User talk:Pantsaklan

{{block|I humble ask to be unblocked because I haven't use my second account since my last block ! Also, an other guy had unblocked me for that, so I don't even know why I have been blocked.

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of Victorious episodes, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Don't use wikias as references, they are edited by anonymous people so info there is not reliable. See where they got their info and use that as a reference, not the wikia itself.'' Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:52, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of iCarly episodes. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kevinbrogers (talk) 07:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Ben 10: Omniverse


The article List of Ben 10: Omniverse has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. The pilot hasn't been produced yet. It's not clear there will be any episodes to list.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pontificalibus (talk) 08:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Ben 10: Omniverse for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Ben 10: Omniverse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Ben 10: Omniverse until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 09:10, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Ben 10 omniverse temp.png"
A page you created, Ben 10 omniverse temp.png, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Canuck My page89 (talk), 09:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

iCarly (season 6)
Thank you for contributing to this article. Unfortunately, the plot summary you added has had to be removed, as it appears to have been copied from elsewhere on the internet. While you are welcome to describe television shows in your own words, are viewing them, you cannot copy descriptions from other sources, even official ones. Please see Copy-paste. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:16, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Your addition to List of Victorious episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''You were notified about this previously on another of your sock accounts - User talk:Ptsaklan. As stated there: "Quotes are by default copyrighted. For fair use also need a valid reason to have them - there is none here." Nothing has changed since then.'' Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:46, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. When you recently edited ICarly (season 6), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dan Schneider (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012 (2)
Your addition to iCarly (season 6) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Kevinbrogers (talk) 17:12, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nyttend (talk) 18:21, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of multiple accounts, including using one account to evade a block on another account. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

You are now blocked indefinitely for attempting to dodge your original block - you need to address that if you'd like to be unblocked. → B  music  ian  12:01, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

To answer a couple of questions... -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Why wasn't that other person blocked? I don't know. They might have written the plot summary in their own words rather than by a straight copy. Or they might indeed have breached copyright by copying it and it wasn't noticed. In any case, people don't get blocked for a single copyright violation - they get blocked for doing it repeatedly after warnings. But this is all irrelevant - to get yourself unblocked you need to address your own behaviour, not that of other people.
 * Why was your block increased to indefinite? That has been explained to you in the above message that says "You are now blocked indefinitely for attempting to dodge your original block". Your block was escalated because you used an alternative account to carry on editing while you were blocked - it is you the person who is blocked, and you must not use other accounts to evade your block.

Please stop posting these unblock requests at the top of the page - talk pages work with the newest posts at the bottom. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:49, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

You have an unblocked account
From your unblock requests I assume you didn't realise that your account Pantsaklanos was only temporarily blocked, and its block ran out over three weeks ago. You are perfectly free to edit with that account. If there is some reason why it would be better to use this account, please let us know, and we can consider whether to block that one and unblock this one, but if there is no special reason then I suggest you just go ahead with using the other account. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)