User talk:Panasonic91

March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Livonia, Michigan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 16:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Livonia, Michigan constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks.  Stwalkerster  [  talk  ]  17:51, 22 March 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Livonia, Michigan. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Stwalkerster  [  talk  ]  18:39, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Bigfoot sightings

 * Hi! If you want to add information which appears to someone on the other side of the world to be vandalism, then my recomendation is that you re-add the information, ONLY when you have found a reliable source to prove it. Citing the online news article in which it appears would be the most suitable method of doing this.  Stwalkerster  [  talk  ]  17:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia:Verifiability basically sums up why it needs to be referenced.  Stwalkerster  [  talk  ]  17:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I hope some of these links help you get to grips with more of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Stwalkerster  [  talk  ]  17:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia. Seddon69 (talk) 18:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ♦Tangerines♦ · Talk 18:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Leroy Hubbard
A tag has been placed on Leroy Hubbard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ros0709 (talk) 23:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Clarenceville School District has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 19:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Clarenceville School District constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u  |  t  20:20, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ukexpat (talk) 13:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

HI
Are you from Clarenceville? And who do you think you could be? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boxstaa (talk • contribs) 02:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

March 2009
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Oli Filth(talk 21:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Oli Filth(talk 22:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Clarenceville School District
Hi, I have removed the sex tape scandal section from Clarenceville School District since it does not have a source to backup the allegations. The information you posted could damage the careers/lives of the people indicated. If you can find a reliable source to backup your allegations, you may return the information to the article.

I also removed Bob Sagat from the article since he graduated from a high school in suburban Philly and not from Clarenceville. Clinton Moore was removed because being on YouTube does not make one notable.Coaster1983 (talk) 23:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

March 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Celestra (talk) 00:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Celestra (talk) 00:12, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Celestra (talk) 00:17, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Atlan (talk) 09:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerene talk 11:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)