User talk:Panini!

 Oooh, secret! 🥪

Question from Brianbladewilson on American Me (band) (18:10, 13 April 2024)
Hello, I was editing the “current members” section and something went wrong in the coding/format. I think it’s something small I’m missing. Please help? Thanks --Brianbladewilson (talk) 18:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there @Brianbladewilson! I've reverted your edit to see what the problem was (make sure if you accidentally break something you revert the edit to not leave it broken), and it seems like all that was missing was two curly brackets }} at the end of the box.
 * If you look into the code you'll see this table on the side reads "{{Infobox musical artist" at the top. This template specifically is used to give specific info about the artist. All templates are defined by two curly brackets on either side; they'll display anything that is on that page inside of the page you use the template on. By using {{Infobox music artist}}, it will display everything on the Template:Infobox musical artist article (except the instructions). This works for every non mainspace article.
 * Panini! • 🥪 19:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Question from Zozopelli (12:39, 18 April 2024)
https://coronadoconcert.com/our-beloved-bandstand/

I would like to preserve Coronado, California history... A music teacher sold his car to create an on-going community concert lasting over 50 years.

Don't want to re create the wheel or just the current website... Best way to ingest stories, images, videos.

Thanks in advance... Best zozo --Zozopelli (talk) 12:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there @Zozopelli! This is an interesting read.
 * Although it is interesting information, it seems to be too outside of the Scope of the article about Coronado, California. This article is about the city itself, and details about the history of concert within it are too specific for an article of its size.
 * Perhaps you can find another more specific article where this information can be used, or even creating an article about the location itself? Panini!  • 🥪 22:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Question from Beachweak (22:05, 21 April 2024)
Hello! I'm new to editing Wikipedia. There are various pages on the Aphex Twin discography (such as Joyrex J4 EP & Joyrex J5 EP) that have limited sources. I wanted to add sources from something like Discogs to show the appearance and / or track listings of the EPs are accurate, but I've read Wikipedia disallows Discogs as a source. What should I do? Thank you. --Beachweak (talk) 22:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there, @Beachweak! Can you let me know what exact information you are trying to source in these lists? That will help with my answer.
 * If you are just trying to source the songs on the track lists such as the one on Analogue Bubblebath, you technically don't need to. The object of discussion is usually the source itself (such as how we don't source plot sections per WP:PLOTCITE), so this does not need to be verified, per se. Information that needs verification to be true, such as writer credits and release dates, require sources however. Let me know what it is you want to source and I can help you out from there! Panini!  • 🥪 20:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi! After I did some more reading on Wikipedia sources and verification and such, I realised the verification was needed for other claims in the article and not the track listing. However, on a semi-related note, would Discogs be able to be cited if I couldn't find information on a topic anywhere else? I'm currently drafting an article on an EP, Draft:London 19.08.2023, and some of the information (mainly the price and stock numbers of the record) can only be found on this Discogs page. I plan to eventually write other articles on related Aphex Twin EPs and it would be helpful to know in case I make a mistake. Thank you! Beachweak (talk) 21:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @Beachweak, So I'm having trouble finding where exactly it says this right now, but price and stock numbers are not usually mentioned in our articles because they don't serve much encyclopedic value. In some cases where the price itself is of note (such as people widely complaining about the price of something) we include it, but this rule is in place to keep it neutral and free of promotional info (see WP:NOTAD). As such, don't worry about it! Panini!  • 🥪 03:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @Beachweak, found it (I say I found it but they did, the rule is WP:NOTPRICE. Panini!  • 🥪 02:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Growth News, April 2024


The Growth team will now send quarterly reports to keep you in the loop. Growth team weekly updates are available on wiki (in English) if you want to know more about our day-to-day work.

If you want to receive more general updates about technical activity happening across the Wikimedia movement (including Growth work), we encourage you to subscribe to Tech News.

Community Configuration
Growth features are currently configurable at. This quarter we are working on making Community Configuration accessible for other MediaWiki developers while also moving Growth feature configuration to the new CommunityConfiguration extension.

An early version of Community Configuration can be tested at Spanish Beta Wikipedia. We plan to release the new Community Configuration extension to pilot wikis (Arabic and Spanish Wikipedia) in early May, 2024. The first non-Growth team feature to utilize Community Configuration will be Automoderator.

In parallel with the development, the Growth team will propose Community Configuration usage guidelines, Community Configuration design guidelines, and provide technical documentation.

Experiment Results
Add a Image experiment analysis results

The Growth team conducted an experiment to assess the impact of the “Add an Image” structured task on the Newcomer Homepage's "Suggested Edits" module. This analysis finds that the Add an Image structured task leads to an increase in newcomer participation on the mobile web platform, particularly by making constructive (non-reverted) article edits:


 * The likelihood that mobile web newcomers make their first article edit (+17.0% over baseline)
 * The likelihood that they are retained as newcomers (+24.3% over baseline)
 * The number of edits they make during their first two weeks on the wiki (+21.8% over baseline)
 * A lower probability of the newcomers' edits will be reverted (-3.3% over baseline).

Personalized praise experiment results

This feature was developed for Mentors as part of the Growth team's Positive Reinforcement project. When A/B testing on Spanish Wikipedia, we found no significant impact on retention, but we found a significant positive impact on newcomer productivity. However, we concluded that the results weren’t positive enough to justify the time investment from Mentors. We plan to discuss this feature with our pilot wikis, and consider further improvements before scaling this feature further. Meanwhile, communities willing to test the feature can ask to have it deployed. (T361763)

English donors encouraged to try editing

As in previous years, donors were directed to a Thank you page after donation (example). However, this year we tested a new “Try editing Wikipedia,” call to action on the Thank You page. This call to action linked to a unique account creation page. From this account creation page we were able to track Registrations and Activation (editing for the first time). During the English banner campaign, the Donor Thank you page led to 4,398 new accounts, and 441 of those accounts went on to constructively edit within 24 hours. (T352900)

Future work
Annual Plan

The Growth team and the Editing team will work on the WE1.2 Key Result in the coming fiscal year. We will start initial discussions with communities soon to help finalize our plans. (T361657)

Newcomer Homepage Community Updates module

We plan to A/B test adding a new Community Configurable module to the Newcomer Homepage that will allow communities to highlight specific events, projects, campaigns, and initiatives. We are early in the planning phase of this project that will take place first at our pilot wikis and wikis volunteering. We welcome community feedback on initial designs and plans, in any language at our project talk page.

'' Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. '' 18:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Question from Beachweak (22:40, 25 April 2024)
Hi there! I've been doing some reviews of the pages Money Money 2020, Trans Am (EP) and Money Money 2020 Part II: We Told Ya So!. In the "chronology" section for each release, it seems to differ slightly; in the first, Trans Am (EP) isn't mentioned anywhere and the page contains a blank "singles" category in the infobox. In the second, Trans Am (EP) is inserted into the chronology. In the third, it's not present in the chronology, but is present in the "singles" section. How do you think the EP should be displayed? I couldn't find any pages on how the chronology section works but I feel like the EP should be mentioned somewhere in their chronology. Thank you! --Beachweak (talk) 22:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey @Beachweak, sorry for the late reply, but here I am finally.
 * The blank singles was because it was never technically filled out. The "name" header was to cite the name of the album, and a "single1" parameter needed to be used (see the difference in my edits for clarification). Why it doesn't just assume the name of the album I don't know.
 * For the chronology I'm not sure why Trans Am (EP) wasn't mentioned but I added it to the chronology. Now I'm not too sure why that is or if there's a specific rule for this one as well, but for all the music works I've done so far I skip over those EPs if there isn't an article for it. If there is, go for it!
 * Panini! • 🥪 03:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
 * with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
 * with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
 * with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
 * with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
 * with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Question from UnlockSalmon on User:UnlockSalmon/sandbox (15:35, 29 April 2024)
How do sent draft for review? --UnlockSalmon (talk) 15:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there @UnlockSalmon! After looking at your draft you seem to have submitted it correctly already. Good work!
 * All there is left to do is wait. Wikipedia has a large backlog of pending articles at any given time, so it is likely to take a while before the article is reviews. In the meantime you can work on other articles, or polish the draft. I would recommend writing a lead section for your article (see here), and translating your article's references into English (see WP:RSUE). Perhaps there is an image of traditional clothing in Thailand that you can find on Wikimedia Commons as well? Panini!  • 🥪 16:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Question from Heathledford79 on User talk:Heathledford79 (11:20, 6 May 2024)
Hello I just found that this is a talk page and I was wondering is there a certain kind of questions I should ask --Heathledford79 (talk) 11:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey @Heathledford79! I'm here as your mentor to help answer any questions you may have about editing Wikipedia. Whether that be technical help, sourcing issues, or simple advice on how to word something, you can hit me up here and I'll get back to you as soon as I can (about ~1 day).
 * I was a new editor too once. There is no wrong answer you can ask! Granted, questions like these are... I guess not easy for me to answer all too well, but don't be afraid to reach out. Panini!  • 🥪 13:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Shamshelly (06:58, 9 May 2024)
Naupenda ufundi wa pikpik sana --Shamshelly (talk) 06:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Shamshelly,  Panini!  • 🥪 13:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * asante sana nimekalibiya na nime waelewa vema Shamshelly (talk) 09:52, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

