User talk:Paigeger/sandbox

Reputation Peer Review: Good, but add more information/sources to add to your entry. By doing this you will add credibility to your wikipedia entry.

This article is strong and presents good information with a reliable source. I think that to make the article stronger, maybe you could add one more source to present more information to strengthen your claim. Also, I would cite the sentence that begins with "In this experiment..." just so it doesn't seem like you're being opinionated. Good job!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktbannis (talk • contribs) 12:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review -Hazelrod2-

This article is strong and provides non-biased factual evidence. It seems to be very reliable and easy to understand. I would suggest adding a source that is more up to date to make this topic more reliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazelrod2 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
You did a good job at including factual, non-biased information to the article. Consider going into more detail. Also, I would recommend getting more sources, as the second half of the paragraph should be cited as well. Benati junior (talk) 20:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

PEER REVIEW The piece you wrote is very easy to understand and seems like something that someone could easily read. You could go into more detail and provide a few more than just one source, but your information is good and factual, non opinionatedDtross165 (talk) 16:29, 7

Peer Review Seems as if you're missing a citation, also your sources seem outdated, I would use a current date source

November 2018 (UTC)