User talk:Pankajtripathi

A tag has been placed on PANKAJ TRIPATHI, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 14:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please also see Wikipedia's policies on conflict of interest and autobiographies (and why these are usually a bad idea). Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 14:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Gscshoyru 14:34, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

PANKAJ TRIPATHI
The article you created at PANKAJ TRIPATHI was eligible for deletion without further discussion under criterion 7 in the criteria for speedy deletion, Articles section, as an article about a real person that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. Since it appears to be about you I've moved it to your user space instead, which was probably what you intended in the first place (a common mistake among newcomers!).

If you really did mean to create an article about yourself please be aware that this is often considered a bad idea, even if you do meet the guidelines for inclusion of biographies.

I know Wikipedia can be confusing for new editors, so you are welcome to ask for help at the help desk or on my talk page._Wafulz 15:58, 26 July 2007 (UTC)