TFA
Today's TFA, Felix M. Warburg House, was written by Vami_IV and Epicgenius, introduced: "This article is about another of the great houses that once lined Fifth Avenue in New York. Specifically, this is the mansion of Felix M. Warburg, a Jewish financier who ignored fears of anti-Semitic reprisal to his decided to build himself a big Gothic manor in the middle of New York City. Although the Warburgs no longer remain, their legacy does: the museum is now the home of the Jewish Museum (Manhattan) and the building largely survives as they left it. It's a beautiful building and I hope you will all enjoy it."! - in memory -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Today's story mentions a concert I loved to hear and a piece I loved to sing in choir, 150 years old OTD. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:18, 22 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Out of curiosity @Gerda Arendt, why was their work banned by the Nazis? Was it because of its Austrian origin, or something else? Panini!  • 🥪 23:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Please read "Degenerate art", or their biographies. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing this one out to me @Gerda Arendt! I had been vaguely aware of book burning during this time period but this was a very interesting read. I really like the articles that are mostly historical reads.
 * Probably not the best idea to ask questions about this, then go on a cruise vacation for a week... sorry about the late response. As always, keep up the good work! Panini!  • 🥪 23:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Puzzleshaman (07:40, 11 May 2024)
HELLO I HJJAVE UPLOADED A PAGE REGARDING A COMIC BOOK BUT YET I AM NOT ABLE TO FIND IT --Puzzleshaman (talk) 07:40, 11 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, @Puzzleshaman! I apologize for the wait on my response. 6 days is really bad on my end...
 * Looking through your contributions and user page, it seems the page (which you have accidentally created on your user page instead of a draft), was speedy deleted per WP:NOTBLOG. This deletion was conducted by the user Fastily (great user), and since I have no access to the article they can give you a more detailed explanation if you politely reach out to them. I'm pretty sure you should also be able to retrieve the contents, as I assume that is where your panic comes from (be wary of all-caps, per WP:SHOUT).
 * I recommend you upload your article through our WP:Article Wizard in the future, where you can workshop your article in the background of Wikipedia until you're ready to officially submit it for review, where you can also receive further advice as you work on it. Panini!  • 🥪 22:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 52 (album series)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 52 (album series) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IanTEB -- IanTEB (talk) 16:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Hadich528 (05:07, 14 May 2024)
Hey there, I want to write an article with side image and the details, but it takes too much time to approve. --Hadich528 (talk) 05:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there @Hadich528! Unfortunately, long wait times for reviews on Wikipedia is fairly common. Wikipedia is run by regular ol' people like you and me, and reviews come out of a user's generosity. They are usually quite a time commitment to review as well. As such, it will take time, and the best thing you can do is wait. For example, drafts via the Article's for creation process can take up to three months! Panini!  • 🥪 22:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Signature poll
I kind of screwed up the votes by making changes to the options so now I truly understand why that is a big no-no in important RfC discussions, but I was able to set things right since the discussion was thankfully still early into it and I just wanted to let you know I think all has been set right if you had any concerns. Huggums537 Vote! (guest🖋️book) or (suggestion🗳️box)? 01:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Huggums537 In your case you should be fine. Rules for polling only really apply to discussions that will affect anything relating to Wikipedia content or Wikipedia itself. Your page is user-run and you can do whatever you want with it per user page rules. Panini!  • 🥪 18:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I thought as much. Thanks for the supporting sentiments. You can change your vote if you want. I really like the light blue you suggested so I changed my vote to undecided for now... Huggums537 Vote! (guest🖋️book) or (suggestion🗳️box)? 19:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Raman4610 (15:20, 23 May 2024)
How to create new article --Raman4610 (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there @Raman4610! You can create a new article through the WP:Article Wizard. It can be pretty difficult, so be sure to follow the instructions and presented information very carefully as you go along. I'm here to help you out with any questions, so if you get stuck or need help making something work, reach out to me here! Panini!  • 🥪 23:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Charon870 (02:46, 24 May 2024)
