User talk:Padgriffin/Archive March 2014- March 2017

Hong Kong Police Page

Justin: what is your problem with my edits to the HKP page? If you keep reversing my edits, I shall lodge a vandalism complaint to Wikipedia. Please try and be constructive. I'm going to add citations to justify my edits but please explain, what is your beef with the following paragraphs?

Corruption started to tarnish the reputation of the Hong Kong Police after the Second World War when some of its poorly paid officers would accept bribes to turn a blind eye to syndicated vice, drugs and gambling activities. This became an increasing concern for the colonial government but was overshadowed by the leftist violence and riots that beset Hong Kong in 1967, threatening the stability and prospects of the British colony. In 1969, Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II honoured the force with the title 'Royal' to recognize its loyalty, dedication and efforts to restore law and order during the riots of 1967. It was thus that the force became known as the Royal Hong Kong Police.

Although not confined to the police but tarnishing other government departments and the wider business community as well, police corruption became a major concern in 1973 when a highly decorated officer, Chief Superintendent Peter Godber, was embroiled in a corruption scandal when it was found that he had amassed HK$4.3 million. The government therefore formed the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in 1974, giving it wide-ranging powers to investigate and bring to justice corrupt elements in Hong Kong society.

After Godber's conviction, the ICAC focused its efforts on the police, mounting a series of raids on police stations throughout the colony, sometimes bringing lorry loads of officers to the ICAC headquarters for investigation. Police discontent with this situation peaked in 1977 and the government offered an amnesty to all serving officers after junior police officers gathered to protest at the Police Headquarters in Wanchai and the ICAC offices near Admiralty.

Following the amnesty, the police force re-organised itself, introducing new layers of management, police procedures and supervisory accountability to deter and detect corrupt elements within its ranks. The government also disincentivised motives for corruption by greatly improving the pay and the terms and conditions of service of all police officers.

Resulting from the reforms of 1979 and the early 1980s, the Royal Hong Kong Police regained its good name and reputation, becoming known as Asia's Finest. It developed a strong track record for fighting crime, and enjoyed the reputation of being one of the most professional, efficient, honest and impartial police forces in the Asia Pacific region.[14][15] The force enjoyed the esteem and confidence of the public it served, as demonstrated by the University of Hong Kong opinion polls between 1997 and 2007. Its popularity peaked in 2007 with a net approval rating of 79 percentage points.[16]

Thannk you! --Stoatmonster (talk) 09:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Justin, I think you made a mistake. Toast sandwiches are the way to become a millionaire - frugality is key. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:440C:1416:4600:807:F812:58E8:796C (talk) 09:44, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Welcome
 Hello Clubjustin4, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Clubjustin4, good luck, and have fun. – Pam  D  10:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

202.140.101.40 (talk) 11:39, 13 December 2014 (UTo

Unsigned (Kranthi4u) (edited)
Hi Clubjustin4,

Can you please look into the page that i created and make the modifications to it if required. I am new to creating wiki pages, so please excuse me if there are any mistakes in my listing.

Thanks,Kranthi4u

Stubs
Please take care not to waste other editors' time by addingstub to an article which already has a specific stub tag. And please also note that stub tags go right at the end, after references etc, per WP:ORDER. Thanks. Pam D  10:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC) Thanks,I wasn't familiar with the stub tag will read up that policy next morning on an IP.Clubjustin4 (talk) 12:53, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

New Page Patrol
Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm but  with  only  147  edits please do  not  patrol  new pages until  you  have significantly more experience. If you would like to  help  maintain  the quality  of the encyclopedia, as soon  as you  have made 200 edits to  mainspace you will  qualify  to  enroll  at the WP:CVUA to  learn about counter vandalism. Anti-vandalism work requires a much lower threshold of knowledge of policies and guidelines than NPP, but  is nevertheless very  important. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Thx, but i have a hobby of watching policies on IPs so I have enough knowledge. Will get to 200 edits though.Clubjustin4 (talk) 10:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

test
This is clubjustin3 logged out. Just wanted to check my IP's edit log.168.70.61.67 (talk) 11:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Traffic enforcement camera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Langham Place. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Clubjustin4. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! &mdash; kikichugirl  speak up! 08:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Division
Hi, Clubjustin4, 'Division (military)' was enumerated twice in the article Division, that's why I removed the line in 'Other Uses' section. Regards, Tykyheg (talk) 13:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello
Hello master, wonder if can have custom sig like other 'Zillas? Justinzilla (talk) 11:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

No, not until I give User:Clubjustin3 a custom sig. Clubjustin3 (talk) 11:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Ahh, much better! Clubjustin3 (Sock) (talk) 11:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Dang it! 'Zilla, mind a copy 'n paste of Bishzilla's sig? Clubjustin3 (talk) 11:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Imitation sincere flattery. Feel free copy handsome 'zilla sig and welcome in pocket! bishzilla   ROA R R! ! 11:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC).

Yes!ROARRRR!Justinzilla <i style="color:#S0E;font-size:175%;">  ROA R R! !</i> 12:24, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Mariana Trench
For my edit, please see the edit summary. Your "without explaining why" for removal is an incorrect statement! There was no life down the Mariana Trench, but within the same expedition, days before at something called Britains Trench, 1800 Miles or so south-eastish. The single source is ok idea of Wikipedia occasionally has severe limits. Journalistic would be two bona fide sources. Cheers, 115.69.63.229 (talk) 12:26, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * This source backs up the BBC source. Mikenorton (talk) 13:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

So,why do this on my user talk page? Clubjustin3 (talk) 13:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Wrong warning message
Changing genres? --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 05:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC) Hmmmm.... Twinkle error? Clubjustin3 (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Your replies on my talk page
Hi, I appreciate your assistance with my talk page, but you reverted a perfectly good-faith removal of the AfC template (an edit summary was even provided!) that I was going to remove anyway. Additionally, while my talk page is pretty busy, it's probably best if the AfC questions are left to an experienced AfC reviewer. ("try writing it with less POV" isn't particularly helpful if one doesn't know what POV stands for, or know the rules about NPOV). As you do not have sufficient article edits to become such at the moment, I'd rather not risk confusing the newbies. Thanks for your understanding! &mdash; kikichugirl  oh hello! 20:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Oh!thanks!Clubjustin3 (talk) 08:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Stop
Like I said beforehand, stop reverting my edits as your bot is malfunctioning, and if it infact not a bot and is infact yourself, you are griefing and if you continue to do so I will report you as well as your threat on my talk page. 24.190.48.162 (talk) 02:24, 18 April 2015 (UTC) Please, Remember that no personal attacks are allowed on this wiki. Clubjustin3 (talk) 02:30, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello Clubjustin4,

Thank you for taking time to look over my changes made to the Women in Hong Kong page. I just wanted to notify you that I have reverted your edits, as much of the information I obtained to put in this page is from other researched wikipedia pages that are linked to the subject. I have also carefully researched additional information.

