User talk:Pagw

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: In addition, you are encouraged (but not required) to cite your sources. Citation templates has some useful fill-in-the-blank type things that may make that easier, but feel free not to use them if you find them confusing.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Use the Sandbox to experiment with Wiki-markup

You may want to look at some of Wikipedia's best work to get an idea of what we are aiming at.

You are invited to use your userpage to tell us a little about yourself; yours is here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on this page (which is your talk page) and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. You also might be interested in being adopted by Wikipedia's Adopt-a-user program. Again, welcome!

~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 15:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

"removed" post
Your post wasn't removed; it was moved to the bottom of the page. New topics go at the bottom of talk pages; not the top. I know this seems backward and unintuitive; but that's where they go. I didn't delete it, remove it, or take it away. I moved it to the bottom of the page and responded there. That's where it is. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 16:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Rowan Wiliams
Are you seriously asking for quotations from the Sun, the Daily Mail etc. at the time of his appointment? The se are not comments which require references as to learned journals. You are welcome to look at back copies of the said newspapers in the weeks and months after his appointment. Maybe you think that the article should not have comments in it. Perhaps that is right, but frankly, I am not prepared to find a library that has copies of the Sun of four or five years ago. Roger Arguile 13:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Hilbert space
I noticed you added a tag to Hilbert space with the edit summary "no footnotes". I hope you spotted that the article actually uses Harvard references, not footnotes, so although it could be improved, it is not as poorly sourced as it first appears. Geometry guy 10:48, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Van Noorden index
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Van Noorden index, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 14:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Vector quadruple product for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Vector quadruple product, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vector quadruple product until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 14:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)