User talk:Pallavidevpriya

Proposed deletion of Kunwar Pranjal Pratap Singh
Hello, Pallavidevpriya. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kunwar Pranjal Pratap Singh, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pranjal Singh has been reverted. Your edit here to Pranjal Singh was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spEZIOTkRoU, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oe_StATuUwM) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:20, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Pranjal Singh have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Your edit here to Pranjal Singh was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spEZIOTkRoU, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYoAUsp5SOA, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmckdqPSBVA, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xd5kr89ZZoo&t=372s, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFgG-0ZvQYU, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spEZIOTkRoU, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBAFv1Q1B3c, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGwFdfCEDXk) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:30, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pranjal Singh


A tag has been placed on Pranjal Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Jennica ✿ / talk 21:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jennica ✿ / talk 21:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Pranjal Singh, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. –CaroleHenson (talk) 00:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Pranjal Singh
Hello, Pallavidevpriya,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Pranjal Singh should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Pranjal Singh.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

–CaroleHenson (talk) 10:40, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Pranjal Singh, you may be blocked from editing. –CaroleHenson (talk) 17:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)


 * This is different than a Prod delete tag, that can be removed if the article is improved and meets guidelines for an article, or speedy delete. In this case, there will be a discussion and ultimate decision based upon input. The tag must remain until the discussion is closed.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Pranjal Singh. –CaroleHenson (talk) 19:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

 * , the user (and suspected sockpuppets) seems to have learned nothing by being blocked temporarily and is back removing the AfD tags. . Of course, the discussion is still going to take place. Thoughts?–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Yunshui 雲 水 15:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)