Edit to William Langewiesche article
Howdy, I edited a portion of the William Langewiesche entry and you reverted the edits; per your request I wanted to explain my concerns.

As it stands, more than half of the "Career" section of the entry is devoted to a discussion of one article, a critical article Mr. Langewiesche wrote about Chevron. This seems like disproportionate emphasis, given the subject's long career as a journalist (see, e.g., the "Awards" and "Bibliography" sections of the entry). I'm only an occasional, unregistered, editor here, so I defer to the community on this. But, while I don't see why there shouldn't be some mention of this possible controversy in the entry, it seems wildly out of proportion for most of the entry to focus on it. Especially given that it's all attributed to one source, without any broader sourcing to explain why this is such a prominent aspect of the subject's life and career.

I'd appreciate your suggestions on how/if the entry could be revised and improved to mention this article and the surrounding controversy more concisely, in proportion to its actual importance (both in general and in relation to the subject's life and career). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:326F:ABC0:FDE7:EB8A:8569:3DD2 (talk) 05:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Sandbox
Why you giving 72.244.206.210 a warning? testing in the sandbox is allowed. refering to the sandbox while he is already there is a bit strange(excuse my bad english) --Lukasz - Discussion 07:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your help
Thank you for your help in keeping Don Lane (Santa Cruz)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Lane_%28Santa_Cruz%29 honest and as negotiated on October 15 2014. They have added this sentence: "The following paragraph was written by a political opponent of Lane who has decided to take up 25 percent of Lane's biography with his obsession with a minor event from more than 25 years ago that is not accurately described. The references cited do not actually verify all of the contents of this paragraph:"  which is patently untrue. I am not the political opponent they are referring to though I do oppose many of Lane's policies and decisions. I have added this after the above inserted sentence: "The previous sentence is not true as evidenced by the following links and direct quotes."

It's funny how Don Lane and his team are so upset about this episode that they lie about it. It's also funny that Don Lane refers to it in a jokingly condescending manner in a recent fluff piece about him in a local paper: http://www.gtweekly.com/index.php/santa-cruz-news/santa-cruz-local-news/6203-on-his-terms.html

Again, thanks for your help and diligence on this page. Let's keep it up! The Man of Heart (talk) 13:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment This isn't how content disputes are dealt with on BLPs. 3RR notices issued, temp semi protection requested. Take it to Talk:Don Lane (Santa Cruz). Keri (talk) 13:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

A Little Help?
Apparently I've been flagged as to be in an Edit War at Don Lane (Santa Cruz). If you have the time and interest, would you comment on the Article's Talk Page? Thanks, The Man of Heart (talk) 17:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Don_Lane_%28Santa_Cruz%29

Speedy tagging of userpage
You tagged a userpage as it appeared in this state under WP:G11. Could you please explain? Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:14, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Hm... I swear I used A7... Twinkle error? Again? Clubjustin (talk) 09:19, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * That would also have been inappropriate. A7 is for articles. Plus, the content he has there is okay per WP:UPYES. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:22, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

You also speedy tagged a userpage in this state under WP:G1.

Please read WP:UPYES.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:20, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Ok,OK. I think I messed up..Clubjustin (talk) 09:27, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * No worries. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:05, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia
Thanks for welcoming me to Wikipedia and encouraging me to learn the ropes. I hope you'll review my thousands of edits over the past decade. --Stybn (talk) 04:37, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Oh the sarcasm...... I blame twinkle.Clubjustin (talk) 07:46, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Bartlett and Robertson
I asked for help. You removed the request and didn't fix the problem. I'm putting it back. <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 15:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Ummm, you should ask for admin help for that. And that is for userpages. Clubjustin (talk) 15:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I just want the problem to be fixed. In context the problem is self evident.  If you can't (or won't) do it, removing the request doesn't solve the issue.  Sorry, I put in the wrong link.  If you leave it, somebodyh will fix it.  I've successfully used the strategy many times.  Thanks for your input.  <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 15:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It got fixed. Cheers.  <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 15:26, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined
User sandboxes like this one are not eligible for speedy deletion as nonsense. Thanks. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit on al bin ali wiki page
Hello, I would just like to inform you that this Wikipedia page may have been edited in the past to present false information in order to change the preception/image of a person(s) therefore i have descovered this and attemted to rectify it. I would appreciare it if you allowed me to rectify this page. Cena8979 (talk) 12:49, 17 March 2016 (UTC) Excuse me, but Wikipedia is meant to be a wiki, so no hoaxes here. Clubjustin (talk) 12:51, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism
Kindly keep your April foolery out of the article namespace and other reader-facing pages. If an edit is vandalism on March 31 or April 2, it's vandalism today too. Consider this a friendly warning. —David Levy 01:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Pfft... Fine. Can I atleast use CSDS? Clubjustin (talk) 01:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * In what manner? —David Levy 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Jokes you silly! BTW, messing with Jimbo and Ten's Userpages have been done before.
 * Also CSDing Earth. Clubjustin (talk) 02:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * "The page has been vandalised before" is not a valid excuse. Some silliness is tolerated on April Fools' Day, but it's long been agreed that reader-facing pages (especially articles) are off-limits.  I was about to point you to Rules for Fools, but I see that you  (and knew perfectly well that you were committing vandalism).  This is unacceptable.  —David Levy 02:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Fine. I'm going to restrain to my Userpage(s) Clubjustin (talk) 02:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm still going to have some joking today. Justinzilla, ATTACK! Clubjustin (talk) 02:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Picks Up little User:David Levy and eats him as little snack* Dat Was good! <b style="font-family:comic sans ms;font-size:125%;color:#Ffff0">Justinzilla</b> <i style="color:#S0E;font-size:175%;">  ROA R R! !</i> 02:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Minnie M. Oakley
Please rescind your attack on my freshly made and still being developed page. It has every relevance to Library History, and is still in progress, even while you are reporting it.

