User talk:PalestineRemembered/Archives/2009/February

MfD nomination of User:PalestineRemembered/Cheating
User:PalestineRemembered/Cheating, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PalestineRemembered/Cheating and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:PalestineRemembered/Cheating during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ironholds (talk) 15:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

No 0RR??
Going through Requests_for_comment/Arbitration_enforcement and will start commenting soon. But your entry made me realize? that "0RR" means - NO reverts??? That's crazy. Did I read you right? Thanks. CarolMooreDC (talk) 17:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You read that right - see this TalkPage section Mohammed al-Dura where the utter chaos caused by 0RR is discussed. PRtalk 19:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Inclusion
Thank you for your support with respect to the lead change; it was good to see your edit summary. But please note that it'll probably be overlooked unless you add it to the talk page at either the end of this section, or the end of this section.

Please keep it brief; I've learned the hard way that when I make my comments long they often become weaker. I'm saying this because for example, IronDuke could argue that Kasaalan's comment in that section doesn't show any support for the neutral lead (because it didn't directly address the subject and talks about other topics).

I know we've fought in the past, and I apologize for the times I was too harsh in my responses to you. But I hope this present predicament shows that I'm not your enemy - I only want to keep the article neutral, about Rachel Corrie, and as strong as possible. arimareiji (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I'll ask this time
Can I ask that you have User:PalestineRemembered/Saeb Erekat deleted. Users are not meant to keep 'laundry lists' on other users unless (and this is a rare exception) it is being/is about to be used in an RfC/ArbCom case, and even then it is borderline. Since the page in question has not been edited since October 2008 (and therefore obviously isn't being maintained for an imminent case) it is inappropriate, and I would appreciate it if you request that it be deleted or I will have to take it to AfD. Ironholds (talk) 18:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not pushing any kind of agenda; I'm not a fan of such things in 'anyone's'' userspace regardless of what their opinion is on whatever matter (I know you haven't accused me of having one, but I'd just like to clarify my stance is anti-dirty laundry in userspace rather than anti-zionist or anti-palestinian). Ironholds (talk) 09:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:PalestineRemembered/Saeb Erekat
User:PalestineRemembered/Saeb Erekat, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PalestineRemembered/Saeb Erekat and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:PalestineRemembered/Saeb Erekat during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ironholds (talk) 07:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Pachyderm
The SmashTheState MfD, you mean? Ironholds (talk) 11:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

WP:ANI
Deleting other users' comments seems to be, at the VERY least, incredibly rude. I've referred it to WP:ANI, since he seems to be completely rejecting consensus. If he's removed multiple comments, please add the diffs showing this. GrizzledOldMan (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well done for taking it to ANI, I was going to add "This article has really major POV problems, maintained by heavy-weight OWNERSHIP (of the article and the TalkPage). We treat this Holocaust Survivor, IDF veteran and Israeli professor extremely badly, failing to give his views any kind of NPOV treatment, while allowing his ideological enemies to be extremely rude about him. It's particularly instructive to compare his biography with much less well-qualified and trustworthy people such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali, whom we treat much better than we do Shahak" except that, as sometimes happens, Nishidani got there first and did a much better job than I could do! PRtalk 21:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Found it:


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk#Others.27_comments


 * GrizzledOldMan (talk) 21:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

ANI
Hi, thanks for your comment. Please confine the discussion to the appropriate page so that others can participate. Thanks. --Ryan Delaney talk 15:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Congratulations for the barnstar you received from Orion777! ☺ Coppertwig (talk) 01:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thankyou for drawing my attention to it! The intention is genuine enough, and I'd like to think I have more fans than I know of. There is a new book out this year from the son of a survivor, it's only so long the denial can continue. PRtalk 09:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Orion seems to be a rather blatant Henry Winkle-less sockpuppet/meatpuppet, hence the barnstar from a new user. Luckily he has the subtlety of a paving stone through the front window, so it is all well and good. Ironholds (talk) 20:39, 18 February 2009 (UTC)