User talk:Paintballxtreme

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Daniel Ortiz (Paintball Player). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Daniel_Ortiz_(Paintball_Player)&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Daniel Ortiz (Paintball Player)
Just wanted to clarify the guys name. In the page title he is "Daniel Ortiz", but on the page he is called "Daniel Oriz Mora". Should Or-iz be Or-t-iz. ie. "Daniel Ortiz Mora"? Regards, 220  of  Borg 03:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

-

Yes, his name is Daniel Ortiz Mora with "T" thanks for telling me about the error

More information needed about File:2012-doomsday-crash.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:2012-doomsday-crash.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:


 * 1) Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
 * 2) Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:08, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Daniel Ortiz (Paintball Player) ‎ into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Page move
The page you started at Daniel Ortiz (Paintball Player) has been moved to a new title; the old page exists as a pointer (a redirect) to the new article. Please make all future edits to Daniel Ortiz (paintball player). The page was moved to comply with Wikipedia's Manual of Style regarding capital letters in article titles. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Daniel Ortiz Mora


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Daniel Ortiz Mora. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Daniel Ortiz (paintball player). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Daniel Ortiz (paintball player) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —C.Fred (talk) 04:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Daniel Ortiz Mora with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Also, even if the page is moved, it will still be an orphan. Redirects do not count toward the "incoming links" to an article. Ortiz/Mora will need to be mentioned in some article other than the one about him for his article to no longer be an orphan. —C.Fred (talk) 04:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Ortiz (paintball player) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

About the Daniel Ortiz (Mora) article
Please explain here what you're trying to do with the article that's currently titled Daniel Ortiz (paintball player).


 * Are you trying to move it to a new title?
 * Are you trying to get it to not be tagged as an orphan?
 * Are you trying to create two articles about the same subject?

It's no longer clear what you're trying to do. Please explain here what you're trying to do so we can help. Your continued creation of duplicate articles and removal of maintenance tags is becoming disruptive and could lead to your account being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 04:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

-

The correct question is
 * Are you trying to get it to not be tagged as an orphan?

That's that i'm trying, please help me, i don't know why the article tagged as an orphan... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paintballxtreme (talk • contribs)


 * The article is tagged as an orphan because no other articles link to it. If there were an article on the South American Paintball Circuit and it linked to this article, then this article would no longer be an orphan.


 * Creating redirects or duplicate versions of the article do not cause it to cease to be an orphan. —C.Fred (talk) 04:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

--

The Paintball article have a link to the article of Daniel Ortiz, I really don't know why it is marked like orphan article...

Edit Warring
Since you are discussing your edits with a group of users, I am not going to block you for breaking the 3 revert rule. In the future please do not do it again. cheers --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  04:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:2012-doomsday-crash.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:2012-doomsday-crash.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MikeWazowski (talk) 07:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Paintball. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 07:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012 (continued)
Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Daniel Ortiz (paintball player), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. The maintenance templates are there to alert other editors to the issues and draw them in to help fix the problem. —C.Fred (talk) 14:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2012-doomsday-crash.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:2012-doomsday-crash.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 14:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Also, non-free images may not be used on user pages; they may only be used in articles. —C.Fred (talk) 14:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

One account per user
Greetings! Looking at your contributions, it appears that you are the same editor as. There is a general rule of one account per user. This is especially true if you are attempting to use multiple accounts to avoid a possible block, as it appears this account is doing.

Please pick one account or the other and use it exclusively. —C.Fred (talk) 14:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)


 * This is my account, that account isn't mine, please delete this article en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Ortiz_(paintball_player) it is a duplicate, the original is en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Ortiz_(Paintball_Player)


 * Actually, the original was Daniel Ortiz (paintball player). You incorrectly copied it to Daniel Ortiz (Paintball Player). Which means there will now likely be another template—a requested move—added to the rest at the top of the article. —C.Fred (talk) 15:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * It seems pretty obvious to me that CFred's idea that there's either some sock or meatpuppeting going on here is correct, so I've opened an investigation at Sockpuppet investigations/Paintballxtreme. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Fred one question, when I search in google "Daniel Ortiz paintball player" still appear the page that I ask for eliminate, the page never delete completely?