Thanks, McDermott — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmmcderm (talk • contribs) 14:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks. You too!Clubjustin (talk) 06:12, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Lastkingkoby
I think you meant 'fails A7' not G7... Peridon (talk) 11:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC) Opps, thanks! Clubjustin (talk) 09:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Clubjustin4. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 11:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.
 * OMG. Thank you very much. Clubjustin (talk) 11:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

And BTW, Could you add Justinzilla to rollbackers too? It's my pub alt account. (No bad felling if you don't) Clubjustin (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Divine Truth
Hi Clubjustin4, may I ask why you reverted my additions to the Divine Truth article as you did not leave a summary explaining the reason?

Thanks.

Kind regards, Troy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.121.219.140 (talk) 23:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

YUL page
First, who are you to take such a decision to banned someone? Second, I may be one of the guys out there who knows the airport the most so when I am editing, I'm doing it right and never for nothing. And you, do you know the airport? Obviously no because you'll never let such info there. A and C are just letters designating the check-point use to access either the domestic, us or int'l jetty. More then that, domestic is accessible by A as well as int'l, and the guys who update it before was thinking only int'l was A. So you see, I am not a disruptive person as you said.

Last but not least, can who cite me one more time that I was disruptive according to you? Be carefull when you told something to someone, you are not fair.

Thank you for your comprehension. WoWowYUL (talk) 13:10, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you atleast have any citations? Clubjustin (talk) 13:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Just make a quick search on the ADM website and you'll see be yourself... That's something basic, any airplanes geeks from Montreal can tell you this... WoWowYUL (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Sigh... I'm in Hong Kong, China, Halfway across the globe. How on earth am I going to find any airplane geeks from Montreal? Please atleast cite things. Clubjustin (talk) 15:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, WoWowYUL, this guy ClubJustin changes articles arbitrarily without a care in the world. I wouldn't worry about it. I've spoken to a few Wiki admins/sysops and this guy is not taken seriously at all. Forget him. 2.121.219.140 (talk) 21:29, 1 May 2016 (UTC) Troy
 * Hey Troy, just a quick mention That personal attacks are NOT allowed.Clubjustin (talk) 04:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * BTW, I just read through your contributions. Please give me proof if you even spoke to a admin at ALL. Also, as you can see from my block log and the message from Wldr above, at least 2 admins take me seriously. (And Bish takes me semi-seriously, but heck), so please stop just because I reverted you. Also, to YUL, the block part is from the template. Sorry to you for the belated explanation. Clubjustin (talk) 04:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello Clubjustin4. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and content (CSD A3) moments after they are created. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 14:01, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Final Warning
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Don't vandalize my talk page! 172.6.238.220 (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Wait, are you troy? If so, leaving a warning on your page is hardly grounds for a final warning. Please,stay cool. Clubjustin (talk) 05:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Ok, you're not. But please, still, stay cool. Clubjustin (talk) 05:32, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Dumbass. That guy isn't me. 2.121.219.140 (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC) Troy

Notice
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2602:30A:C06E:EDC0:F473:80F:6A73:9F72 (talk) 05:41, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

On your signature
Hey there! This is just a friendly notice to let you know that I've redirected User:Clubjustin and User talk:Clubjustin to your respect user and user talk pages. Being the tps I am, I noticed your custom signature may cause the tiniest bit of confusion given the omission of the '4'. I hope you're okay with this change, as I'm sure you will be.

Also, you may want to consider a username change given that there is no user registered as 'Clubjustin'. If you're not a fan of the '4', there's nothing to lose. Hope this helps  Nott Nott &#124;talk 15:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thank you for reviewing my wikipage!

Penal007 (talk) 06:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>

Awww... Luckily User:Justinzilla is sleeping, or else he will come and eat it. Come on! I'll hide you! Clubjustin (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Check your fire!
Be sure to positively ID your target before you go in for the kill - Hold your fire till you see the whites in their eyes! Maybe checking rev history if both edit on diff page are from the same editor would help - Hopefully what just happened on Japan national under-20 football team would not happen again. But otherwise, good work on those vandals! <b color="midnightblue">JWNoctis</b>talk 05:34, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Opps! Sorry Sir! I thought I should be aiming at their hats! Clubjustin (talk) 08:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page that you nominated for speedy deletion, Dylan Rowell, is not eligible for speedy deletion. Speedy deletion is a shortcut that allows pages to be deleted without community discussion, and it can only be used in very specific circumstances. Please carefully read WP:NPP and WP:CSD before nominating any more pages for speedy deletion and ask any questions you have here. Thank you. - MrX 21:14, 7 March 2016 (UTC) ''Please see CSD:A1. '' - MrX 11:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I messed up, but the link you have given me is a red link. Clubjustin (talk) 11:29, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Warning: Don't vandalize other's talk pages
Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Not User:JamesBWatson, actually User:G Khan. Clubjustin (talk) 12:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Please
Please don't delete my page which was made by a lot of effort and love please ignore my page Bollywood Hunter (talk) 10:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * As disappointing as it may be, YOU are not notable. Clubjustin (talk) 10:14, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, the article has been deleted. DO NOT recreate it.Clubjustin (talk) 10:19, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Chomp!
Hi, how's things? Just a quick note letting you know I removed a CSD you placed on this user page. I did this for a number of reasons: I've dropped them a message trying to steer them towards sticking around and becoming a constructive member of Wikipedia. Immediately CSDing and not trying to let them know it's not okay can be seen as a little BITEy and often scares people off
 * The user is new and will likely see that page as "their profile"
 * They have not made any article space promotional edits (yet!)