Hello, I am looking to add to an page of a ship that I work on. I Would like to add some pictures that the average public wouldn't normally get to see. but I'm not sure how to add images. --Charon870 (talk) 02:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Charon870 Hey there @Charon870! It seems like you have access to some useful imagery. To upload images under a free use license, the best and easiest way to do so is to upload them to Wikimedia Commons, Wikipedia's public domain library of images and videos. You'll see the big ol' upload button there. Make sure you're certain your images meets the criteria for being 100% free; be sure to click any links to guidelines along the way if you need help. Panini!  • 🥪 23:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from Poisoned Comics (16:59, 3 June 2024)
Hello, how do I create an article? --Poisoned Comics (talk) 16:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there @Poisoned Comics! Just as a heads-up, do not expect me to answer this fast in the future; you coincidentally caught me on my morning browse (although today's "morning" browse is very late as I had other things to do before this).
 * First check to see if your article meets our general notability guidelines. Give this linked list a look-over first, and I also recommend browsing the rest of it to see if there's other information relevant to the article you want to make. Then, you can use our WP:Article Wizard as an easy-to-use template to get you started. There will be a lot of relevant information as you go forward that will help ensure the process goes as smoothly as possible.
 * Creating an article is tricky, and requires some hard work; my first article barely made it through without the help of other veterans picking it up. But that's why I'm here! If you have any questions, please reach out to me the same way you did here. Panini!  • 🥪 17:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Nifemimustshine (22:17, 4 June 2024)
Hello --Nifemimustshine (talk) 22:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Nifemimustshine (22:18, 4 June 2024)
How can I write my own article as I'm biography --Nifemimustshine (talk) 22:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there @Nifemimustshine! Sorry for the late reply.
 * For instructions on how to create an article, see the information above that I gave to Poisoned Comics. I'm quite proud of the way I presented that information, and I'm a bit jealous that present day Panini can't think of anything better to say than 3 days ago Panini.
 * With regards to new advice, I strongly recommend you visit this advice page. Tread carefully, and ensure that your article is verifiable within our notability guidelines, and dictated from a WP:NPOV. Let me know if you have any further questions, or if you come across any trouble while editing. Panini!  • 🥪 01:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Weird messages due to Elliot Rodger article
Bro today I received such an odd message on my talkpage and saw it was a barnstar, but the message was really weird. People think his attacks were a "sacrifice" which is just disgusting to think about it. The internet is such a weird place. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey @Shoot for the Stars, sorry you have to put up with this. Difficult and controversial subjects can garner a lot of trolls and mobs into your corner (see unfortunately). The best advice I can give you is report them to ANI or a trusted administrator immediately, and do not, under any circumstances, feed the trolls. I highly recommend you also read this essay to prepare you for future encounters. Such article subjects are very involved with the internet and will therefore attract a lot of people to this site.
 * Also, I've reported this to (see talk), my trusted admin friend to get eyes on it because I've gotta run to work, but I'll follow up on my break.  Panini!  • 🥪 13:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * , update: they've been blocked, sockpuppetry. got to it (see here).  Panini!  • 🥪 01:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Update update: I talked with ferret about it a bit. It's just a general WP:LTA that's vandalizes randomly. She suggests going to ANI to report any future suspicious behavior. Panini!  • 🥪 02:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the late reply Panini!. I really appreciate the help and advice. I'll make sure to follow it the next time this happens. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 19:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Brownmen91 on Writing better articles (08:01, 17 June 2024)
How do I create an better version of my own website and then create an app for my website --Brownmen91 (talk) 08:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there @Brownmen91! This question does not seem best suited for Wikipedia, although we do have a Reference desk where you can ask general questions and get answers from editors. Panini!  • 🥪 02:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Pokemongounitefan (14:11, 24 June 2024)
Hi --Pokemongounitefan (talk) 14:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there @Pokemongounitefan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I gave you some starting info on your talk page to get you started. Panini!  • 🥪 16:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from HistoryRiderIndia (21:31, 25 June 2024)
I am creating a new page. The following is the link. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Thiruvancheri_kavu

