User talk:Pantheera.eesh

September 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dany Verissimo. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''You have provided a lot more detail to the article, much of which is useful. However, you have insisted on making three fundamental flaws. You are removing established and accurate content, such as infoboxes. You insist on making formatting errors like using external links instead of refs and other typographical inconsistencies. Your writing seems like it was machine-translated or else your English is just not good enough for an encyclopedia.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please take the time to review Wikipedia's policies and perhaps approach your edits in a more piecemeal manner.'' JesseRafe (talk) 19:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dany Verissimo. Assumption of good faith is gone now. JesseRafe (talk) 19:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

—Pantheera.eesh (talk)
 * Regarding this edit: if there is copyright infringement, can you be specific about which passages of text are infringing? I need to know so that they can be properly rolled back. —C.Fred (talk) 19:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Dear C.Fred talk : picture posted by ??? and reposted by JesseRafe is a copyright infringement and is the property of website Explicite. We uploaded a picture you can use on Wikimedia. Dates and biography elements are not correct. Rules say : "Material about living persons should not be added when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism" which is the case in the version JesseRafe insist to keep. For a better english, I'm going to check with someone in our office to have a better translation. If we don't come to agreement, or if you don't like the next version with a better english, then delete the page. Feel free to contact our jurist at our agency (contact is on the imdbpro page). Thank you for understanding. Cheers from Paris.
 * The picture being used is one with a release on file at Commons. Such a release cannot be subsequently revoked.
 * By the way, what do you mean by "our office"? It sounds like you have a conflict of interest and need to make a paid editor disclosure. —C.Fred (talk) 23:07, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Pantheera.eesh (talk) 23:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I track fake informations C.Fred :) Huge fan of Wikipedia and Dany Verissimo. No COI here. Sad to see incorrect informations (I notice edits from contributors trying to promote their projects using her name. You can verify my recent corrections on Imdb. Willing to help. No money to afford a paid editor : can you help? Unfortunately the image you mention is a copyright infringement: the person who uploaded this image wasn't honest with you. It's copyrighted Explicite/JBR on their website. You can verify the info, not lying to you.
 * I don't need to verify the info. Commons OTRS already has. They've already confirmed the person they spoke to has authority to release the image. You've just stated that you have no connection to the subject and no standing to comment on the matter. —C.Fred (talk) 23:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Pantheera.eesh (talk) 23:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Pantheera.eesh (talk) 00:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I do C.Fred. Thanks for the information, I can forward it and inform John B.Root about the violation and someone giving the permission to use it on his behalf. Nor mine (images are protected under a contract signed between us. Read the bio again). As for my connection, now you understand it a little bit more... I'm Dany Verissimo-Petit. Using Pantheera.eesh profile while she's next to me (yes, I'm friends with some of my fans. People following me on Facebook know that). I needed to see how verifiable are your sources and if it was that easy to correct wrong informations on Wikipedia. "If you find some incorrect information, there are a few things you can do. First, you can fix it yourself!”… Yes, you're right! Thanks for the teaching. Best, Dvp
 * So. Alternately you've said that you work in the office, you're not connected, and that you're the subject. That is a violation of policy for having multiple people using an account. And since you've indicated you're the subject, I'm inclined to block this account to protect the article in question until we can verify the identity of this editor. It might be the subject, or it might be a hoaxer—there's no way to tell unless you email the Volunteer Response Team here. —C.Fred (talk) 00:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I tweeted about it instead. It was a real interesting experience (I didn't know I was married twice, nor that I appeared in a film never made...) If it makes you happy, I'm going to email your team (should I join a picture in front the computer too?). I like to punk people. Especially when it involves me directly (like you said "I'm the subject"). Should I feel ashamed to correct fake infos about me? Not at all. Nobody should. It's my life. So, no regret. Not at all C.Fred. It's 2:25AM here in Paris. Got work to do tomorrow. xoxo, Dvp


 * Thank you for confirming that this account has been shared. —C.Fred (talk) 00:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sharing an account. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —C.Fred (talk) 00:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)