User talk:Panda Girl/Archive 1

September 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Nickelodeon, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. DK  qwerty     04:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to ICarly. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:55, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm Kirachinmoku. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Sam & Cat episodes, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kira Chinmoku 20:41, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:40, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia mobile feedback
My name is Kenan. I am the product manager for Wikipedia Mobile. I noticed that you've been editing regularly on mobile and I'd love to ask you some questions and get your feedback on Wikipedia on mobile. This would be a great chance to affect the way that we build our website and apps.

Thanks!

KWang (WMF) (talk) 23:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:23, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ariana Grande. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  STATic  message me!  23:54, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ariana Grande discography, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ruby  Murray  21:44, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ariana Grande discography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ruby  Murray  19:16, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Edit-warring
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Ariana Grande discography. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Ruby  Murray  19:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ariana Grande discography. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ruby   Murray  22:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

December 2013
Please stop disrupting the Billboard 200 article. Wikipedia is neutral, meaning there is no reason why only the years 2012 and 2013 should be highlighted over all others with additional links. The article itself has a template (as well as another wikilink) which would bring the reader to any/all years. No need for "contemporary" years to be given more weight than others. Thanks. Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Billboard 200, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - eo (talk) 18:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Ariana Grande, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is only a final warning since I see you have been warned quite frequently for disruptive editing, so it might be time to stop.  STATic  message me!  02:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Last warning, if you make another edit to Ariana Grande or Ariana Grande discography with looks like it could be continuing the edit war, without a clear consensus (agreement among other editors) on the article's talk page. I will block you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ariana Grande, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Way (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Your recent editing history at Ariana Grande shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  STATic  message me!  00:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  STATic  message me!  00:53, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule&#32;at Ariana Grande. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 02:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vevo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Womanizer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Ariana Grande discography. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.  STATic  message me!  05:08, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * You were blocked back in January for your edit warring on the Ariana Grande discography article. I strongly suggest that you discuss the changes you want to make on the talk page and work to get consensus, but do not make the edits to the article again until consensus is reached—not now, and not 24 hours from now. —C.Fred (talk) 05:14, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Well, user:C.Fred not is necessary make conseus for tha changes i made. Please see Taylor Swift discography, the Grande's christmas song not are singles. I don't remove text, i don't add text, i clean and corrected the section, not is necesary make conseous for this.
 * Not are singles, but user Static not want to understand. Connie (A.K) (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You are trying to make a change to content that is opposed by other editors; yes, consensus applies here. Reclassifying a song as not a single is a substantive edit. —C.Fred (talk) 05:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, in reply to your comment at my talk page:
 * Please, tell me What is the template to let you know I left you a message?
 * The Talkback template is mentioned in the header at the top of my talk page. (I'm now watching your user talk page, so I'll see any further replies you leave me here; you don't need to worry about a talkback or a Mention.) —C.Fred (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks.
 * no, I corrected, is the first editor by the correct edition? I think no. I explained my changes. The songs not are singles. This case is similar to Taylor Swift discography, already saw?. Sorry for my english, serious. Connie (A.K) (talk) 05:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Other stuff exists. The situation for Swift may not be the same for Grande. I suggest you find a secondary source that states conclusively that the songs charted even though they were not released as singles to support your position for this article. —C.Fred (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 22 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Austin Mahone discography page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=596665932 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F596665932%7CAustin Mahone discography%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for February 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ariana Grande, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Stefan2 (talk) 14:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Your revert on List of Sam & Cat episodes
You reverted an edit for lack of a source. For contents of an aired TV show the show itself is a published primary source reference for its own contents. I don't care either way about the info you removed - editorial choice. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:33, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Geraldo Perez, Yes, but i think Cosgrove not appears in the episode. Connie (A.K) (talk) 15:42, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I didn't watch the episode so I will take your word for it. We probably shouldn't add casting info to an article unless the actor actually appeared in the credits, a much easier thing to verify than watching the complete TV show and visually identifying actors. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ariana Grande discography, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me!   22:07, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ariana Grande discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STATic message me!   03:19, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
 * STATic, Hey! Stop, my edit now have source, so wrong notification. The song is confirmed, all is confirmed, and the song will be released maybe at March 20.  But, whatever, Apparently your life is only internet all day and spy my edits all day, you have something personal to me? I can see that your only spy my edits with obssessed... you can't do this with a new user who wants help in the encyclopedia.. you can't spy my edits all the time, I have good intentions with the project. It's annoying that someone is chasing editions, you're the only one who does this, please stop!. don't worry, but, please, don't put in my talk page wrong notifications, okay?. Thanks. Connie (A.K) (talk) 03:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ariana Grande discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me!   04:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 17:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)