Keep up your amazing work here, and I look forward to seeing you around on 'pedia! -- samtar talk or stalk 13:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh god. I've done User:Justinzilla's job...Clubjustin (talk) 13:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ROOOAR [[WP:Bite|CHOMP

CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP]] <b style="font-family:comic sans ms;font-size:125%;color:#Ffff0">Justinzilla</b> <i style="color:#S0E;font-size:175%;">  ROA R R! !</i> 13:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Eeeek! Keep that away from me! --  samtar talk or stalk 13:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Spews flames immolating new users everywhere<b style="font-family:comic sans ms;font-size:125%;color:#Ffff0">Justinzilla</b> <i style="color:#S0E;font-size:175%;">  ROA R R! !</i> 13:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I do love that video --  samtar talk or stalk 13:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you believe in magic? Clubjustin (talk) 14:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Disruptive Editing
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikipedia masterr (talk) 15:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Please stop removing the speedy tag. LET AN ADMIN MAKE THE FREAKING CALL ON YOUR LOL PLAYER PAGES. Thank you. Clubjustin (talk) 16:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Your recent editing history at These Thousand Hills (UK) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Stop restoring validly declined speedy deletion tags. You know perfectly well that A7 tags may be removed by non-admins (except the article creator). You initially tagged the article for speedy deletion one minute after a new editor began writing it, where the tect broke off mid-sentence and it was evident that the inexperienced article creator was trying to work further on their first article. Your action was abusive and violated WP:BITE. Restoring the tag is a violation of speedy deletion practice, and your insistence, here and elsewhere, that only admins may decline your proposals is not consistent with reasonable. good faith editing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 13:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Warn after 4 Reverts. There are 3. Please, what did I even do to offend you this much? Also, I'll start a PROD. Clubjustin (talk) 13:17, 15 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Clubjustin: NO. Don't warn after 4 reverts--4 reverts is a block. is quite correct: tagging this article a minute after it was created is too quick. That the editor has stopped editing--yeah, that's understandable, since you tagged if for deletion immediately. And "let an admin make the call" is incorrect as well; I am an admin, and I'm telling you that you should reread Criteria for speedy deletion. If another good-faith editor, in this case Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, removes the tag, you are not allowed to stick it back. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but isn't sending me this a bit too late? 4 days is plenty to read up on proper procedure, and yes, I have learnt. Thanks anyway. Clubjustin (talk) 09:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

This user
I'm laughing my head off right now dealing with this Johnnson111. Just have a look through his talk page history and everything going on here. It's annoying but hilarious. I've called on some admins to hard block, but to no avail so far. Amccann421 &#160; (talk) 05:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

"Hello, AmmcanN is gamergate harrasser member Justinclub please cease. Prof: Hello, I'm Amccann421. I am stalker.  I go box now. Johnnson111 (talk) 05:26, 21 May 2016 (UTC)" HAHA WTF Is going on with this guy? Clubjustin  Wanna Chat?  05:55, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Still not as good as Yuriko Tanabe. Clubjustin   Wanna Chat?  05:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hahaha that one's better for sure. Who knows how far this guy will go, though? Especially since he's now lumped you in as a fellow "harrasser". Amccann421 &#160; (talk)
 * Probably down the aforementioned rabbit hole. Clubjustin   Wanna Chat?  06:06, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * True. This guy is certainly not a "garden-variety vandal" like I prefer. Less of a headache. Amccann421 &#160; (talk)  06:09, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * He seems to be accusing us of being a part of the Gamergate controversy... alrighty then. Amccann421 &#160; (talk)  06:11, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Where did he even get that idea from? Clubjustin   Wanna Chat?  06:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Sock you encountered
See Edit Warring on AN3 Toddst1 (talk) 16:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * This is extremely funny. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  03:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Over-hasty and inaccurate speedy deletion tagging
It seems that you are unwilling to take the advice that you have been given more than once above. You added this tag a minute after the article was created, and, apart from that, it was invalid because the article said that the subject had appeared in several TV dramas, including one with a Wikipedia article. If you continue to treat new page patrol as a race rather than an activity that helps build this encyclopedia then your behaviour will be considered disruptive. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * even after a day, the article STILL fails WP:GNG. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  03:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * But that has nothing to do with speedy deletion. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 06:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The article at that time as simply stating she was a beautiful actress and had been in a few shows. If that doesn't warrant speedy deleting, nothing will. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  07:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Then you need to adjust your sights a bit before you do any more speedy deletion tagging. The "few shows" here included a notable TV drama, which easily passes the "indication of importance or significance" threshold of WP:A7. Of course the subject may not be notable, for which we have other, non-speedy, deletion processes. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Sources is written in Chinese
Everything on the data of Negrito Y-DNA is written Chinese which is something that could mistinterpreted. Until you find a English source please remove this Chinese which non-Chinese people don't understand. http://www.eastling.org/paper/YellowBrown-pbs.pdf 走向遠東的兩個現代人種    It is ridicolous  to use a chinese source for reference when you can't even understand it. - talk) 06:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The problem is I do. I live in Hong Kong, China, which has Wikipedia access. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  08:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Still you should give the source in English (international language ) when in comes to DNA studies because when we read something we want to confirm it with the reference that we can understand. Your source is only for Chinese. We have removed DNA data in Arabic, Turkish text and replaced it with English so it makes no sense that we should allow Chinese. How are we suppose to believe in something that we can't understand and there may even be a chance that there is a minsinterpretation so please replace it with a English source. - talk 06:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The problem is, there IS no English source. The article is from a state-run "magazine" that only publishes in Chinese, and due to wonky copyright laws, other publishers can't reuse it for printing unless they get permission. Good luck with that. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  08:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * 203.156.126.55, the applicable policy is WP:RSUE. If equally good sources are not available in English then non-English ones are perfectly acceptable. There is no requirement that every editor should be capable of reading every source, whether such inability is due to lack of library access, lack of the technical knowledge to understand a source, linguistic inability or any other reason. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * What a garbage reason. The fact that's is a non-English source doesn't make it legit and accurate.  Stick English sources with English text,  Chinese with Chinese. You say "  There is no requirement that every editor should be capable of reading every source "  which is the reason why many say wikipedia is full of crap.   Your editing somethings that's important which is genetics and you're using it in chinese.  - talk) 15:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Yet you use.... Google. As a source. And it has become clear you are in the UK, and thus, have absolutely no knowledge or ability to read Chinese. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  23:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you even bother to read the sources or do you have problem because is not in Chinese again ?  You removed my source without even giving a reason so now I'm asking you to give me a proper reason.
 * http://web.archive.org/web/20081029071336/http://hpgl.stanford.edu/publications/CB_2002_p1-18.pdf - 203.156.126.55 talk) 21:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Now who on earth are you? Clubjustin  Talkosphere  07:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Unknown (User:Muntele)
To use your own words, the next time you remove real information and vandalize wikipedia by placing fake amd nonexisting references, you may be permanently blocked form editing ANYTHING on wikipedia from your present account. I strongly advice you to REMOVE the false information you vandalised Wikipedia with, and to replace it with the real info which you deleted. All the evidence of it, as well the proof of what the real information is and which is the fake one, I presented in my edditing comment. I strongly advice you to learn how to read, and quit vandalising Wikipedia, orherwise we will be forced to take serious measures from a higher hand at Wikipedia team. Have a nice day.
 * Please don't make threats about blocking other users clearly acting in good faith. Vandalism is a concerted effort to undermine the integrity of the wiki, almost maliciously. Impersonating an admin from 'Wikipedia team' is fatuous given your editing history and will only land you in hot water. Remember to assume good faith.


