User talk:Panteracaparbia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cloudpipes (January 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraxmoira was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cloudpipes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Cloudpipes Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jeraxmoira&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cloudpipes reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Jeraxmoira
 * first of all thank you so much for reviewing the article so quickly and for your valuable feedback.
 * I would like to say that Cloudpipes press covering has been very low due to the maturity of the company and thus it might be tricky to find even more relevant references. A key point that I would like to highlight is the critical role Cloudpipes product is playing for Quickbase, who has successfully integrated Cloudpipes into the original product, as to enable workflow automation with many web-based applications. value. I think it would be nice for Cloudpipes not to be forgotten, when played a critical role in the iPaaS industry :-)
 * So far I found the additional articles, would any of them be suitable?
 * https://www.quickbase.com/blog/introducing-the-strategic-enterprise-platform-for-acquainted
 * [Https://form.digitalisationworld.com/news/51069/masergy-partners-with-cloudpipes https://form.digitalisationworld.com/news/51069/masergy-partners-with-cloudpipes]
 * [Https://www.trendingtopics.eu/bulgaria-uk-based-cloudpipes-gets-acquired-by-vista-backed-quick-base/ https://www.trendingtopics.eu/bulgaria-uk-based-cloudpipes-gets-acquired-by-vista-backed-quick-base/]
 * [Https://www.marketscreener.com/news/latest/Masergy-Partners-With-Cloudpipes-to-Make-Communications-Enabled-Business-Workflows-as-Easy-as-Assemb-24108027/ https://www.marketscreener.com/news/latest/Masergy-Partners-With-Cloudpipes-to-Make-Communications-Enabled-Business-Workflows-as-Easy-as-Assemb-24108027/]
 * [Https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1215147/cloudpipes-for-jira?tab=overview&hosting=cloud https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1215147/cloudpipes-for-jira?tab=overview&hosting=cloud]
 * [Https://cloudpipes.readthedocs.io/ https://cloudpipes.readthedocs.io/]
 * Many thanks for your help
 * Panteracaparbia Panteracaparbia (talk) 12:04, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Panteracaparbia. I'm sorry, but as you mentioned, if the press coverage is low, then it will be difficult to establish notability. According to WP:INHERITORG, notability is not inherited, so Quickbase holds no value here.
 * From a glance, these sources will not be enough.
 * Source 1 is a blog and is not an independent source, as it has been posted by QuickBase.
 * Source 2 reads like a press release, see WP:ORGTRIV.
 * Source 3 does not seem reliable (though I may be wrong).
 * Source 4 is the same as Source 2, WP:ORGTRIV.
 * Source 5 is a directory listing.
 * Source 6 is the documentation for Cloudpipes and is considered a primary source.
 * You can review the guidelines for organization notability here: Notability (organizations and companies). Also, if you have any affiliation with Cloudpipes then you need to disclose your COI. Please see WP:COI. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Jeraxmoira
 * Thanks again your feedback and guidance, they are really useful.
 * I will keep looking based on that. Just one further question, in order to be acceptable, how many "notable" references are required for an article to be approved?
 * Many thanks
 * Panteracaparbia Panteracaparbia (talk) 11:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Panteracaparbia: Please check WP:THREE. You would require at least 3 - 5 reliable and independent sources with significant coverage. Preferably from major/reliable news media outlets. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you :-) Panteracaparbia (talk) 11:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Jeraxmoira
 * out of curiosity would this article from an independent source be fine?
 * https://www.capital.bg/biznes/kompanii/2019/08/15/3951516_amerikanskata_quick_base_kupi_suzdadenata_ot_bulgari/
 * Many thanks Panteracaparbia (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I am not able to view it. It requires a subscription. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cloudpipes


Hello, Panteracaparbia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cloudpipes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  23:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC)