User talk:Panghea

Nomination of Christian Rosa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian Rosa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Christian Rosa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 16:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear Wikocology, please state why there is no evidence of notability for this contemporary artist when he is being noted by different world renowned newspaper,magazines, museums, foundations, galleries and curators- in fact the leaders of the art industry - for the importance and outstanding position of his work. Please find a few samples of above mentioned outlet recognizing his work: 1. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/12/arts/international/galleries-try-to-find-their-niche.html?_r=0 2.http://www.welt.de/kultur/kunst-und-architektur/article136996297/Rosa-ist-gross-unerwachsen-und-transformierwillig.html 3.https://news.artnet.com/art-world/catch-up-with-rising-star-christian-rosa-17566 4.http://www.complex.com/style/2014/01/artists-to-watch-2014/christian-rosa 5.http://whitecube.com/artists/christian_rosa/ 6.https://www.nowness.com/story/christian-rosa 7.https://paddle8.com/editorial/8-things-to-know-about-painter-christian-rosa/

Further two publications of Christian Rosa were published so far over Snoeck Publishing in 2015: 1.http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Rosa-Love-Coco/dp/3864421233 2.http://www.amazon.com/Christian-Rosa-Loves-Gonna-Save/dp/3864420857/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1452189427&sr=1-1

With best regards, P Panghea (talk) 18:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2017
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 09:44, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

non authorized IP range
What does that mean? -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 16:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Panghea. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Christian Rosa ‎, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 16:54, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Also, please see Biographies of living persons/Help. If problems persist, please report them at WP:BLPN -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 17:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. --- Possibly &#9742; 17:40, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:11, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:18, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Indefinite partial block from Christian Rosa
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for violations to the conflict of interest guideline (conflict of interest disclosure requests above left unreplied). Note that you still retain the ability to use the article talk page (Talk:Christian Rosa), which thus far has seen zero comments, from anyone. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 13:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)