There are issues in the format of pictures and I need guidance on the getting the page approved. --HistoryRiderIndia (talk) 21:31, 25 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there @HistoryRiderIndia! Welcome to Wikipedia. I have placed your images under a gallery command for you. As for getting the page approved, the best thing to do is wait; since these article drafts are reviewed by volunteer editors just like you, the process isn't formalized and it may take a while; it's estimated that article reviews take up to 3 months at the latest. Panini!  • 🥪 12:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks HistoryRiderIndia (talk) 07:58, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:


 * with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
 * with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
 * with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
 * with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from FilmmakingFanDude (23:27, 29 June 2024)
Working on getting a draft page approved, what would you think would need to be added to this page in general. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Miles_Morales_(Spider-Verse) --FilmmakingFanDude (talk) 23:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there @FilmmakingFanDude! This is a good question, and also a tough one. Your work here so far is pretty good for one, but the decline reason is a lack of reliable sourcing.
 * What I have seen time and time again with fictional character articles is that they are usually declined for a lack of significant coverage pertaining to the character, and the character alone. They're pretty tough to get published because they're put under very tough scrutiny by the community, as they usually look through the sources to see if the source actually discusses the character in any significance. This doesn't usually happen with other articles. Because they hate character articles. They're chracist. Chracism.
 * So make sure that the sources you use are in-depth and really relevant to the character. Does this source discuss the character's design and development with in-depth detail? Or the voice actor? Or their role in the films? What about critical discussion? This is just a hunch and I have not looked into it at all so don't take my word for gospel, but this just has to be a notable character. It just has to be! But that's about the best advice I can give since this stuff isn't really my domain. For more specific advice, I call on and, who are heavily involved in this line of work, and should be able to spot specifics better than I can. Any suggestions, you two?  Panini!  • 🥪 19:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Question from AsifibnShahNavas (09:48, 1 July 2024)
hello i want to contribute an Article how i can do that!! --AsifibnShahNavas (talk) 09:48, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there @AsifibnShahNavas! To create an article it would be best to follow through our WP:Article Wizard process. Make sure you click on relevant info links as you go and follow the steps carefully to ensure that pursuing your article is worthwhile. Panini!  • 🥪 19:45, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Question from Nickpetersen2023 (10:34, 3 July 2024)
I would like to add an article about the Bulgarian Top Level Domain register .bg. The organization that operates the national registry is called "Register.BG". I did create a draft page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nickpetersen2023/Register.BG Please help me how the page can be published. Thank you! Attempted to publish link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Register.BG --Nickpetersen2023 (talk) 10:34, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey @Nickpetersen2023, sorry for the late reply! It seems the article was unfortunately declined since, but it seems to bee just for reliability issues and the formatting looks perfect; as long as you can find more detailed documentation from reliable sources (see that link for what makes a source reliable), the article will definitely go up from there. Panini!  • 🥪 19:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Question from Mustafa Khan Dilzak (05:28, 5 July 2024)
How can I make my article --Mustafa Khan Dilzak (talk) 05:28, 5 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey @Mustafa Khan Dilzak! This may not be the answer you want to hear, but I strongly advise you do not. See here for why this is not such a good thing as it seems. Panini!  • 🥪 19:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

 * Thanks @Boneless Pizza! All these kind wishes help keep me motivated. By the way, what the heck is boba? What's in it, and what are those little balls at the bottom like? Panini!  • 🥪 18:59, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I had no idea what "tapioca balls" were either until I looked it up at google. lol 🍕  Boneless Pizza! 🍕 (🔔) 23:00, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Panini! It seems like you're good at writing. If only you have some time, could you perhaps review Ada Wong? (It is active at peer review). Many thanks! 🍕  Boneless Pizza! 🍕 (🔔) 12:35, 17 July 2024 (UTC)