User talk:Paigeb48616

Your edits to Kermit the Frog
Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Kermit the Frog, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 21:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to Sanjay and Craig
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sanjay and Craig with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 21:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Austin & Ally with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scary Larry


A tag has been placed on Scary Larry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jinkinson  talk to me  23:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Regarding Speedy Deletion


 * Hello, Paigeb48616. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
 * I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion. 
 * Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into things to avoid or what Wikipedia is not.


 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written about the subject. 
 * Sometimes articles are deleted because they contain content copyrighted elsewhere . Such content can be used as a source of information, but the content here must be completely rewritten from scratch.
 * Some articles contain material written in a promotional tone. These must often be written from scratch. They are vigorously deleted.
 * Any content that is negative in tone and unsourced or which is disparaging will also be vigorously deleted.
 * Any deficiencies with notability, sourcing, or things to avoid should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.
 * For test edits, click Paigeb48616/sandbox
 * If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.
 * You may find this tool useful: Google custom search

CONTENT IN ARTICLES NEEDS TO BE RELIABLY SOURCED. Dloh cierekim  23:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm Newyorkadam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Cameron Boyce, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Newyorkadam (talk) 01:24, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Peyton List (actress born 1998). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Peyton List (actress born 1998) was changed by Paigeb48616 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960437 on 2014-01-17T01:26:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 22:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)