User talk:PaniniGrammar

June 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Ayurveda. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Where my edits appear to be disruptive can you mention & elaborate... Meanwhile is IMA an NGO any certifying authority to certify Mellenia old Herbal Medical Science & founder of Surgery as an Quackery??

Also precursor is always a precursor & must be respected by all means... You can't just mark a Science as an Quackery when the World knows Benefits of Herbs example Turmeric, Basil, Clove, Cumin, Cardamom,Milk,Veggies,Pulses,etc,etc... PaniniGrammar (talk) 22:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Omnivore
Hi, I noticed your recent edits to this article. I'm sure they were well-meant, but they didn't improve the article's quality, so I've undone them. If you think there's something that needs fixing, please raise it on the article's talk page. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)