User talk:Pain16

April 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Saint Lucians have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Saint Lucians was changed by Pain16 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876981 on 2022-04-23T05:12:01+00:00

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tol (talk &#124; contribs) @ 05:13, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of Saint Lucians, you may be blocked from editing. • Gene93k (talk) 21:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you added Harold Dolor to List of Saint Lucians for the 4th time. Please note that in Wikipedia, lists of people are lists of notable people. Per WP:LISTPEOPLE, a member of the list should meet the Wikipedia notability requirement or the person's membership in the list's group is established by reliable sources. For Harold Dolor, you have not provided any evidence of notability for inclusion on the list. Please do not add the name again unless you provide that. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at List of Saint Lucians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)