 * You were previously blocked for adding material without backing it up with reliable sources, and you're at it again in the Ariana Grande article. I strongly suggest that you do not add material to that article or any others unless you have a reliable source to back it up and you cite it in the edit. —C.Fred (talk) 04:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * C.Fred this have reference in the section yours truly.. and see The Way (Ariana Grande song) and Yours Truly (Ariana Grande album). Thanks. Connie (A.K) (talk) 05:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The problem is, the reference immediately following the change does not support the change. You're claiming that http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop-shop/1902870/ariana-grande-previews-baby-i-single-announces-tour-dates says the album went double platinum, but that article does not. —C.Fred (talk) 10:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * C.Fred, check my edition again please. And tell me what is the problem now. Thanks. Connie (A.K) (talk) 18:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * With the new sources, the text is properly cited. There is a concern of whether the text belongs in the introduction, but that's a matter of editorial taste and choice rather than compliance with the WP:Verifiability guideline. —C.Fred (talk) 18:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok. Thanks. Connie (A.K) (talk) 20:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

More unsourced edits
I've reverted your edit to Ariana Grande. I checked the source, and there is no nomination category for fan clubs/groups or celebrities. —C.Fred (talk) 17:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * C.Fred check the nick twitter. Connie (A.K) (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Twitter is a source to be careful with. The published source that was already cited in the article didn't mention the category, and the article it linked to, which claimed to have a full nomination list, didn't include that category. Remember that the burden of proof is on the editor who makes the change: if you change the nomination, provide the new source. (Also, don't delete an existing nomination which is provided by the source, as you did in the same edit.) —C.Fred (talk) 19:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, i delete one category because that isn't belong in the Grande's article. The category belong only in the serie. Connie (A.K) (talk) 03:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Austin Mahone discography. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  03:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Ok. Thanks Davey. Regards. Connie (A.K) (talk) 12:44, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * You're welcome lol, Edit warring can obviously get your arse blocked in no time and well we don't want that :) ,
 * Just discuss the issue with Shane, If he doesn't cooperate you can then report him, but as I said it's generally best to discuss first :)
 * Happy Editing :)
 * Regards, - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  13:24, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Davey2010 thanks for your words. I think you are the third user with who somebody can talk and discuss in good terms, and don't only put authomatic messages (warnings messages) and then threat. C Fred, Geraldo Perez and you are the coolest users at the moment to me in this wiki, because know treat others partners. PS: I don't wanna more problems, for this i don't think talk with Shane, but, thanks again for your words. Im feel better. Regards. Connie (A.K) (talk) 22:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome :), Arr thanks :), I don't see the point templating when everyone can discuss :)
 * Well alls I'll say is Ignore Shane for now and just help build an encyclopedia :)
 * Thanks for the kind words :)
 * Regards, - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  22:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Secret (Austin Mahone album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. STATic message me!   02:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh sorry, i just haven't intention, i just reverted some info irrelevant on the article. Connie (A.K) (talk) 02:17, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Problem (Ariana Grande song). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. IPadPerson (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

April 30, 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Problem (Ariana Grande song), you may be blocked from editing. STATic message me!   01:47, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I am just editing. And is logic that was released on april 28 Worldwide, if peaked number one on 40 countries and top ten is 60 countries and more, is so obvious, on ibtimes said that and the source is there, the song was released on april 28. But, whatever :D.!!!. Lol Connie (A.K) (talk) 02:08, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Are you implying that in the entire world we have 100 countries? You would be far off if that was the case. In the IBTimes source it does not say the song was released Worldwide so it is WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. The current cited source only was for the United States and you knew that when you edited it. STATic message me!   02:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * No i don't knew it, and im busy now with friends, so bye, i haven't time this moment to talk online, sorry. Connie (A.K) (talk) 02:24, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Ariana Grande. IPadPerson (talk) 15:33, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * IPadPerson, isn't original reserch, tell me that i need find a better source, but don't that i made a original research because is a lie. I cited a source. Regards. Connie (A.K) (talk) 15:51, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, Connie. This warning was out of line. Drmies (talk) 23:38, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ariana Grande shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me!   21:07, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Iggy Azalea discography. STATic message me!   22:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * i didn't blank page content, i fixed the article, i explain my edits.. and... i think this "warning message" not be used for good faith's edits. Regards. Connie (A.K) (talk) 02:08, 27 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Could you explain, then, this edit to Iggy Azalea discography? "Just country" doesn't really explain why you deleted a chart from the table. —C.Fred (talk) 02:32, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * .Yes of course. Just countries being on the tables (10 countries) according to the format. Regards. Connie (A.K) (talk) 02:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * So why did you leave the two US non-pop charts? It makes no sense to cherry-pick like that. —C.Fred (talk) 02:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Because i was searching countries where The New Classic has been positioned. I found that now. This the result: see. Regards. Connie (A.K) (talk) 02:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Laun chba  ller  17:05, 1 June 2014 (UTC) Thanks for notice me. The user anom was revert for other editors, see. Please, can you explain to the user that only countries can be on the tables according to the format. Thanks. Regards. Connie (A.K) (talk) 17:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 5 days for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Iggy Azalea discography. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Iggy Azalea discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me!   17:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. STATic message me!   17:25, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Why do not you want them to be countries in the tables?. And "Black Widow" has to be released. Connie (A.K) (talk) 17:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Austin Mahone discography
Hi ConnieGB,