 * Google lags; it probably has an old version of it. —C.Fred (talk) 16:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Maintenance tags on Daniel Ortiz (paintball player)
Please restore the maintenance tags to the Daniel Ortiz (paintball player) article. Given the number of sources that aren't checking out and providing the claimed information, the maintenance tags need to be there so other editors know there are issues.

If you persist in removing them, it's likely your account will be blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 16:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

-

Ok but, when google update the page the last page would be eliminated? Because I don't want that when a person search for the bio of this guy see the page eliminated haha


 * That's Google's problem, not ours. We can't control how they update their index. —C.Fred (talk) 16:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for leave clear to me.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Enough with the template removal
This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Daniel Ortiz (paintball player), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

The failed verification tags (fv) flag items that aren't supported by the linked sources. Do not remove just the tags. Do feel free to explain where in the sources I can find the claims (e.g., his team's disqualification), because I didn't find anything about them. —C.Fred (talk) 16:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

---

Thanks again haha, this time I eliminate all, citation and flag.

An investigation was started into whether you're using two accounts
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Paintballxtreme. I did not open the investigation, although I do have some concerns about your editing and have commented in the discussion. I wanted to make sure you're aware that another editor has filed this report. —C.Fred (talk) 17:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I told you, I have only one account, the account "Ligavenezolana" is copying my article and is trying to make look like he create! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paintballxtreme (talk • contribs)


 * It's not my call at this point. It will be reviewed by a clerk to see if there's justification to move forward. It's possible that they will go forward with the investigation and find out exactly what you're asserting, that the other account is not related. It's also possible that they will find evidence that you're using both accounts—in which case the other account will be permanently blocked and this account may be temporarily blocked. I don't have access to what they look at, so I can't say until they go through their process. —C.Fred (talk) 17:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * What CFred said - if you're innocent, no harm, no foul. But this editing pattern looks incredibly suspicious - you have to understand, we've seen this countless times before, and it usually plays out the same way every time. MikeWazowski (talk) 17:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Look, his account was created yesterday, and look, he edit my article AGAIN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paintballxtreme (talk • contribs)


 * He edited the article. It is not your article; nobody has ownership of articles. —C.Fred (talk) 17:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

---

Ok sorry, he edited the article that I created... and now is creating new accounts, the new is "ligavenezolana2" wikipedia can't block his IP or something?


 * That's what the investigation will consider. —C.Fred (talk) 17:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

---

I just enter in his profile and his account is blocked, Thanks

16 January 2011
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Daniel Ortiz (paintball player) has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * As a reminder, you've already been warned about removing maintenance templates, and you can be blocked if you do that again. —C.Fred (talk) 02:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

The user ligavenezolana still editing the article of Daniel Ortiz... in one moment eliminate the references and I try to repair but I dont know why I can't...


 * Are you getting a message that you're autoblocked? —C.Fred (talk) 03:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

No, I found out that, the references wansn't removed, the "Reflist" citation was eliminated...

Nomination of Daniel Ortiz (paintball player) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Ortiz (paintball player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel Ortiz (paintball player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:47, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Daniel Ortiz (paintball player). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:45, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Daniel Ortiz (Paintballer), you may be blocked from editing. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The articles for deletion notice alerts all editors that a discussion about deleting the article is ongoing. It will need to stay up until the discussion is completed, which will take one to two weeks. —C.Fred (talk) 00:42, 18 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Please stop removing the failed verification tags from Daniel Ortiz (paintball player). Either find sources that do mention him or leave the tags alone.  GB fan 19:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Daniel Ortiz (paintball player), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. GB fan 23:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 00:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Daniel Ortiz (paintball player)‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GB fan 02:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Ortiz (paintball player), you may be blocked from editing. MikeWazowski (talk) 04:26, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Repost of Daniel Ortiz (paintball player)
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I have deleted Daniel Ortiz (paintball player) because it is not substantially different from the prior version. If you can explain what substantial changes to the article (e.g., new reliable sources) have been made, I will recreate the article. Otherwise, you can appeal my speedy deletion to WP:Deletion review, but please do not create any further articles about Ortiz. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 17:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

This warning was also given to ; you appear to be controlling both accounts. You may not use alternate accounts to avoid sanctions. —C.Fred (talk) 18:00, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at José Daniel Ortiz, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MikeWazowski (talk) 00:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:37, 4 February 2012 (UTC)