User talk:PankajGupta05

November 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Akira Miyawaki, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. ''The author of the reference you inserted appears to share the same name as you. Is this self-published?'' — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 15:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your valuable feedback. Regards PankajGupta05 (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi PankajGupta05! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Also, please refrain from using your own site as a source. — Tenryuu 🐲  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 21:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 14:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I wish to inform you that whatever information I am adding is not for any tags. It just that I am a regular visitor to Wikipedia, and I have learnt a lot from it. It is a sort of thank to Wikipedia. I have no intention of spamming but nonetheless I write only authentic content on my website too and try to keep 100% accuracy. Thus, in turn you won't find any of my information incorrect from my end. Therefore, my links are not inappropriate at all. They are like other references present on your pages. But if it is against your policy then I won't make any correction at all. But in this case Wikipedia will miss out some important information. PankajGupta05 (talk) 14:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I have no intention of spamming but nonetheless I write only authentic content on my website too and try to keep 100% accuracy. Still against policy, if we're going by your disclaimer on said site: Emphasis added.Emphasis added.Emphasis added. See WP:BLOGS.But in this case Wikipedia will miss out some important information. Maybe, but unless it can be verified by a source the encyclopedia considers reliable, that's no skin off its back. — Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 15:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)