User talk:PaleAqua/Sentry (draft)

, I've added a little formatting and corrected a few perceived typos. I'd argue that a bad short term page protection is less harmful to the encyclopedia than blocking as users can still submit WP:PER requests and it is more effective in dealing with disagreements usually than block is. That said, I haven't changed that bit yet (even to fix the typos) until there can be a little discussion. —  22:52, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the fix ups. Yeah debating the protection bit myself before deciding to leave it out of my draft at start. PaleAqua (talk) 23:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The main bit is I think that this right really shouldn't be used for "disagreements" only for obvious spam and vandalism, not disagreements and edit wars. I worry that page protection would turn it more into a moderator type roll which should have higher requirements. PaleAqua (talk) 23:31, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't use of it in a "moderator" type capacity be misuse of the right and result in removal? —   23:39, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Exactly, which is why I think page protection is probably not a first pass feature. The temptation to misuse it would be higher and the use case for page protection against vandals ( a sock hopping, IP address hoping vandal, a meat puppetry, etc. ) seems like it is better dealt with via reporting which could result in edit filters etc. as needed. PaleAqua (talk) 23:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * An oversighter that page protection is the better option. —   23:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah I saw that, interesting. PaleAqua (talk) 01:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)