User talk:Panjikar

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 11:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Goud Saraswat Brahmin, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:13, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi jim ,I have read that source yesteraday.The user had copied line to line ditto from the authors book without any self editing.Hope you know the violation of rule in this case. Panjikar (talk) 07:20, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Daivadnya Brahmin
Hi, I have reverted your removals at Daivadnya Brahmin for various reasons. Some examples are:


 * You said that sources must be in English (not true)
 * You said that we must have evidence of caste self-identification for dead people (not true)
 * You claimed some stuff from a non-English source was a copy/paste but the statements in the article were written in English
 * You said that sources must be available digitally (not true)

There may have been some good work mixed among all those problems and more but, really, as a whole that series of edits around 10 July was very disruptive. I think you should review WP:RS and WP:COPYRIGHT in particular. - Sitush (talk) 14:59, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
&mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  03:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Daivadnya Brahmin again
Did you look at my edit summaries for the content that you have now restored to Daivadnya Brahmin? You have reinstated gibberish. - Sitush (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Look, I have explained this previously but it looks like you do not want to listen, hence you have added something else back again. Mentioning the gazette is just unnecessary, and citing a primary source in the way that you did to substantiate that they are one of the few OBC Brahmin communities is original research. You have been made aware of the sanctions regime that exists for articles such that Daivadnya Brahmin so I suggest that you self-revert before some administrator decides to impose a sanction on you. - Sitush (talk) 20:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to a community enforced topic ban
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:04, 4 October 2017 (UTC)