 * From what I can tell, it's about whether Hippocrates should be called the first Greek physician or the first European physician. All of the sources cited have been lost to linkrot. Muntele, do you have a source you could link here backing up your claim? casually stealing Clubjustin's opportunity to respond here...  Nott Nott &#124;talk 21:38, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * God dang it, I was sleeping NottNott! Also, agreed. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  00:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Also you edit summary was TL,DRed by MediaWiki software. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  01:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Sorry!
Im sorry for the disruptive content. Theoreoheist24 (talk) 01:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * All the while, you vandalized again. *Facepalm* Clubjustin  Talkosphere  01:38, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

World Wide Web raised at WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Inventor(s) of the World Wide Web?. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Ok then. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  23:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

On CSDing...
Pretty funny to think I saw the WP:GNG fail before the attack page on Ege_Karatayli. I need to be trouted... - Nott Nott &#124;talk Reply with &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 13:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ But I ate all the trouts and minnows so we had to settle with a whale. Clubjustin Talkosphere  13:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Kaffir lime etymology
Got your message. I added more information back with citations to the lexicographers who have researched the name. While people love to jump at supposed slurs because it makes for attention getting blog posts, it's similar to the "niggardly" debacle. It's entirely possible, and in light of the lexicographical research on the topic, highly likely that the two "kaffirs" are actually just separate in origin and meaning. The section on the etymology of the kaffir lime should not exist solely of a speculative conclusion, to the glaring exclusion of experts who seem more intimately knowledgeable on that specific topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by an unspecified IP address

A cup of tea for you!

 * Thanks, had some tests so I had to leave for a while. Also, are you stalking me?  Clubjustin  Talkosphere  03:21, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hmm yeah! and who's justinzilla? - <b style="background-color:#08CEF9;color:black">IN</b><b style="background-color:black;color:#08CEF9">VISIBLE</b>knock! 03:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ROARRRR YOU FORGOT ABOUT ME? <b style="font-family:comic sans ms;font-size:125%;color:#Ffff0">Justinzilla</b> <i style="color:#S0E;font-size:175%;">  ROA R R! !</i> 03:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * OMG :D sounds like Godzilla! - <b style="background-color:#08CEF9;color:black">IN</b><b style="background-color:black;color:#08CEF9">VISIBLE</b>knock! 03:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

List of RWBY characters
Are you sure your revert is correct? --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 05:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Opps. Must have misclicked. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  05:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

