User talk:Pagoprima


 * }

Speedy deletion nomination of Breil (company)


A tag has been placed on Breil (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle  Faddle  15:24, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Instead, I've simply changed it to a redirect to Binda Group, joining Breil Milano and Breil Tribe. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=573026020 your edit] to Breil may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * * [Breil (company)], watches, jewelry and fragrance brands of the Binda Group

Wikilinking
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
 * dates
 * years
 * commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
 * common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

This even applies for infoboxes.

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony  (talk)  10:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

infatti
sono talmente ovvie le ragioni che tu esponi da risultare persino banali quindi comprensibili pure a chi non conosce certi argomenti: infatti sono intenzionato a non occuparmi di tali discussioni per impiegare il mio tempo allo sviluppo degli articoli. Ricambio i complimenti a te per il tuo apporto al progetto e apprezzo la tua disponibilità verso di me. Ciao e alla prossima--Puccetto (talk) 16:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Breil (company) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Breil (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Breil (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 12:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

rieccolo
il solito personaggio s'è fatto vivo pure con te: possiamo organizzare una petizione per metterlo in condizione di non far danno? Ma che problemi ha? Mi sta facendo perdere tanto tempo inutilmente.--Puccetto (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

No offense intended
Dear Pagoprima, just to avoid misunderstandings: I don't attack articles for fun or because of frustration. Neither I, neither anyone else finds it fun to have an article named as "Article for deletion", but sometimes there are reasons for it. Articles should be based on "hard" knowledge and written in an encyclopaedic style, that is simply the concept of Wikipedia. When writing an article about fashion, whenever the product is praised it is best to give a reference, or else to omit this part I think. In doing so, it becomes less likely that an article is named for deletion (or deleted). Anyway, good luck in the further writing and editing of articles! Regards, Kareldorado (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * P.S.: In the meanwhile I put a striketrough over my AfD comment on the Breil article as you corrected for it.

Fonte delle informazioni sull'utile Breil
La fonte delle informazioni sull'utile Breil è questa, dice 180 milioni fatturato totale del gruppo Binda di cui I 2 terzi(ossia 120 milioni) sono generati dal marchio Breil. Mi sembra attendibile e verosimile, non sono però riuscio a trovare ulteriori conferme. Silvio_Marano (talk) 20:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)