 21:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback Gurch Paddy