User talk:Papa November/Archive 8

Chatroulette image
Hi. Could you do me a favour and get rid of the chatroulette screenshot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chatroulette_screenshot_(non-free).png) that has my image on it, I've concluded that some people might think it a shade inappropriate that my image is there. I'm not really sure how to go about tagging it for deletion myself. I assume that as I uploaded it I can withdraw my consent for it to be used? cya Coolug (talk) 09:35, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. You can request speedy deletion of pages you create yourself, as long as no one else has edited them substantially.  Just use the CSD option in Twinkle.  If you want to request deletion when the speedy deletion criteria don't apply, then you can use the XFD option in Twinkle and add an explanation of why you think the content should be deleted.  Papa November (talk) 22:55, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Eve songs
Category:Eve songs, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — ξ xplicit  20:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi i'm the person who asked "why can't I put Prog Rock in Radiohead's genres".

I'm going to ask something related to that.

Which is why can't I put "Art Rock" in their genre section either?

Wiki themselves have labeled many Radiohead songs as "Art Rock" which are Karma Police, No Suprises, Pyramid Song, There There, Jigsaw Falling Into Place, Nude, House Of Cards etc.

So that must mean most of Radiohead's songs are "Art Rock" am i correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrRustyCage (talk • contribs) 18:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Radiohead's genre
I've been trying to discuss this subject to no avail. If I can't get anything out of you, then I'll go to the Alternative rock wikiproject's talk page. I have seen Radiohead labeled as an art rock and new prog band both by Wikipedia and other sources. It should be obvious by listening to their material, especially on OK Computer, that they are progressive. Futhermore, they take influence from progressive rock band Pink Floyd. Please respond (and be reasonable). Thank you. Sbrianhicks (talk) 14:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Believe it or not, I really don't have a strong opinion on the genres - I'm happy to go with whatever the consensus is. Whatever happens though, we absolutely cannot add genres just because they are "obvious" from listening to an album.  That constitutes original research, which is forbidden at Wikipedia.  Instead, we can add genres if they are widely accepted by multiple reliable sources, and are not the subject of debate.  In other words, the infobox is for hard, universally-accepted facts.  The cases of art rock and new prog need discussion (either at Talk:Radiohead or WT:ALTROCK).  I am pretty sure there have been both supporting and opposing statements in the music press, so I don't think it's reasonable for us to add it to the infobox. Papa November (talk)
 * I actually have currently two sources saying that the band is a new prog band. Sbrianhicks (talk) 22:13, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Altitude Software page
Hi Papa,

I would like to ask your premission to unprotect the title and post my new version. The article is now at my user space: User:Teresa.jose/Altitude Software. I think it is now OK. If you disagree please let me know what needs to be changed.

Thank you, Teresa.jose (talk) 12:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi there, thanks for rewriting the article. It reads much less like an advertisement now, which is a step in the right direction.  Unfortunately, the article still doesn't cite any independent sources. (e.g. newspaper/magazine articles written by someone unconnected to the company).  The main objective here is to demonstrate that the company is well-known and that people consider it important enough to write about it.  Take a look at the notability guidelines for more help. Papa November (talk) 13:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Misunderstanding
Just wanted to let you know to check the Alternative Wikiproject page about Pablo Honey, there seems to have been a misunderstanding. Thanks. Sbrianhicks (talk) 23:30, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Hotel Echo Lima Lima Oscar
Names on wikipedia are getting more and more creative. Wikipedia is becoming more and more like The Culture every day. (See also: List of ships (The Culture) ) --Kim Bruning (talk) 12:53, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Funnily enough, it's not my real name. P. N. are the initials of a nickname I once had :-)  Papa November (talk) 13:58, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Survey Questions
Hi Papa, I am a PhD student from the Carnegie Mellon University. I am interested in the Wikipedia community, especially the group mechanism of collaboration of the week. I noticed that you have participated in WikiProject Alternative Music’s collaborations before. Could you please take several minutes to answer the following questions if possible? Thanks for your help!

Q1. How many times (approximately) have you participated in Alternative Music Collaboration of the Week?

Q2. How much do you learn from participating in Alternative Music Collaboration of the Week? A. A lot; B. A little bit; C. Not at all (please skip Q3 if you choose C)

Q3. What did you learn from participating in Alternative Music Collaboration of the Week? Please provide examples if possible.

Q4. Do you have any negative experience of Alternative Music Collaboration of the Week?

Q5. What do you think are some of the reasons for Wikiproject Alternative Music's cancellation of collaboration of the week?

You could leave your answers either in your or my talk page if possible. Thanks for your time! We have the same goal to make Wikipedia a better place.

