User talk:Paganinip

Welcome!

Hello, Paganinip, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Social network poisoning, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Social network poisoning


The article Social network poisoning has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced essay or original  research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Welcome, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It currently has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Social network poisoning
This article is still completely  unreferenced. If you  can, please return to  the page and  add inline references with  footnotes that  can be verified,  as soon  as possible to  avoid it  being deleted as a personal essay  or original  research. If you need any  help, don't  hesitate to  ask  me on my  talk page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:18, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Dougweller (talk) 05:09, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Some editors have raised concerns about Social network poisoning, an article you  created. A discussion is taking  place at Talk:Social network poisoning, where you  are most  welcome to make any  suggestions as to  how the issues can be addressed in order to  avoid possible deletion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

securityaffairs.co
If you only want to add links to a blog, instead of improving articles, I suggest that you stop, or rethink your approach. bobrayner (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

My blog is one of the most authoritative scientific sources on the subject, read it, study it and then return to discuss with me.


 * Regardless of how reliable it is, Wikipedia is not a venue for self-promotion and has a specific conflict of interest policy. Here's what I'd suggest (two things):
 * Add a section to the talk page of the respective articles saying something to the effect of "I wrote an article I think could be helpful to include here but I don't want to add it myself for COI reasons. Leaving it here: [link]"
 * (Though this one gets a little more dicey depending on how it's done) - Use the blog as a source to improve the articles, not just to tack onto the bottom. If you see a citation needed tag in one of the articles that the blog properly addresses, it might be helpful to include it, for example. Just know that especially since Wiki-PR last year, Wikipedians are hypersensitive to self-promotion, so disclosure of COI at every step is pretty important, as is being here to build an encyclopedia. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 15:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 16:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making promotional edits. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. PhilKnight (talk) 22:57, 9 November 2014 (UTC)