User talk:Pana ivan

Image copyright problem with Image:Sariegi.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Sariegi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:18, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Ndoye25.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ndoye25.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 21:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Manucho Gonçalves
Why do you believe that the image of Manucho needs changing? The original image was of a good size, and was also taken from a good angle. Furthermore, it had been cropped to a sensible shape for the infobox. Please respond on my talk page. – PeeJay 23:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I have reverted the picture again. Please discuss why you believe the picture needs changing.Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 00:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Again, please discuss why you think the picture needs changing. Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 01:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for explaining why you were changing the picture, but why didn't you do that sooner, rather than having the picture reverted 4 or 5 times? Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 11:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate Image:Maunucho debut.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Maunucho debut.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Maunucho debut.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Maunucho debut.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:32, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Your uploaded images
Hi. You have been busy uploading images of football (soccer, I'm American) players that look quite professional. Are you a professional photographer for the team or some news organization or have some special access to field level? Do you have larger resolution images? Or did you just find these images on a website and then uploaded them here? You may reply here or on my talk page. Thanks. MECU ≈ talk 16:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

To transfer your pictures on the French-speaking Wikipedia
Hello. I am a user of French-speaking Wikipedia. I saw that your images were of a very high quality. So, I would like to seek your permission to transfer these images on the the French Wikipedia. It would be really good if you accept my request. Thank you, in advance. Esperanza222 (talk) 17:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Gonzalez-kalamaria.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gonzalez-kalamaria.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Your other uploads have been listed there as well. Please provide more complete source information on your image uploads. Thank you. --Mosmof (talk) 05:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Josh Freeman 2007.jpg


The file File:Josh Freeman 2007.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)