User talk:Paintball331

February 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Battle of Vimy Ridge. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have been given this warning because you have already been warned twice at User talk:184.147.105.208 for the same behaviour. Marianna251TALK 00:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Vimy Ridge. Marianna251TALK 00:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Battle of Vimy Ridge. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

Although I understand you want to depict truth, edits have to be both constructive and verifiable. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 01:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Canada men's national ice hockey team. Echoedmyron (talk) 01:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 01:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content in articles, as you did at Boeing 747 without citing a reliable source(s). Review the guidelines at Citing sources before making similar edits in the future. Thanks, -Fnlayson (talk) 20:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Discussion, please.
Hi. I see you're new to Wikipedia. I'd recommend that you start discussing what you'd like to edit by discussing it on the applicable talk pages. If you insist on pushing the same changes as you had before you might find yourself blocked again, and perhaps for a longer period. I'd really rather count you as a useful contributor and I'd hate to have you run off because of some misunderstandings of how things work here. Please discuss this. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 16:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)