Cheers --Haiyizhu (talk) 20:23, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Main page appearance
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on March 25, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/March 25, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director,. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tb hotch * ۩ ۞ 05:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

 

Radiohead are an English alternative rock band from Abingdon, Oxfordshire, formed in 1985. The band consists of Thom Yorke (vocals, guitars, piano), Jonny Greenwood (guitars, keyboards, other instruments), Ed O'Brien (guitars, backing vocals), Colin Greenwood (bass, synthesizers) and Phil Selway (drums, percussion). Radiohead released their first single, "Creep", in 1992. The song was initially unsuccessful, but it became a worldwide hit several months after the release of their debut album, Pablo Honey (1993). Radiohead's third album, OK Computer (1997), propelled them to greater international fame. Featuring an expansive sound and themes of modern alienation, OK Computer is often acclaimed as a landmark record of the 1990s. Radiohead's work has appeared in a large number of listener polls and critics' lists. While the band's earlier albums were influential on British rock and pop music, musicians in a wide variety of genres have been influenced by their later work. The New York Times described Radiohead as "the world's biggest art band." (more...)

File:10.1.10HumanCentipedeByLuigiNovi.jpg
Hello. Would you be able to help me out by giving your expert opinion on the use of this picture in the FAC thingy? If you don't agree that it's 100% ok to use this picture then do say so, I'd rather have to find a new picture than potentially fail the FA review. Cya Coolug (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Drum and bass, discussion
Could you check out what I wrote at the discussion page of Talk:Drum and bass. Could you just make sure that every thing I said is in line with what should be, and if I have all my boxes checked. Thanks! I appreciate it. BTW, it's in the talk page under, I think I named it, Quotes, history; or something like that. Thanks again. Lighthead (talk) 19:54, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Wow, thanks for helping me out! Your insight was really useful. Like I said, thanks! Lighthead (talk) 19:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the lack of response. I have next to no knowledge about D&B I'm afraid.  Your question is a bit vague... I'm really not sure what help I can offer with this! Papa November (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

I was just looking for advice from someone more knowledgeable, really. But if you're too busy doing other things, maybe you should give up being an administrator. I mean I know shouldn't have been so nasty (present tense as well..), but being here over the years, I guess I'm just fed up with Uncle Wiki and his kids. Lighthead (talk) 23:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Why not have a nice cup of tea? Papa November (talk) 00:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Okay Papa November, what kind of tea would you suggest? What kind of tea scares away people who ignore you, and what kind of tea calms down people who are angry? Lighthead (talk) 01:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

oops
hello, a confession, I just accidentally undid someones recent edit to your talk page when I was trying to look at my watchlist on my htc phone (never try and do anything on wikipedia on a 3 inch screen!) Have rolled myself back so all is as it was, sorry! Coolug (talk) 21:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

thc fac continues
hey, any thoughts? Coolug (talk) 20:43, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Catégorie de photo
Bonjour Papa November. Je t'écris en français car c'est plus simple pour moi. Je viens de catégoriser toutes les photos de chaires sur Commons par pays, sauf une File:Pulpit.JPG que tu as déposée. Peux-tu la catégoriser ? Merci d'avance. Père Igor (d) 10:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Père Igor (talk • contribs)
 * EN: Hi! I'm afraid I didn't take the photo originally - I just transferred it from Wikipedia to Commons, so I'm not really sure of the location.  The original author was KF, so it might be worth asking him for advice.  Thanks Papa November (talk) 23:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * FR (mauvais!): Bonjour. S'il vous plaît excuser mon mauvais Français! Je regrete, ce n'est pas vraiment ma photo... j'ai seulement copié de Wikipedia a Commons.  L'auteur originale etait KF.  C'est possible il peut vous aider?  Merci, Papa November (talk) 23:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:White Whale albums
Category:White Whale albums, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

THCTFARXYZ......
hello. It's been eleven whole minutes since you fixed those links (not that I'm constantly watching the page or anything) - thanks but are you going to support it too? :) Coolug (talk) 11:39, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * You're not canvassing, are you? :p Anyway - refresh your watchlist for a pleasant surprise. Papa November (talk) 11:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I actually laughed out loud at this one, I always wished my parents had stayed together when I was a child but not quite like that...... Coolug (talk) 11:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Main page appearance: The Human Centipede (First Sequence)
This is a note to let the main editors of The Human Centipede (First Sequence) know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on October 31, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/October 31, 2011. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director or his delegate, or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:



The Human Centipede (First Sequence) is a 2010 Dutch body horror film written and directed by Tom Six. The film tells the story of a German doctor who kidnaps three tourists and joins them surgically, mouth to anus, forming a "human centipede". It stars Dieter Laser as the villain, Dr. Heiter, with Ashley C. Williams, Ashlynn Yennie, and Akihiro Kitamura as his victims. According to Six, the concept of the film arose from a joke he made with friends about punishing child molesters by stitching their mouths to the anus of a "fat truck driver." Six also stated that inspiration for the film came from Nazi medical experiments carried out during World War II, such as the actions of Josef Mengele at Auschwitz concentration camp. When approaching investors prior to filming, Six did not mention the mouth-to-anus aspect of the plot, fearing it would put off potential backers. The financiers of The Human Centipede did not discover the full nature of the film until it was complete. The film received mixed reviews from mainstream film critics, but it won several accolades at international film festivals. The film was released in the United States on a limited release theatrically on 30 April. A sequel, The Human Centipede 2 (Full Sequence), also written and directed by Six, was released in 2011. (more...) UcuchaBot (talk) 00:01, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations on receiving the Dr. Heiter Award!


