User talk:Paigejaru/Cinta Larga

The lead paragraph added some useful insight on the language. The regional and statistical insight relating to the speakers are where it’s from are very good. The lead includes facts such as diseases being a cause for the language to die out, but doesn’t mention them in the article. Maybe explore that more later on. The lead also should include more information on the history and diamond mine controversy, because it didn’t mention them, and those two aspects seem to be a major part of the actual article.

Final Review
Hi Paige, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: On the whole, the article employs proper English spelling and grammar. 5 points.
 * 2) Structure: The article does not follow the suggested template but some attempt at organization is made. 4 points.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: Most of the claims are backed by references to the literature. 5 points.
 * 5) Relevance: Not all of the information is relevant to the subject of the language. 3 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 975/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 3 points.

The final score is 25/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 22:20, 12 May 2021 (UTC)