User talk:Palrajputs

February 2024
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pal (surname), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 07:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Pal (surname), you may be blocked from editing. ''Please try to understand how to cite sources before further editing in Wikipedia! Moreover, certain changes require consensus on the article talk page; read WP:CONSENSUS!'' Ekdalian (talk) 11:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi,
 * I understand your concern regarding the sources used in my edit. I would like to let you know the links joined with my addition is of Indian government followed with gov.in as the domain officially owned by indian government in which everything i edit can be traced. You can check it by yourself too. Thanks. Palrajputs (talk) 11:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * No, you need to cite proper reliable sources as per our policies. We don't even consider such unsourced content. Read WP:BURDEN! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 13:24, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Sir,
 * I have read the citation paragraph giving information about the correct way to add the sources. The page i was editing is about an Indian community and the best published source is the offical de-classified files of the Indian Government. I dont think one would be able to find a more reliable source than the respective Government itself. Palrajputs (talk) 14:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pal (surname). Ekdalian (talk) 09:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste and related articles
Ekdalian (talk) 11:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 10:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sangama dynasty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''Tampering with sourced content is not acceptable here! Be careful, and stop unsourced POV pushing.'' Ekdalian (talk) 12:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gadaria people. Ekdalian (talk) 12:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Gadaria people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ekdalian (talk) 12:26, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Understood your concern, the next time i will attach the source of information on the talk page prior to making an edit. Palrajputs (talk) 12:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * one more thing on the gwalior fort page i added a thing about Suraj sen which was already available on that page you reverted that too. Why did you do that? Palrajputs (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Please check the edit summary! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 18:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The reason provide by you was that the information was unsourced, but on the gwalior fort page there itself it is written what i added on the suraj sen page. Which clearly is right according to wikipedia as the source was the wikipedia page itself. Palrajputs (talk) 04:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia articles can never be used as sources. Doug Weller  talk 09:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pal Kshatriyas (Gadaria)
Hello, Palrajputs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pal Kshatriyas (Gadaria), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)