User talk:Pandit4580

January 2016
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kashyapa, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 03:13, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Bhumihars
Hi, as far as Wikipedia is concerned, the Bhumihars are not Brahmins. That they claim to be is pure vanity and we do not subscribed to such things, sorry. That is one of the main reasons why the main article about them has restrictions on who can contribute but you can see numerous past discussions on its talk page. - Sitush (talk) 03:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

You are taking Wikipedia is the father of earth, he is responsible for the everything , he knows everything , By the way According to Wikipedia

Only four caste in hinduism Brahmins Kshatriya Vaish Shudra

According to Vedas ,mahabharat ,ramayan Also says four caste in hinduism ,,,, So where is bhumihar ?

Bhumihar is not caste, it is subdivision of Brahmin.... Bhumihar is subcaste not caste, like maithili ,saryupareen ,chitpawan etc

This is popular term among Brahmins in Bihar ,they are not going to take alms , This is the main difference because they are zamindars. Land given by parshurama.


 * I am well aware of the two caste concepts (that varna = caste and that jati = caste). In the context that you were editing it really makes no difference: the consensus on Wikipedia has been that Bhumihars are not Brahmins, whether you consider that to be a subcaste or a jati-caste. Yes, it is true that they have made claims to Brahmin status and that is noted in the relevant article; that someone makes a claim doesn't make it right and the vast majority of reliable sources reject it in this instance. As I think I said earlier, there are loads of discussions about this on the article talk page. - Sitush (talk) 12:28, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

See you are talking like children , Varna and jati Tell me varna of bhumihar ? Okay if you don't know, then who gives you right to make him another caste , now today's people decide who is bhumihar ?

You don't know so many things but it doesn't mean that they doesn't exist.

Why bhumihar brahmin needs to be claim, they are Brahmins ,even better Brahmin than others but if you are trying to deviate their community then they need to be claim ,

Who is given you right to deviate social status of any community. And how can you judge it with some jealousy people and negative comments then you are totally wrong.

If you don't know something about someone, it doesn't mean get information from wrong sources.

If I ask you something about types of Brahmin You will go through Wikipedia , Wikipedia not created Brahmin community and not know properly, they provide less than 1 % information about terms hence no rights to judge him and take decisions ,

But if large section of community living in society saying that they are zamindars, land owning Brahmin , Brahmin king etc.

He needs to be listen, provide appropriate contents.

Who is bloody rascal made false comments, bhumihars are offspring of Brahmin and rajput. This is a abusive language, you need to be published. How dare you to do that, do you know what that means ? Bloody rascal.

You can do anything it doesn't mean that whatever others says write their.

January 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kashyapa. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 05:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mangal Pandey. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sitush (talk) 11:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mangal Pandey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 14:48, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sharma, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 11:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Pandey. Since January, you have been requested to provide sources while adding content multiple times. The next time you add any unsourced content, you will be blocked from editing. utcursch &#124; talk 15:22, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

You have yet again inserted into an article your unsourced opinion related to the Bhumihar community. This time it is at Mangal Pandey. Enough is enough: I suggest that you take note of the information in the notice above and that you abide by our policies and guidelines. - Sitush (talk) 15:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please see WP:NOTHERE. Wikipedia is not a platform to establish the Brahmin status of your caste. If you want to start a discussion about changing "Bhumihar" to "Bhumihar Brahmin" in articles, use a Request for Comment. Don't do that without discussion. utcursch &#124; talk 18:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

We don't need your illogical thoughts, if you don't know something , then don't try to deviate people's. who I am, no one knows better than us. Brahmin is a Varna not Caste you fool. And what do you think yourself, Wikipedia is deciding who I'm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandit4580 (talk • contribs)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pandey. Sitush (talk) 20:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Then who are you to decide what is correct or not, what others says that is right and we are wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandit4580 (talk • contribs)


 * See WP:V, WP:RS and WP:CONSENSUS. What you think is irrelevant when stacked up against those. Don't like it? Then go express your dislike somewhere else on the web - it's a big place and has room for you. - Sitush (talk) 20:23, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Tell me Varna of Bhumihar Caste ??

As per Hindu Mythology, Only Four Varnas Brahmin Kshatriya Vaishyas Shudra

No place for Bhumihar Varna. Because it is a Sub Caste of Brahmin like Saryuparin, sakaldwipia , maithli etc

Then how Bhumihar is separated from Brahmin. This is irrelevant thoughts you are trying to impose through Wikipedia.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandit4580 (talk • contribs)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Bhumihar. Sitush (talk) 21:13, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

You just shut up, he is trying to abuse the particular sub caste as much as possible. This is not the fighting place. You don't have place for moral values of communities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandit4580 (talk • contribs)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for failure to abide by (or even try to understand) Wikipedia policies such as WP:V and general incompetence.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. utcursch &#124; talk 21:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)