User talk:PadreRenzo

Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited José Burgos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filipino ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jos%C3%A9_Burgos check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jos%C3%A9_Burgos?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Military chaplain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arlington Heights ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Military_chaplain check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Military_chaplain?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Regarding some edits concerning Protestantism
Edits like this and this could seem innocuous, but in light of edits like this could give the impression that you don't think that Protestants should be called Christians, and that only the Catholic Church are Christians.

Now, granted, this one (in light of other edits) suggests that perhaps you'd like to pretend Protestants don't exist (although I'd rather hope that perhaps, on some level, you realize that we're not baptized in the name of Paul, Luther, or López de Legazpi).

Wikipedia doesn't deal in any kind of sectarianism, regardless of sect. Ian.thomson (talk) 08:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

A summary of some important site policies and guidelines

 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is cite, summarize, and paraphrase professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without addition, nor commentary.
 * "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
 * Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
 * Primary sources are usually avoided to prevent original research. Secondary or tertiary sources are preferred for this reason as well.
 * A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * User-generated sources (such as blogs, social media profiles, self-published books, or pay-to-print books) are generally not reliable sources. The only exception is when an already notable subject makes a claim about themselves that is not countered or doubted by independent sources.
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.  In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence.  In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.

Ian.thomson (talk) 08:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Thomas Becket does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Ditto for many other edits. Eric talk 14:12, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gérald Lacroix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Primate of Canada ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/G%C3%A9rald_Lacroix check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/G%C3%A9rald_Lacroix?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul the Apostle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evangelists ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Paul_the_Apostle check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Paul_the_Apostle?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Chasuble. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:13, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saint James Matamoros, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johann Eck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scholastic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)