User talk:Papardilas

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Genesis creation narrative. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genesis_creation_narrative&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. N o f o rmation Talk  23:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

ok sorry. i remebler that just replace some words, anyway thx. --Papardilas (talk) 23:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC) ok thx, i re-edit it, with a reason, i have not delete words God this time. --Papardilas (talk) 23:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Sorry
I had to revert you again because I can't make sense of what that sentence is trying to say. N o f o rmation Talk  23:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

-

i said, Elohim "God" is the common name in English for Elohim replace, the original work is Elohim.

I Mean that the world is Elohim, not God, Just the most people said this God after the ancient translate from hubrew to ancient greek. Original Hebrew = Elohim. Original Greek = God.

2 different means, am not a translater to say what is the mean,

The right word is Elohim, Thats i want to tell in artice. i re-edit again, if you dont agree tell it to me. --Papardilas (talk) 23:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi again. I'm sorry but I am going to revert you one more time. Instead of editing it again, would you be willing to discuss what you're trying to do on the Talk:Adam talk page? I'm still not really sure what exactly you are saying based on what you wrote above, so please start a new section on the Adam talk page and perhaps some other editors can help out. Thanks! N o f o rmation Talk  23:32, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Lamashtu. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)