Hi there, thank you for your contributions to The Human Centipede (First Sequence). When the article was first started in October 2009 is was but a tiny stub that was | immediately tagged for deletion, but thanks to the efforts of wikipedia editors that tiny acorn has grown into a great oak tree of an article. The Human Centipede (First Sequence) is now a Featured Article and on the 17th June 2010 the article received its 1,000,000th page view! The article routinely receives over five thousand views a day and is in the top 1,000 most viewed Wikipedia articles!

On Halloween 2011, the article was the Main Page Featured Article!

The Dr. Heiter Award was created to reward editors who have made positive contributions to the article. It can be presented by any wikipedia user to anyone who has helped the article grow. This might be by adding new content, fixing any errors or reverting vandalism.

Thanks! Feed! Coolug (talk) 17:40, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Cheers intro logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Cheers intro logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 05:05, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:ILoveLucyTitleScreen.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ILoveLucyTitleScreen.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please remove the tag.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 05:05, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Discussion on linking to streamed copies of albums
Wikipedia policy allows us to link to legal streamed copies of albums. It would be useful to draw up a guideline on how and when to link to such albums; however, there is concern that it may not be appropriate as the music would not be available in all parts of the world. Is the benefit of having access to the music for most users outweighed by the fact that some users will follow a link to find the music is not playable in their region? Your view would be helpful at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums.  SilkTork   ✔Tea time  01:50, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Leeds University logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Leeds University logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Wiki markup help
I was wondering if you could help me with my talk page. I would like to keep the Archive box at the bottom, so that new posts are always placed above it. Is there a way to persistently float it at the bottom so that users and bots will have their comments appear above it, by default. People seem to have a hard time reading my markup comments telling them where to write... Also, is there a convenient way to have a link in my signiture to automatically place a talkback? I can understand what the basic syntax of a URL that would add something to my talk page should be, but I'm not sure how to dynamically add the other user's name. Thanks in advance, I appreciate it. Fortheloveofbacon (talk) 11:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi! I'm afraid I'm probably not the best person to ask about this... I've never really done any advanced markup stuff.  I guess your best bet is probably to ask at the help desk or to stick the helpme template on your talk page.  Hope you find an answer to your questions! Papa November (talk) 17:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Will do. Thanks anyway. Fortheloveofbacon (talk) 07:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview
Dear Papa November,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:
 * Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
 * Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
 * All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
 * All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
 * The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.206.39 (talk) 03:47, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MAG logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:MAG logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 05:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Scattering mechanisms
Template:Scattering mechanisms has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. RockMagnetist (talk) 18:53, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Newport coat of arms.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Newport coat of arms.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:26, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IEEE-Sensors-Journal-cover-v12-n4.png
 Thanks for uploading File:IEEE-Sensors-Journal-cover-v12-n4.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:20, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IEEE-Sensors-Journal-cover-v12-n4.png
 Thanks for uploading File:IEEE-Sensors-Journal-cover-v12-n4.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Permission to use figure in a book.
Dear Papa November,

I am working with Prof. Steven LaValle to help obtain permissions for borrowing figures or pictures in his upcoming book Virtual Reality, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The book is online here:

http://vr.cs.uiuc.edu/

We are hoping to include the picture of yours (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Ames_room.svg) in this book (Chapter 6, Figure 6.10b). Could we please have your permission for this? Thank you.

Please contact me at awarkoczewski@yahoo.com

Sincerely,

Adam Warkoczewski — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.8.91.93 (talk) 07:30, 22 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Fine by me, although it's a derivative (sort of) of File:Ames room.JPG Papa November (talk) 17:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IEEE-Sensors-Journal-cover-v12-n4.png
 Thanks for uploading File:IEEE-Sensors-Journal-cover-v12-n4.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Most Holy Church of God in Christ Jesus for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Most Holy Church of God in Christ Jesus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Most Holy Church of God in Christ Jesus& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alephb (talk) 20:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music as a participant of WP:WikiProject Electronic music. - The   Magnificentist  13:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Valeri Borzov.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Valeri Borzov.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ILoveLucyTitleScreen.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ILoveLucyTitleScreen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)