User talk:Padrien

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!  Triplestop  x3  16:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of General Purpose Pictures
A tag has been placed on General Purpose Pictures, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Triplestop  x3  16:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of General Purpose Pictures
A tag has been placed on General Purpose Pictures requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  18:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of General Purpose Pictures
A tag has been placed on General Purpose Pictures, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  18:46, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Language like "has made substantial inroads in this genre, and continue to push the envelope... is presently in development on... ground breaking commercial campaigns" is advertising, not information, and has no place in a reference work. What is your connection to this company? -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Note to reviewing admin: the need to pee came between me posting the message below and the blocked user posting the message above. Nevertheless, the point still holds (indeed, it is reinforced somewhat). ➲ REDVERS It sucks to be me 21:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
Despite the above warnings, you continued to recreate what appears to be an advertisement you were adding to Wikipedia. That plus the fact that you have declined to answer Orangemike's question suggests heavily that you are here to promote your organisation rather than contribute to our advertising-free not-for-profit encyclopedia funded by donations. If you're willing to contribute on other subjects unrelated to your organisation and to do so in a constructive manner accepting input on this page from your fellow editors, then we'll unblock you. Put on this page, together with a short list of subjects, other than your organisation, that you're interested in editing. Otherwise, this is the parting of the ways for us. ➲ REDVERS It sucks to be me 21:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

You'll need to read the following, and understand (and display understanding of) our conflicts of interests rules. If you create or edit articles about your company, the articles are likely to be deleted and your contributions reverted. You would be immediately reblocked for making such edits. Your company could (this is not a threat; it's just what has happened to other companies) also get negative publicity for attempting to promote itself using a not-for-profit encyclopedia funded by donations. Some elements of the media have been known to take this to mean companies using Wikipedia for promotion are stealing from a charity and the poor publicity for such an act is, I'd imagine, hard to counteract.

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. ➲ REDVERS It sucks to be me 21:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)