User talk:Panyd/Archive 2

Request
Hi Panyd and thanks for the welcome. I wonder if you could help me edit "Bosworth (UK Parliament constituency)" so that it lists Michael Brooks as a representative of the Science Party rather than Independent? I tried but this caused problems with links in the box structure. Many thanks in advance. jjj4444 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjj4444 (talk • contribs) 22:15, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm really sorry but that is way beyond my area of expertise. You'll need to find someone who can code templates, and who would be willing to do it for a party with only one candidate. I can't make any promises but your best bet is to go to WikiProject Templates and ask someone there if they'd be willing to do it.
 * However, great first article. And if you need help with anything else I promise I'll do my best to assist you. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:10, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Apologies
Hi Panyd, I apologize for any inconvenience/frustration the checkuser caused. I'm glad I was mistaken. Best, Keepscases (talk) 21:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

OTRS
For some background, see this project page and the earlier SPI cases archived and referenced there. It is not clear why the OTRS ticket was created, other than possibly to give some credibility to the Wikipedia contributions. --Orlady (talk) 21:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC) Also this talk page section. --Orlady (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Nice diff
Congratulations! SlimVirgin TALK  contribs 18:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - that's no easy feat.--otherlleft 18:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Treat yourself to something awesome with all the money you save. Keepscases (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you guys so much! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 01:56, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Editor Review
Hi Panyd, I unfortunately missed the chance to comment on your recent editor review, but I just wanted to pop by and say I think you're doing great. Keep it up. Kindest regards, SpitfireTally-ho! 20:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Consciousness Quotient
Page restored. Note, however that it may well be deleted for other reasons in the near future, frankly this is one of those cases where the copyright owner shouldn't have bothered with OTRS. DES (talk) 23:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

OTRS wiki
Hello. You have a message on the OTRS wiki.--Rockfang (talk) 15:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Ben Mercer recreation
Hi there. The article above, deleted per AfD, has been recreated by the original author; I thought I'd let you know as you participated in the original AfD that I've relisted it here per the WP:RPDA policy. Cheers, Doonhamer (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Fyi, it doesnt appear that is a policy yet.--Rockfang (talk) 19:14, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Omantel
Hi Panyd,

I am sorry if I showed any kind of advertising of conflict of interest.

However, since Wikipedia articles should be written from a natural point then I would like to encourage responsible people at Wikipedia to have updated and correct information about the company on Wikipedia.

I’m a big fan of Wikipedia and I just wanted to update and have something reliable about my company on Wikipedia.

Anyhow, you can log in to our website and validate the information I am adding in Wikipedia and you feel that that it will be a conflict of interest if I am updating. Then, I will be more than happy if you can assign someone else to review our website and update accordingly!

One final comment, the section of Omantel service is totally not true! Expect for the previous CEO resignation and in fact he got another important post on the government.

I am not a expert but I am just person who wants to have a proper information about his company on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omantel om (talk • contribs) 15:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I've removed the information on the service, it was unsourced and it was highly opinionated, definitely not WP:NPOV! However, I would encourage you to not edit the article any further. If you think larger changes should be made to the article why not suggest them on the article's talk page?. That way other editors can decide whether they represent a conflict of interest and add information in such a way as is most beneficial for the encyclopedia. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 03:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

inre: Articles for deletion/Sonicsgate
Significant coverage of the film has been found, and the article expanded and sourced accordingly. Please check to see that they are not the brief mentions you might have found yourself. Regards,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 12:20, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Gerald J Tate
Replied on my talk. Olaf Davis (talk) 17:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Alpha State
Does the OTRS ticket contain only the licensing issue? I ask because, as I commented to the creator when I deleted the article, it also could qualify under criterion A7, a non-notable website. If you need me to restore the article so you can see what the text is, I'll go ahead and do that. —C.Fred (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It only concerns the licensing issue. Usually in these cases the article is restored and then deleted again under another criteria. However, I think restoring the article gives the community (not just the article's creator) the opportunity to try and improve it before it's deleted. I can warn the article's creator in my reply that it will probably be deleted under A7 and advise them on how they can improve this, but I can't say no to restoring it via OTRS. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:47, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It's restored, although the rationale for OTRS did not pick up in the log. However, I noted it in my next edit, which was to tag it db-a3. —C.Fred (talk) 18:49, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Edwardd Norton
Actually, the image you put in the infobox was File:Edward Norton.PNG, which was taken at a premiere of The Illusionist, which was a 2006 film, and was dated from February 2007, and the one I put back in was from the opening of the Metropolitan Opera in 2009 and was dated September 2009. Wildhartlivie (talk) 17:14, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

NYC Wikipedia Meetup Sunday, March 21
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Day NYC, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Lights Camera Wiki, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example User:ScienceApologist will present on "climate change, alternative medicine, UFOs and Transcendental Meditation" (see the November meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back. And if the weather is good, we'll have a star party with the telescopes on the roof of Pupin Hall!

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up
I appreciate the warning, and I'm glad that Lynn discovered the proper forums to complain in. I will do my best to be nice, but I will not stop defending the pages I watch, and I will not stop responding to people that make either unfounded, or purely wrong/ideological, claims about pages that numerous people have worked to get right. I employ tit for tat strategy in dealing with people on Wikipedia, and that isn't going to stop. However, I do appreciate you trying to be a mediator of sorts. Wikipedia needs more people in thankless jobs like that. (I tried being a mediator one time on Barney Frank's talk page...ugh.) J  DIGGITY  (U ¢ ME)  23:46, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Fleinsopp Tales
Hello Panyd. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fleinsopp Tales, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 doesn't apply to books. Thank you. Ged UK  18:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

B'tselem OTRS
Hi, what was the text of the email? Did it indicate that it was allowing a range of images or just specifically these 3? Unomi (talk) 19:33, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Just specifically those 3. The ticket is linked on the image pages if you can view it! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, doesn't look as though I can, it is asking for my nonexistent OTRS login. No worries and thanks again. Unomi (talk) 19:45, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

talkback
-- SKATER  Speak. 16:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello me
Please don't break pages. Thank youPanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Cyber-Ark
Since you argued to keep it, could you please help clean it up? -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. I'll give it a crack this weekend. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:36, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, so I spent a few hours looking through the 300+ sources which I found for the company. I have a problem though in that I understand nothing. They're talking about networks and how they can be improved and what the technical aspects of this are and how wonderful and innovative the company's software is. The problem is, I have no idea what any of this means so I can't write it into an article. The only things I really understand are: This is the company's founder, this is the deals they've made, these are the millions of surveys they've taken of industry standards. I don't think most of that is appropriate in the article, so I'm not comfortable re-writing it to just include that. I'm really sorry. But I hope I've cleaned it up a lot! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:19, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Valley Entertainment Monthly
Panyd, I've added the requisite sources to the article. There are at least three mentions of VEM in these print articles. Please review to see what you think. Thanks. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares
 * Hey there. I've looked at the article and the sources you've currently provided and unfortunately it's not enough to sway me at the moment. Having said that, I see that you have a lot of sources which are offline which mention the magazine. When I suggested that you go look at WP:CIT I was suggesting that you use one of the templates available there with quotations so that other people can see what the offline source is saying. If you'd like an example of this, take a look at the Fort Harrison Hotel article. You'll see that you can't access the database I've linked to for the sources, but there are quotes there so you can see where I've gotten the information from. If you do this to the offline sources in the article, it might give your argument more weight.
 * Like I said in the AfD, if it gets userfied I'd be happy to check up on it as you work and let you know how to improve it. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:30, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ty has been helping me to get a lot of this stuff presented the right way. I have to go out today but I will update it as you say when I get back later tonight. Thanks for your response! Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 18:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares

DYK for Lisa McPherson Trust
-- Cirt (talk) 16:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Congrats!! -- Cirt (talk) 16:05, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:08, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

I apologize for not getting back to you sooner
Hello Panyd:

On the Christ myth theory (CMT) talk page, you said:


 * Yes, if you search for "Christ Myth" it comes up with 154 for me, whereas if you search for Christ myth it comes up with 24,152 results. I found that searching for Christ myth actually came up with a lot more results which covered the topic of the historicity of Jesus (although that was by no means the central focus of the articles, it was still a topic of debate).