I've noticed that you keep reverting my edit to the Austin Mahone discography. I've tried twice to create a Promotional Singles section, as "11:11", "Heart in My Hand" and "U" were never released as main singles. I understand why you believe that they are, as they were released as "singles" in iTunes. However, this does not mean that they are official singles. Many album tracks are often released on iTunes as promotional singles with their own cover art, without being official singles.

"11:11" and "Heart in My Hand" were released as a promotional singles in the lead up to the Extended Play EP release, however the official lead single was "Say Somethin".

"U" was released as a promotional single for Valentine's day, but was never announced as an official single.

If it is alright with you, I would like to move these songs back to where they belong. Let me know what you think.

Regards, RobbgieG2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbieg2012 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The songs was released as singles on itunes. Regards. Connie (A.K) (talk) 16:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Correct - as promotional singles. Just because a song is released individually on iTunes, that doesn't mean it's an official single. Just like Lady Gaga's "Hair", Jennifer Lopez's "Girls", Chris Brown's "Calypso" and "Get Down", every track off of Justin Bieber's "Journals" (just to name a few, I could go on forever). Please try to understand, as it is frustrating to see the page be incorrect. Thank you. Robbieg2012 (talk)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:35, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 01:36, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Bbb23, I did not use two accounts at the same time in an article. Twice forgot the old password of the main account. When I found the password in the notes on my phone, I decided to only use that account (Eliluu) on this wiki and not this. So I ditched the old account from blocking two weeks by a user Lord Roem, and I decided to just use the account Eliluu. I think should not block indefinitely this account (ConnieGB) if I didn't nothing wrong. Sorry for my english, i can't speak very well. So, please, unblock this account because i didn't use this account after the two weeks block by Lord Roem, i didn't use because i left this account in this wiki to use only the account Eliluu after two weeks block,, isn't necessary the indefinity block to this account because i didn't nothing wrong to the other (Eliluu) and didn't use this account to edit after two weeks block. Thanks & regards Connie (A.K) (talk) 22:03, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I've changed the block to indefinite because this account is the puppet account, not the master. That account was blocked for one week.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:56, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * What you're saying is not accurate. First, this account was blocked for two weeks for disruptive editing on June 21. That means it expired on July 5. Yet you used the other account on July 3 and 4. That means you evaded your block with the master account. And at least in some instances were reverted after having been blocked for edit warring and disruptive editing. Your block log on this account in 2014 is replete with blocks, which indicates to me that you are not a productive editor. In my view, you were lucky that another administator chose to block the master for only a week. I would have blocked both accounts indefinitely. Second, although generally - not always - the two accounts don't edit on the same days, they criss-cross going back quite some time. I see no reason to unblock you, and if you persist in the same kind of disruptive editing with the Eliluu account after that short block expires, that account will probably be blocked indefinitely. Another administrator will review your unblock request, but, at a minimum, they should bear in mind that this account is the puppet; the other account is the master.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:29, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I did not know exactly when finished blocking this account. So I accidentally used the other two or one day before. My intention was not to evade, and if you think that, I apologize, my intention was not to evade. I've had other blocks before and I have not created accounts to evade blocks. Please presumed good faith, I apologize again. Yes, thanks for the warning, the only problem with my edits is the rule of three reverts articles, i promise that will never happen again. Thanks for your message. Regards. Connie (A.K) (talk) 23:04, 11 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much Yamla :). Connie (talk) 23:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Engin Akyürek without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''You should search a bit before removing a content. It is restored with a reliable source now. '' Mona778 (talk) 01:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi. I explained why i removed it. You should explain your edits too, so i can understand your revert :). Thank you and regards. Connie (talk) 01:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)