User talk:Pagalpanda/sandbox

I've reviewed your work! Cool stuff! Not sure where my peer review shows up, but I hope you can find it easily haha. --Marquette Mutchler (talk) 21:14, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Update: Found out I need to post the review from the word doc here! The article you are reviewing: Andean Coot

1.	First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? -	I like that they included where they would place their information and what it would be labeled. I also like that the information is concise and easy to read

2.	What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? -	I think minor changes to sentence structure and flow could help the section. It would allow the information to be read even easier and not be as choppy.

3.	What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? -	Sentence structure

4.	Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? If so, what? -	This article is on high altitude adaptations just the same as mine! Although the specific adaptations aren’t the same, it allows me to compare and think about other structure formats.

5.	Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? Specifically, does the information they are adding to the article make sense where they are putting it? -	Yes. The information goes from broad to specific and the placement in the large article makes sense.

6.	Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? -	Everything seems to make sense. The lesser-known topics have less information and vice versa.

7.	Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? -	No

8.	Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y." -	No, everything seems neutral.

9.	Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? -	Yes. Would be nice to see other sources though. 10.	Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view. -	Yes, only one source listed. Would be good to have another at least.

11.	Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately! -	Yes the entire section is referenced.

--Marquette Mutchler (talk) 01:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)