User talk:Pajz/Archive/2014

I'm confused
I'm confused about https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AVillage_pump_%28policy%29&diff=627807417&oldid=627806860 your edit]. It soudns like you are concerned about delivering this material to the people who write to us. I agree, but I don't see that suggestion. I see two proposed location for the information, both addressed to editors and agent. Did I miss something?-- S Philbrick (Talk)  13:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Sphilbrick, well, the two sections are titled "What OTRS volunteers can do for you" and "What OTRS volunteers will not do for you" (emphasis mine), plus Volunteer Response Team is the central page about OTRS. Of course the information is, on a deeper level, addressed to both editors and agents (mainly agents). But it is phrased like it's addressed to people who write to OTRS, and it is posted at a place where people who write to OTRS will read it. I don't think that is a good idea. I think it would be a much better idea to talk specifically to the OTRS agents. Does that clarify it? — Pajz (talk) 13:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes it does, thanks. I agree. I'd support a rewrite.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  13:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm rewriting: it'll be there tonight.  DGG ( talk ) 16:49, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

OTRS and COI
I have posted to several places (VTR, PUMP, FTNB) that I believe a clear and prominent policy is needed stating edits by OTRS team members driven/suggested/inspired by secret OTRS correspondence with a party that has a COI require disclosure as COI influenced on the talk page of the article edited. Please comment as you see fit. Discussion with Rjd0060 has been cut off and has not provided satisfactory resolution in the opinion of myself and. Your input would be valuable and may provide insight/clarification from the OTRS admin perspective. This issue has been discussed in several places, notably ANI. Best. - - MrBill3 (talk) 19:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)