User talk:Padma Award Editor and Creator

I have added many Padma Award Winners Name so please can you write articles on him 2401:4900:51D0:6877:55EB:F71D:3966:469A (talk) 04:51, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay I will try

Hi Can you publish this article Draft:Brij Kishore Sharma "Tara" this article is of a Padma Shri winner. 2401:4900:51DD:73F9:A425:9904:AFF5:A56C (talk) 08:23, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Shanti Jain moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Shanti Jain, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Nitesh003 (TALK)  09:09, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Nitesh003 You know that what is Padma Shri and the page was cited by biggest newspapers from India

Unblock
@User:Yamla How can you say that I am sockpuppet do you have any proof. Padma Award Editor and Creator (talk) 11:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Unblock Review
@Daniel Case Use Check User to prove me that I am the blocked user.

I am not that blocked user
Even if you aren't the same person, you have taken over the task of promoting the same person as they did, using numerous accounts, which is no better than the same person carrying on. I have actually seen enough evidence to persuade me that you are more likely than not the same person, though. Also, you have clearly addressed messages to yourself, to pretend to be several different people, and that is enough reason for a block, irrespective of whether you are the same person as the other accounts mentioned. As for asking for a CheckUser to exonerate you, they won't attempt to do that, for the simple reason that it is possible to take steps to avoid detection by CheckUser. JBW (talk) 21:43, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. --Blablubbs (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)