SPI Supreme Genghis Khan
Please move report to Sockpuppet investigations/Supreme Genghis Khan. Don't capitalize the master acct's name, as the system is case sensitive. Thanks! TheCoffeeAddict  talk &#124; contribs  09:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Opps! Heh Heh. User:Invisible Guy must have laced the coffee... Clubjustin  Talkosphere  09:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Eh! You just made me Invisble :D - <b style="background-color:#08CEF9;color:black">IN</b><b style="background-color:black;color:#08CEF9">VISIBLE</b>knock! 09:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh god. I'll get the Invisible Guy Checkers. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  09:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * So many changes on link! well, nothing can catch INVISIBLE GUY not even your JUSTINZILLA! - <b style="background-color:#08CEF9;color:black">IN</b><b style="background-color:black;color:#08CEF9">VISIBLE</b>knock! 09:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Waah! These edits made me visible again! <b style="background-color:#08CEF9;color:black">IN</b><b style="background-color:black;color:#08CEF9">VISIBLE</b>knock! 10:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * When I spycheck (or pybro if you will) in tf2, I run the name Cluebot NG LOL. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  13:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Lachlan Hodge
Hi. May I ask, why did you move Lachlan Hodge.. to Lachlan Hodge (Athlete), rather than to Lachlan Hodge? Thanks, OnionRing (talk) 12:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I couldn't. It has been create protected. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  13:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Right, it was create protected as a repeatedly posted blatant hoax. Did you check the references on the new article to see if that might be a hoax too? OnionRing (talk) 13:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Opps. I think I'm going mad. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  15:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * LOL, no you're not, you were just trying to help out. But the Lachlan Hodge articles have been regularly posted by various sockpuppet accounts: check out the archive in WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Lachiehodge. Serial weenie, with a great deal of time on his hands. OnionRing (talk) 15:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * And to think I was the one to first report him ..... Clubjustin Talkosphere  15:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Wait, not the same guy. GOD BUCKING DAMNIT Clubjustin Talkosphere  15:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Easy there! NPP can get fiddly. Ain't no thaaaang. :-) OnionRing (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I just found out it is. Aaaaaaaaqaaawdasxd Clubjustin  Talkosphere  15:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I just ate 2 egg rolls. I'm going to bed, and forget this EVER HAPPENED. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  15:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!
I can't sleep. It's 23:53 where I live. The local burger king is closed. The McDonald's is closing at 12 pm. I'm not gonna make it. So I'm Watching Wales vs whatever on TV. I don't even like football. WHAT AM I DOING 15:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC) Clubjustin Talkosphere
 * What are you doing? Why, you're only watching the mighty unstoppable machine that is Wales steaming its way to the top, of course! Hope you enjoyed our national anthem. But watching it on TV doesn't convey the full force you get hearing it live - we're a nation of singers. Come on over! And afterwards, Burger King will still be open. OnionRing (talk) 16:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Sorry. I turned on the aircon and its all fine. Alllll Finnnne. Clubjustin Talkosphere  16:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Josh Herbert
Dear Clubjustin, I saw you flagged the Josh Herbert article and that you asked me for a reference. Sorry for not replying earlier, but I think I put around 15 references at the bottom of his page. I'm trying now to remove this wikipedia blockage on this article and was wondering if you have any advice? I've proceeded to follow the standard instructions, but I haven't had a reply from wikipedia yet. If you know anything that could help, I would really appreciate it :) I wrote this article out of simple love for the music. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan Tessier (talk • contribs) 19:44, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The artice was blocked due to copyvio. Remove the parts you copied and resubmit. Clubjustin Talkosphere  03:14, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Hey Clubjustin, I re-submitted a new one but it's still stuck in "temporary" mode. When do you reckon it will be online normally without the "temp"? here's the temp article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Josh_Herbert/Temp

thanks so much for your help :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan Tessier (talk • contribs) 07:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * No probs. And thank you for investing you time on Wikipedia! BTW,you should email Josh and get him to help clear things up.  Clubjustin  [[User Talk:Clubjustin| Talkosphere</span

> ]] 08:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, the temp article will stick around. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  08:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Clubjustin, thanks for your swift reply. If I email him, what should I ask him to do? does he need to contact you or wikipedia to get the article cleared? if yes, could you provide me with the exact info you think wiki might need from the Josh Herbert, if possible, an email address I should contact (yours or wiki) as well. Do you think if I clear this up the old article will be back up or should I still write a new one? Sorry to be so inquisitive, clearing up this copyrightvio stuff is brand new to me. Your help is very much appreciated. Take Care Clubjustin :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan Tessier (talk • contribs) 08:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Tell him to press the "contact Wikipedia" button on the bottom. The instructions will be there. Also send him a link to his article in the same email to show him he has to clear the problem up. Cheers, Clubjustin Talkosphere  08:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Ok thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan Tessier (talk • contribs) 08:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * No probes Clubjustin  Talkosphere  08:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC) --Jonathan Tessier (talk) 08:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

PS: got the memo on the tildes. Great stuff ;) Jonathan Tessier (talk) 08:49, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I saw your post on the help desk. To that I also don't know how long it might take. Probably till Josh responds. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  08:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks so much Clubjustin. I'm asking them what would be the easiest way for Josh Herbert to respond. If it's just a small message to an email adress saying "I authorize the use of the contributor's text etc.." then it's cool. But if he has to sign up to wikipedia and learn everything like a contributor has to, then I don't even think he will bother. --Jonathan Tessier (talk) 08:56, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It should be just a email. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  08:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Great thx--Jonathan Tessier (talk) 09:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

"Disruptive" Edits
Hey man, how's it going? Can you explain to me what was "disruptive" about my edits to Wilt Chamberlain? Aside from his basketball career, one of the main things Chamberlain is known for is his sexual activity. I included a quote from Wilt himself where he says that sex is just as important to his life as is basketball. What is disruptive about this? Thanks for any clarification. Reverse polish (talk) 03:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Answered here. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  13:00, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 17
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 17, April-May 2016 by The Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria

<div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Read the full newsletter The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * New donations this month - a German-language legal resource
 * Wikipedia referals to academic citations - news from CrossRef and WikiCite2016
 * New library stats, WikiCon news, a bot to reveal Open Access versions of citations, and more!

Reverted your Reversion on Tigrayans, You gave no reason
I reverted your reversion on Tigrayans article. I gave reason why I made the changes I made, go see the Tigrayan Talkpage.Puhleec (talk) 07:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Rollback doesn't allow edit summaries, and as a recent pages patroler, I have no idea you posted on the talk page. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  07:08, 23 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello Clubjustin, I have been having a dispute with Sennaitgebremariam and now EthiopianHabesha. I have only added and only removed some things which were irrelevant to the scope of the articles sections.Puhleec (talk) 07:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello Clubjustin, you are more than welcome to come to the Tigrayan Talkpage and see the discussions that have been had and participate.Puhleec (talk) 07:13, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

These are the Talk sections within the Tigrayan talkpage:

1.WIKIPEDIA ADMINS/EDITORS: Prove that Ancient Aksumite(Axum) Kings were TIGRAYANS?

