User talk:Palonma Picardo

April 2024
Hello Palonma Picardo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Palonma Picardo. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 10:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello 331dot, thank you for your message. I understand your concern, but I want to clarify that I do not have any undisclosed financial stake in promoting the topic of mobile printing. I am genuinely interested in the subject matter and have been researching it independently.
 * The articles I found provide valuable insights into the industry, including both positive aspects and criticisms of certain products. As such, I believe they would contribute to a balanced and informative Wikipedia page on mobile printing.
 * I apologize if my editing activity gave the impression of undisclosed paid advocacy. I assure you that this is not the case. I will ensure to follow Wikipedia's guidelines and make any necessary disclosures in the future.
 * Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and I look forward to contributing constructively to Wikipedia.
 * Best regards,
 * Palonma Picardo Palonma Picardo (talk) 11:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 331dot. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Digital stamp have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 11:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello 331dot, thank you for your message. I understand your concern, but I want to clarify that I do not have any undisclosed financial stake in promoting the topic of mobile printing. I am genuinely interested in the subject matter and have been researching it independently.
 * The articles I found provide valuable insights into the industry, including both positive aspects and criticisms of certain products. As such, I believe they would contribute to a balanced and informative Wikipedia page on mobile printing.
 * I apologize if my editing activity gave the impression of undisclosed paid advocacy. I assure you that this is not the case. I will ensure to follow Wikipedia's guidelines and make any necessary disclosures in the future.
 * Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and I look forward to contributing constructively to Wikipedia.
 * Best regards, Palonma Picardo (talk) 11:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * What is your relationship with COLOP Digital? Please do not use an AI to generate your replies; I would like to communicate with you directly, not an AI. That will be the case with most people on Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 11:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't work for Colop Digital, if that's what you want to know.
 * Additionally, I'd like to mention that Spanish is my native language, which is why I utilize AI tools to ensure accurate writing. Palonma Picardo (talk) 12:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Do you work in the field of mobile printing, even if not for COLOP Digital? I'm just trying to determine if you have a conflict of interest.  People don't just usually perform research about a particular company at random- there is usually some sort of connection to it.
 * Talk page communication is not expected to have perfect spelling, grammar, and style. We'd all prefer to just hear from you, thanks. If you don't feel you can adequately communicate with us without using an AI, you may want to consider editing the Spanish Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 12:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I worked in the past in the accounting area of a company dedicated to mobile printing, Colop and Trodat was two of our competitors.
 * Mobile printing is a topic that excites me and about which I have some information.
 * I realized that it is a topic about which there is almost no information on Wikipedia and I wanted to make a contribution on the topic.
 * I was writing about Colop Digital in my sandbox and tried to make it as neutral as possible.
 * In addition, I was also preparing an article about RMPT technology (The Random Movement Printing Technology).
 * I was also trying to translate the TroGroup page on Wikipedia, which is Colop's competitor, they have direct links to their website and the truth is that their page does not sound very neutral.
 * https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/TroGroup
 * In conclusion, I am interested in the topic and I want to make contributions, of course I want to do it in an absolutely neutral way and respecting Wikipedia's policies.
 * I would greatly appreciate your help, your tips and all the information you can give me. Palonma Picardo (talk) 13:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The German Wikipedia has very different policies than the English Wikipedia, and what is considered acceptable there is not necessarily acceptable here. If it doesn't sound neutral to you, it probably isn't.
 * Regarding the draft about COLOP, it is exclusively sourced to the company website; this is not acceptable for establishing that the company meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Any article about COLOP should primarily summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage choose on their own to say about the company and what makes it important/significant/influential as a company. It should not merely summarize the activities of the company or document its existence.  Lastly, awards- espcially niche industry awards- should not be mentioned unless the award itself has an article(like Academy Award or Nobel Peace Prize). 331dot (talk) 13:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If you have gathered at least three independent reliable sources that give the company significant coverage, those should be summarized in any article about it, then you can submit it for a review. 331dot (talk) 13:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information, I will do so and then submit it for a review.
 * best regards
 * Palonma 2A00:801:737:A617:BC22:C6C5:5839:67D2 (talk) 14:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the information, I will do so and then submit it for a review.
 * best regards
 * Palonma 195.189.27.77 (talk) 14:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, just remember to log in when you are posting so your posts are properly attributed to you. 331dot (talk) 15:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)