User talk:Panickar

=May 2020= Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Capitalism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 05:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank You
Hi, Thank you for adding me to this ! Panickar (talk) 06:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Capitalism - Where the Rubber hits the Road.
Many different explanations, theories define Capitalism and are often taught. Most, if not all use economic terms, jargon that common person may not relate to. Economies touch everyone living on this planet even the uneducated, so it is necessary to entail the characteristics that relate to everyone.

In this regard, one undisputed characteristic of capitalism is the flow of capita. i.e. it's accumulation and dispersal cycle. Most available text and definitions are soft on the real economic flow.

This discussion for the real characteristics of Capitalism as perceived by the average person on the street. Capitalism as perceived and experienced daily through the eyes of the common man, rather than as defined by Economic Theory. Panickar (talk) 06:31, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

The addition is completely neutral. Can you pls explain and point out precisely how it is biased and towards whom/what.

Also it is in formal tone. Kindly point out where and how tone is inappropriate or abusive.

Also can you point out precisely what wrong is present in the addition.

Infact, upon subjective opinion this was suppressed Panickar (talk) 10:52, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but that flips the burden of proof in an impermissible manner. You need to find sources, if you are to readd it. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 11:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

You are unable to point a single word that is biased, inappropriate etc and then ... The burden of proof lies on the person making the allegations. That is basic jurisprudence. There is just a subjective statement "that flips burden of proof in an impermissible manner". No offence meant to anyone, but, I guess, from here on it is your established power as editor to reverse, rather than reliance on well settled common knowledge and perception. This will end up requiring to prove basic well settled and commonly accepted facts like '2+2 = 4'

In any case, below I am providing some links on Capitalism and the role of Banks in providing money to fuel capital accumulation.

1. Financial Times Article https://www.marxists.org/archive/hilferding/1910/finkap/ch14.htm

2. NY Times public banks essential to capitalism https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/10/01/should-states-operate-public-banks/public-banks-are-essential-to-capitalism