User talk:Pankaj.4u.4u

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Pankaj.4u.4u/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Pankaj.4u.4u/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Alexf(talk) 15:47, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:57, 29 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I'm not entirely sure about the username(if could clarify), but your edits were definitely promotional. If you are employed by the TV network you wrote about, you will need to review WP:COI and WP:PAID, and agree to not edit about it.  What contributions do you want to make if unblocked?  You don't need to provide any email to this account(though if you don't, you will be unable to recover a lost password). 331dot (talk) 19:17, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * 331dot, thanks for ping. Spam user names don't necessarily match the article title, but I have to admit that even I can't see why the name is problematic now. Happy to leave it in your capable hands, and the editor can't say he hasn't been warned about COI editing if you do unblock Jimfbleak - talk to me?  19:25, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Since Jimfbleak has clarified this situation and decided to leave it to me, I just need you to answer my questions above. 331dot (talk) 21:21, 30 November 2018 (UTC)