User talk:Panchoytoro

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:


 * Be Bold!
 * Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nice with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~ ; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! -- Runcorn 22:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

The Wall
Please stop saying The Wall is certified at 23x platinum for sales of 23 million copies. It isn't. The RIAA double counts double albums as of 1999, meaning The Wall is certified at 23x platinum for sales of 11.5 million copies. If you had visited the talk page, you would have seen that. Thanks. 74.77.208.52 07:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Wish You Were Here & Animals
I appreciate the interest and enthusiasm you have in updating the Pink Floyd entries, but please prove that the latest round of CDs (especially with Wish You Were Here and Animals) are from 1997 and not from 1992. It says Copyright 1992 *right on the discs*. Again, nothing personal, but please prove it. Otherwise I will keep reverting back to 1992. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucifer Spam (talk • contribs) 16:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of A Day At The Races Tour
I have nominated A Day At The Races Tour, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/A Day At The Races Tour. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rwiggum (Talk /Contrib ) 14:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Britney Spears has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Minkus (talk) 19:51, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Half-Penny, Two-Penny


The article Half-Penny, Two-Penny has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable. Didn't chart; not covered.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash;Wrathchild (talk) 18:13, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:Imnotminkus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. F orenti talk 07:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Rwiggum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ibn (talk) 07:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User:Wrathchild. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. F orenti talk 07:42, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to User:Imnotminkus. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. F orenti talk 07:44, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. JoJan (talk) 08:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Fool's Overture for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fool's Overture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fool's Overture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 16:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)