User talk:Pagodelosrugbyball

October 2010
Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, such as you did in the article Pacific Dawn. Wikipedia is not the "Yellow Pages". If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets, such as Wikia's Yellowikis. Thank you. → ROUX  ₪  10:05, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop undoing my information, I do not work for Bacardi or 42 Below. I did in fact work for them for 6 years (I finished 2 years ago) and know a lot about their history - which if you actually read, you will see that is in NO way a marketing strategy, in fact the first time it was undone I presumed it was a Bacardi watch dog trying to clean up the facts about the brand. By you saying that what I have contributed is marketing and advertising is a complete joke - as what you have restored is in fact the marketing we used to use and is actually printed on the bottle. I think you had better stick to your Desperate Housewives or something you know without ruining the great thing that wikipedia is, I have no gain by putting what I have up, it's the truth and I feel it needs to be up. Thanks.


 * What you feel is immaterial. Please understand that information on Wikipedia must be verifiably and reliably sourced and must not appear to be marketing. Familiarize yourself with the bold, revert, discuss cycle; if you truly feel the information you are adding is relevant and appropriate, discuss it on the talk page of the article. Please also learn about the policies of no personal attacks and remaining civil. If you continue to insert unreferenced marketing-speak into this article you are likely to be blocked. Thank you. → ROUX   ₪  10:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

So you think that what is already up is true? Has this been reverted, discussed? I'm perplexed. All the information is available and I don't see what or where the marketing speak is compared to the glossy version that is currently up, which is totally incorrect. I have attacked no one or said anything malicious or inflammatory so I still don't understand why you have taken it upon yourself to restore text in which you know nothing about? I see you have been blocked or banned from other subjects before so I'm wondering if you just get kicks from undoing honest contributions that people make?
 * It is customary to have opinions preceded by knowledge; I would advise you to not comment on subjects you know nothing about, namely 'banned from other subject,' which is in fact something that has never happened. Please discuss changes you wish to make to the article on the talkpage. I trust that is clear. → ROUX   ₪  11:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)