User talk:Paduch

Welcome
Hello  and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.  ''Click here to reply to this message.''  ukexpat (talk) 15:50, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Competency-circle.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Competency-circle.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 15:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Please note that non-free files cannot be used on draft articles while in userspace. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 15:51, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Sorry, but I've taken out your link at Competency-based recruitment again as it appears to be a commercial site which adds nothing to the info in the article. Single links like this give the impression of spam, so if you want it in, there should be others to accompany it. (Some editors might object to those too, but so long as there are a few unrelated companies mentioned I think the spam objection would fail.) Peridon (talk) 15:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. Peridon (talk) 18:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Competency-circle.png
Thanks for uploading File:Competency-circle.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 04:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Lists of vendors
My apologies if my post above was mis-worded. (It was, not if it was...) What I should have said was that if there was a list of commercial sites, it wouldn't do much harm to add another. I unfortunately worded it to imply that the creation of a list was the thing to do. These lists are not approved of by many editors on the grounds that Wikipedia is not a directory, and if someone takes the section out under WP:DIRECTORY, they are probably right. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia where people can look up information, rather than a place where they can find where to buy something. Once again, my apologies for possibly causing confusion in an off-moment. Peridon (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Competency-based development


The article Competency-based development has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is entirely unsourced, and was created and contributed to by a user who plagiarized content to create similar articles. It may be partially or wholly plagiarized. Its scope also overlaps with similar articles such as Competency-based learning, but it is not suitable for a merge due to its complete lack of sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. warmly, ezlev.  talk  20:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Competency-based performance management


The article Competency-based performance management has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is entirely unsourced, and was created and contributed to by a user who plagiarized content to create similar articles. It may be partially or wholly plagiarized. Its scope also overlaps with similar articles such as Competency-based learning, but it is not suitable for a merge due to its complete lack of sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. warmly, ezlev.  talk  20:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Competency-based management


The article Competency-based management has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is almost entirely unsourced, and was created and contributed to by a user who plagiarized content to create similar articles. It may be partially or wholly plagiarized. Its scope also overlaps with similar articles such as Competency-based learning, but it is not suitable for a merge due to its lack of sources. It also has major tagged issues which have not been resolved in over a decade."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. warmly, ezlev.  talk  20:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Competency-circle.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Competency-circle.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 10:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Competency-profile.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Competency-profile.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 10:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Hr-planning-model.png
Thanks for uploading File:Hr-planning-model.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 10:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC)