User talk:PapaJeckloy/Archive 5

Unblock request

 * I would like to point out that it has been only three weeks—21 days—since PapaJeckloy was blocked. Not "almost a month", or 23 days; even now, the request is guilty of exaggerating, and the admitted socks above were being vociferously denied right up until the original block occurred. Given the damage PapaJeckloy did at both DYK and GAN—he used his socks at the former to approve his own articles and promoted articles he'd reviewed, both against DYK policty—it's far too soon to let him loose to do anything. If for some reason the block is lifted, I think there at least needs to be restrictions against participating in those areas until PapaJeckloy can demonstrate responsible editing elsewhere. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:05, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I would tend to concur with this. PapaJeckloy not only used socks to approve DYKs, but ultimately caused an article containing a blatant copyvio image to appear on the main page. Should an unblock even be considered, I would strongly advise the admin to make it conditional on accepting a topic ban from DYK, GAN, FAC, and all related processes (especially those where content can be put on the main page). —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 02:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Just to add on BlueMoonset and Mendaliv's comments, the administrator that will check on this case should consider the aggressive/rude behavior he showed to other editors (including myself), on top of what big mess he did in DYK and GA. To Jeckloy, learn to accept criticism and take it positively. For the past months that you have edited here, whenever I correct your grammar, you took it negatively and started attacking me. If someone added information on an article that you are focusing on, you delete it and say rude things on the editor. And please, if you edited an article and nominated it in DYK, you should acknowledge the other editors who painstakingly edited them before you and don't own all of the credits that comes along with it. You showed that behavior to me and others in multiple instances. -WayKurat (talk) 11:15, 4 October 2014 (UTC)