2.REQUEST to DELETE Aksumite(Axumite) Kings listed under Notable Tigrayans because it is Original Research. No Citation providedPuhleec (talk) 07:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

what happen
Who r u... TheHEAT LEADZ (talk) 05:21, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I am User:Clubjustin. Hopefully that answers your question. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  05:25, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Reverting edits on Nevermores talkpage
User Nevermore repeatedly deleted messages to him on his talkpage. I then reverted his edits. On Danish wiki you aren't allowed to delete messages on your talkpage as it ruins communication and other can't see the "backstory" of a particular user (what issues his/her editing has raised), I have always assumed similar rules applied on English wiki. Please clarify this. Nevermore has made some rather destructive edits. How am I supposed to address this if he can just delete my messages?--Batmacumba (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, you deleted more info than Nevermore had, which isn't sensible.--Batmacumba (talk) 00:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Nevermore moved the page of the Icelandic party Vidreisn to Restoration, which isn't the official English name of the party, without prior discussion. Since you have interfered in this, how do I deal with it if he refuses to communicate with me, both on the articles talkpage and his own? He seems like a beliggerent type (lots of unilateral edits).--Batmacumba (talk) 00:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * On the English wiki, we can delete your messages.Also, I thought he was archiving and you reverted it. My apologies.I'll look into the issue and see what I can do. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  04:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't know a lot about polish politics, so could you find a source defining WHAT the official English name is? After reading your (deleted) posts on his talk page, I see he has tried to resolve the situation. However, due to the fact the name is not English, so a common translation is acceptable until a source is found. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  04:11, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Reverting Edits to "Millennial" article
Clubjustin,

Good evening. Just recently received a message from you that one of my additions to the "Millennials" page was reverted due to expected vandalism and not providing any references or citations to back up my inserted claims.

However, just as you prefer, my addition was backed up by an actual source and reference citation that I had previously provided. I would be more than happy to verify this reference again.

Just as yourself, I also would like to maintain Wikipedia's positive reputation of providing non-biased research and information for others to learn and educate themselves on. Any contribution I have previously made, or will make in the future, will always adhere to Wikipedia's expectations by providing solid evidence and actual quotations to back my claims and contributions.

In addition to that, I noticed that a subsequent contributor had deleted part of my contribution, borrowed my reference citation, and used the remaining non-deleted comment for another unrelated sentence and source.

Would be happy to clear up any of the perceived smoke and reinstate my previous contributions to the "Millennials" page as I remain committed to ensuring Wikipedia's positive reputation and to provide non-biased or opinionated information that may prohibit another person's learning. The reference citation has already been provided.

I appreciate your time and consideration as I look forward to your response. Thank you.

Regards,

--SolomonSalem (talk) 05:07, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

FYI
I saw you added a speedy deletion notice to Costas Panagopolous. The article's creator removed the notice, so I restored it. Safehaven86 (talk) 18:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

One of my pages deleted for'being about someone' was actually a geometry article
It was about a 12 dimensional shape Drewvader1009 (talk) 00:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Blocked edit for longest airing tv drama
General hospital has been on the air for several decades longer than the one listed and should be listed as longest airing tv medical drama. In fact it is the 3rd longest airing drama ever and the longest one still on the air too. Drewvader1009 (talk) 19:11, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Jackass
My jackass, Clubjustin!

Dumbass
My dumbass, Clubjustin!
 * Honestly pretty funny. I'll keep this. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  07:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Userspace edits
Hi, this edit, although made in poor judgement, is valid. Please refrain from editing other's userspace - I note the user has previously added userboxes which are irrelevant to their account, and I agree with your removal of them -- samtar talk or stalk 13:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It was before he started that bogus RFA, so it was invalid at the time. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  13:19, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, fair enough :) thank you for helping out with this editor -- samtar talk or stalk 13:44, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Helen of Troy
My bad, I thought it was common knowledge that Helen of Troy did not have a horse called Alice. Can you disprove this statement? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.35.216.235 (talk) 13:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Lone Fleming
I made edits to Lone Fleming because some of the titles were incorrect. La endemoniada is best known as Demon Witch Child. "The Exorcist and the Child Witch" is a translation of the German title, nobody has ever used that as the title for the movie. A Candle for the Devil is the best known title as well.

2601:547:901:F646:D8B:E375:D8D3:39A1 (talk) 03:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigations/Bdebbarma
[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bdebbarma Your comment there] seems to have cut'n'pasted parts of another comment, and also changed one of the usernames I had listed. Could you double-check if you intended to add another account, and what if any other comments you were trying to add? DMacks (talk) 19:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the (overly) long response, but it was adding a comment and then my phone freaked out. The copy function became paste, and I don't know why. I blame swiftkey. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  10:16, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries! DMacks (talk) 11:53, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome!
It was very warm.

Pigrocket (talk) 16:41, 20 August 2016 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>
 * Awwwwww! Thats so cute! Clubjustin  Talkosphere  16:41, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Jiwachhpur
Hello Clubjustin, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jiwachhpur, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. -- GB fan 12:02, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 18
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 18, June–July 2016 by, Ocaasi, Samwalton9, UY Scuti, and Sadads

<div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Read the full newsletter The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * New donations - Edinburgh University Press, American Psychological Association, Nomos (a German-language database), and more!
 * Spotlight: GLAM and Wikidata
 * TWL attends and presents at International Federation of Library Associations conference, meets with Association of Research Libraries
 * OCLC wins grant to train librarians on Wikimedia contribution

BiS: constructive edit
Hi, I think you're mistaken in reverting the edit I made to the BiS page. The name "Go Jeela" that someone else put there doesn't appear anywhere else online, and while I understand their reason in making that change, I don't think it's correct. (It also doesn't match the spelling used in the infobox and timeline, so it stands out uncomfortably.)

Actually, Zeela's Twitter handle is @GOZEELA_BiS, so the spelling is based on that. Thanks for reading. 82.11.52.172 (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry
Dear clubjustin,

I'm sorry for my disruptive edits. I just thought it would be funny to add the lyrics to take on me by a-ha to the Oxford webpage. I guess it wasn't. Please forgive me, thanks

From, Trashboy88 Trashboy88 (talk) 13:35, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Warning
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Hortonhearsawho. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hortonhearsawho (talk • contribs) 13:10, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hortonhearsawho (talk • contribs) 13:14, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

As stated on ANI, users are permitted to remove content from their talk page, with the exception of declined unblock requests while the block is in effect. Articles, however, are different of course. 331dot (talk) 13:26, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

It is you who are mistaken
Take it back, I have watched all the JAG episodes and Harmon Rabb ended up as a Captain officially. So you take in back.116.12.147.235 (talk) 06:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Source? Clubjustin  Talkosphere  09:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge and WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 19
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 19, September–October 2016 by Nikkimaria, Sadads and UY Scuti <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Read the full newsletter 19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * New and expanded donations - Foreign Affairs, Open Edition, and many more
 * New Library Card Platform and Conference news
 * Spotlight: Fixing one million broken links

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter
Hello ,


 * Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action. If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
 * Second set of eyes

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation. Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .
 * Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Unicable (Mexican network), Clubjustin.