 * Bill, surely if this is a minority viewpoint, we're not going to be able to come up with a list as extensive as that in FAQ 2? Otherwise it would be the majority viewpoint, and we wouldn't be having this discussion in the first place.

I'm not sure why I missed your comment, but I don't want you to think I was ignoring you. At any rate, the CMT is not simply a minority viewpoint. It is almost universally rejected by almost ALL scholars (i.e., reliable sources). That should say quite a lot about the validity of the CMT.

I also want you to understand that accepting that Jesus was a historical personality does NOT mean that his claims (as detailed in the gospels and the NT in general) are true. We are only talking about whether a person who lived in Palestine in the first century, who (it is claimed) did this, that, or the other thing (whether major and/or minor). Therefore, if a significant list can't be assembled by those who oppose the historicity of Jesus, then that should count for something. Do you agree? (Please answer on your talk page; because I'm temporarily watching it.) Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 00:25, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I have to say I stepped away from the discussion because I came into it with one view and came away being very confused about the whole thing. There do seem to be some modern scholars, who specialise in the field of history, who do not accept the idea of a historical Christ. I mentioned a few in my original post on that thread, and after looking over the JSTOR results (for Christ myth not "Christ myth", just so we're perfectly clear there) for a few hours I think there are a few more hiding out there.


 * The term pseudo-history just doesn't seem appropriate. I completely agree that the fact that a list cannot be created which will be as thorough as that in FAQ 2 counts for something. At this point in time I think it points to the fact that it is a viewpoint held by a very small minority of scholars and I should hope that no one is denying that. But the word pseudo is usually attached to theories which have all but stepped away from reality entirely. These people appear to have well-reasoned, if flawed, arguments to back up their case, and although they may deny the...


 * You know what. I'll stop right there. because otherwise you'll be able to see my entirely convoluted thought process about the whole thing. I have to say that if I was the 'grand-king-emperor-decider' of this whole thing and I was looking at who had the better arguments, I'd say put it in pseudo-history. But there's just something so decidedly NPOV about the term itself that seems to be labelling these perfectly rational, if incorrect, individuals as quacks of some sort and I just can't justify doing that to the article. Unfortunately I also can't come up with any better argument to support my position without becoming some sort of historical scholar (definitely not my field of expertise).


 * Does that make sense? Am I being utterly unreasonable here? Should I change my vote to neutral? I think I probably should. Thanks for getting back to me. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 01:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

NYC Wikipedia Meetup Saturday, May 22
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikimedia Chapters Meeting 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wiki-Conference NYC and Wikipedia Cultural Embassy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:14, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia's tagline
Hi. I noticed that you participated in a recent discussion on whether or not the tagline at the top of all Wikipedia articles should be changed. I don't know if you're still interested in this issue or not, but this exact change has been proposed once again, this time at the Village pump, and there is currently an RFC (Request for Comment) on the subject where it is being discussed. All Hallow&#39;s Wraith (talk) 18:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Admin coaching
Hi Panyd,

I've recently returned from a fairly lengthy wikibreak, and while I am refreshed and once again in the mood to edit, I'm afraid I just don't have the enthusiasm or patience left to continue admin coaching my current students. I've enjoyed working with you recently, and I'd still be happy to answer any specific questions you may have, but I'm afraid I just can't be an effective mentor for the time being.

Obviously this isn't a reflection on you or your efforts so far. I wish you the best of luck should you run for RfA in the future.

Best wishes for your illness, and I hope you're able to recover quickly. Regards,

Juliancolton (talk) 19:55, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for helping me. I'm feeling better now and taking Wiki on again. I really enjoyed working with you too. Hope you find something to help rekindle your wiki-passion. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Neutrality of Article: Margaret Bourke-White
Hello Panyd! You marked Margaret Bourke-White as non-neutral on 28 September 2009, citing the "Early Life" section as the source of the problem.

While the whole article still needs work (which I am slowly tackling, section by section), I attempted to address your issue. When you have a chance, I invite you to take a look. Let me know what you think either on the discussion page or the NPOV Noticeboard - Margaret Bourke-White, as I have nominated/suggested that the neutrality tag can now be removed. Cheers!--Blondtraillite (talk) 00:57, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello Blondtraillite! My apologies for the lateness of my reply. I was very sick for a little while but I'm back now! And I'm sorry but I must disagree with you. With lines like: "Bourke-White's success was due to both her people skills and her technical skills." I simply can't say that this article is neutral. However, as you suggested, I've had a look at it myself and time permitting I'll re-write the sections I think are most in need of assistance. If you have any input along the way please don't hesitate to let me know. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:30, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File: Haven.jpg
Look at this. Sorry about this. -- DC Fan 5 (talk) 17:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If you were attempting to tell me how stupid I was, I completely agree. However, unlike the person who overwrote it after me, I reverted my change as soon as I saw it. I hope that redeems me somewhat. If that wasn't what you were trying to say then you have my apologies. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:09, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Wiki-Conference NYC (2nd annual)
Our 2nd annual Wiki-Conference NYC has been confirmed for the weekend of August 28-29 at New York University.

There's still plenty of time to join a panel, or to propose a lightning talk or an open space session. Register for the Wiki-Conference here. And sign up here for on-wiki notification. All are invited! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 15:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Meetup
It was a pleasure to meet you and discuss philosophy, tattoos and Satre's misogyny :P. Hopefully I'll see you at a meetup in the future! Regards, Ironholds (talk) 04:42, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The feeling is mutual. You guys were so wonderful, it's given me the little boost I needed to get back and get editing again. Hopefully I'll be in London for some time so I'll definitely be there next time. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:15, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Awesome! If you'd like to borrow it or whatnot, I happen to have a copy of Mills's The Subjection of Women lying around. Ironholds (talk) 20:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Ditto to Ironholds comments Nice to see you and R. You were asking about missing pictures? If you fancy a British Museum visit then there are a lot listed here. The last two are of interest to me. Copper Bull recently got 10,000 hits .... but no picture and the last but one even gives a BM map showing where the articles are that are missing articles.... but I'm writing them! Victuallers (talk) 14:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Victuallers! I'm definitely interested in getting stuck in. Got to read up on the licensing a little bit more first though. Very confusing! Excuse my ignorance, I am a little rusty at the moment, but is there anywhere I can go to see a list of articles which need to be written on the British Museum? (Or on anything else for that matter, the request an article section appears to be pretty dead). I want to get properly stuck into DYK but it's very hard to find articles that need to be written with a depth of information available. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:15, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd look here. (If you look closely at the pics then you may see some you met on Sunday.) Down the bottom of the page are some "articles needed". There is also a table mid page that shows which are Top important Start articles. Hope this helps. Victuallers (talk) 20:36, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Scottsdale Centre for the Performing Arts
Okay - a good thing to read is User:Tony1/How to improve your writing - Tony1 has been instrumental in helping alot of us improve our writing skills. Specific facts are better than general ones (eg get exact start year rather than '1970s')

Can you list more works of art in it? Maybe get a book from the library?

More later. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:07, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey there! Thank you very much for the pointers. I couldn't find any other sources for the SCFPA. I'm going to try and re-write what I have in an encyclopic-friendly format. However, I did take a stab at the Lisa Frank Company. Could you let me know what you think please? I've read through the essay, I think I've applied some points, although I mostly think I just need practice. I've got a couple of other articles to put up as drafts soon. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * P.s. I have about 20 sources for the article, I just haven't put them in yet. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry about my non-reply to date - about five seconds after I got a note from you I've been deluged by this, that and the other. Anyway, I will look at the articles. Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * PS: I formatted a reference - using the citation templates is a good way of ensuring refs are formatted. Can be fiddly but looks good and prompts you to add the extra information needed. Also change the all caps headings in refs. Do you want to add more information to the Lisa Frank Company first? Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Panyd, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Panyd/Testing2. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.


 * Shut off the bot here.


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Methal pertiwi
Hi, Panyd. While there's nothing notable here, it's not a real person, individual animal, organisation, or web content; the article appears to be about a comic book, so I've had to decline the speedy deletion. Please send it on to PROD or an AFD if desired. Courcelles 16:47, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for the note. Will do. Thought maybe I could A7 my way into un-notable anything. My mistake. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Sometimes I wish we could A7 this stuff, because there's not a single claim of significance there, much less notability. But, the area we're allowed to A7 without being summarily overturned at DRV is rather narrow. Courcelles 16:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Admin Coaching...
I have started the page for this at User:Panyd/Admin Mentoring - welcome to the programme! --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 21:41, 30 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Big hint on earning kudos points and helping the 'pedia --> see folks who've listed articles at Peer review, all would be insanely grateful for any feedback to help them improve an article. This page is undervisited and stuff often sits here awhile, and often gets taken underprepared to WP:GAN and WP:FAC which is a burden on those processes. even scanning once in a while - see a technical topic you don't understand? Point out to the nominator to improve accessibility. Any content missing? Again, let a nominator know/ Copyediting, weird sentences, POV whatever, just offering suggestions to articles here, and keeping it positive and forward-looking, would be a great thing to do. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Just like to say thank you to both of you! Just a quick question for Casilber, is this the right way to go about reviewing things? PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep, that looks to be a great start. I often list issues in point form for navigation and allows for easier crossing off once addressed (NB: You not the writer whould be the one crossing yours off :)) ...and always keep it upbeat and postive, and if you can add info as well and pick up typos..all the better :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Peer review/Huron Tract/archive1
Hi there, Thanks so much for the review...you have some great ideas which I will work on. However still being a bit new to Wikipedia, I don't really know what a photo gallery is. Can you give me an example that I can work from? That would be terrific. CJ_WeißSchäfer 12:30, 7 September 2010 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CJ3370 (talk • contribs)
 * No problem! You can find an example of one here, and if you click edit you'll see that the code is really easy. Shouldn't be a problem even for a beginner. Hope you keep up the good work on that article! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Hay there! I've been working on your review. If you have a few moments could you give it another look and see if I've caught the spirit of what you had in mind. Thanks CJ_WeißSchäfer 23:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CJ3370 (talk • contribs)

RfA thanks spam


Hello Panyd, thank you for supporting my RfA! I was promoted with a final tally of 65/4/3. I hope I can live up to everyone's expectations, do my best for Wikipedia, and take to heart the constructive criticism. Always feel free to message me if I'm around. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Greetings!
Hiho. WilliamH (talk) 16:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Follow up
Hi Panyd, nice to meet you at the Oak, hope to see you and Chase me Ladies at future meetups. The collaborative project I mentioned was Unreferenced BLP Rescue.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  13:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Panyd, thanks
...For the lovely support vote in my RfA. I noted the words you wrote and promise I'll watch my CSD reviews pretty much more carefully from now on. Sincere regards and thanks again.  Wifione    .......  Leave a message  15:51, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Sterling Jewelers
Might want to take a closer look. There are tons of hits on Google News for Kay Jewelers and JB Robinson Jewelers, their two main brands. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 00:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Your questions on my RfA
Hello! I'm there to inform you, that I have answered your questions on my RfA. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  04:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)