Unfortunately TonyBallioni has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"I removed your A1 tag because this article's subject is easily identifiable and can be determined both by the sentence and the reference to the company page. Because of this it does not fit the A1 criteria for speedy deletion."

To reply, leave a comment on TonyBallioni's talk page.

Why are you reporting me for vandalism
I don't understand, aren't talk pages meant for well "talking", why do you keep warning me? UnjustNation (talk) 14:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Because you keep attacking editors. Clubjustin  Talkosphere  14:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Happy birthday!
Warm regards, Mz7 (talk) 00:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter #2
Hello ,


 * Please help reduce the New Page backlog 

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.


 * Getting the tools we need

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
 * Improve the tools: Vote here.
 * Reduce your review load: Vote here

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Richard Uzeloto, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 01:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Great. How do I get Twinkle to stop reviewing speedy deletion noms again? Clubjustin  Talkosphere  01:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * There is an option in Twinkle Preferences under CSD, but I don't think you can choose when to mark as patrolled (unlike normal tagging, where there is an option at the top of the dialogue box). It's always or never as far as I can tell. Adam9007 (talk) 01:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 20
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 20, November-December 2016 by, , ,

<div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Read the full newsletter MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Partner resource expansions
 * New search tool for finding TWL resources
 * # 1lib1ref 2017
 * Wikidata Visiting Scholar

Improper Reverting
Clubjustin,

Barack Obama is President of the United States until 12:00pm on January 20, 2017. Donald Trump is not the incumbent President. Please acknowledge this. Steelers628 (talk) 05:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

RD reversion
The change of "took" to "tool" in WP:RD/H was to correct my own typo. I'll redo it. No need to reply, I'm not distressed or anything. --76.71.6.254 (talk) 05:58, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

I See You Do This A Lot.
And by that I mean reverting my edit on the page for Henare, the NJPW Wrestler. He used to wrestle in New Zealand as A-Class before using his own name. Don't revert things when you don't know what you're doing. 118.92.215.41 (talk) 05:46, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Suzanne Waldon's Page.

Hi.

You have indicated to me that there are a number of changes made that are unconstructive. I know this person in my professional circle. What was unconstructive to revert nearly every change? Please let me know and in future could you please provide context in your messages as to why changes have been made?

Thank you.

Tom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomjreige (talk • contribs) 06:03, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2
Hello , We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October. The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to. Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten. This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody,  and
 * A HUGE backlog
 * Second set of eyes
 * Abuse
 * 1) this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting  in  a community ban.
 * 2) this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in  a community ban.
 * 3) This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Hello , Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed. We now have New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced. If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Still a MASSIVE backlog

thank you
Thank you so much for teaching me. I am getting a hang of this platform. thanks a lot again Agraable1 (talk) 09:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguating Links is constructive, not vandalism
My edits to the video game pages are part of WikiProject_Disambiguation. Neither was vandalism and the other was changed to link to dictionary entry rather than a disambiguation page. I would appreciate if you would redo my edits and exercise more caution before accusing someone of vandalism. Wikijenitor (talk) 09:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

My edit to the Dungeon game was a formatting error and corrected. Would you please clarify the correct Robert Weaver this page should link to, otherwise this should be unlinked. Thank you. Wikijenitor (talk) 09:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Wikijeniotr is right about the dab link. Links generally should not go to disambiguation pages, and there is no obvious target listed at the dab page. That being the case I have restored the edit. Please assume good faith and don't be so quick to accuse others. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Korean
The article itself states that the majority of linguists consider Korean to be a language isolate. 42.61.51.66 (talk) 09:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

List of airline codes (S)
Hello, ICAO designator 'SAN' belongs to [http://silvair.net Silvair Sp. z.o.o.] (no English Wiki page). Please restore my addition.

Servicios Aéreos Nacionales, which previously had ICAO designator 'SAN', is now defunct.

Please view a recent copy of ICAO Doc 8585/176 - Designators for Aircraft Operating Agencies, Aeronautical Authorities. FW (talk) 10:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Rollback
After looking at your recent edits, it is clear you are zipping around reverting things with Huggle without taking the time to be sure they are unconstructive, and warning users for vandalism when they are editing in good faith. This is not acceptable, and I have therefore revoked your rollback permission so that you can no longer use Huggle. Huggle is a very powerful, but very fast tool that is intended for fighting vandalism, but you seemed to be using it to WP:BITE a lot of new users in addition to its intended purpose. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Huh. Not going to pull a excuse out of my ass here, seeing some of the edits, which I don't even member touching. Welp. Any chance of reapplying? Clubjustin  Talkosphere  23:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You can re-apply at WP:PERM at any time, but I would suggest re-establishing a pattern of good judgement when determining what is and is not vandalism first if you want it to be granted. I see you are already using Twinkle, that's a good way to get back on the right track as it is a great patrolling tool but relies solely on the operator to spot vandalism. It looks like you were letting Huggle's automation in flagging possibly problematic edits supersede your own judgement, so doing it this way should be a good refresher. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

about an article named 'kantang hot spring forest park'
I saw your review that saying about Biography of a person, but my article is talking about a forest park which is a place not a person. So I want to know what is your comment actually means? Wathineemay (talk) 07:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

You have breached 3RR
In the course of investigating an AN3 report, I noticed that you violated the three revert rule. Normally, I would block you for 24 hours, but seeing as I warned the other user (due to the incompleteness of said report). I'll do the same for you. You are hereby warned that any further edit warring (even one not contravening 3RR). may be met with sanctions. Thanks. El_C 11:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)