User talk:PaperGoldFish

Welcome!
Hello, PaperGoldFish, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Finngall  talk  16:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition


A tag has been placed on UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Finngall  talk  16:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi there. Thanks for the welcome to Wikipedia. I do also really appreciate the work the editors and Admins do keeping Wikipedia free from junk! I do want to contest the Speedy deletion of this article. It is true that it is an article about an organisation, and that it therefore must be an organization notable enough to warrant an entry in Wikipedia. I do also accept that at the point of deletion there was not sufficient information in article to justify the entry. However, I had not anticipated the speed at which the speedy deletion would take place (the name should have been a give away I guess). I had reviewed the criteria determining notoriety and felt that the organization justified an entry. I had also looked through how such notoriety can be explained in the article. My plan was to return to the article the next day and make edits doing this. My plan was to add reference to a number of publications produced, media coverage and recognition from other institutions. I also planned to make edits further emphasising the fact that it is the only organization of its type.  I should have said this in the talk section of the page - but because I'm new I didn't. For these reasons I am requesting that the speedy deletion is revoked and that I have a chance to make the proposed edits that I believe make the entry worthwhile. PaperGoldFish (talk) 18:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest
Hello, PaperGoldFish. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
 * instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the template);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Last but not least: All contributors must not contribute content that violates conflict of interest laws (just as all contributors must respect copyright). The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive is valid throughout the European Union. In a German court decision in 2012 (that also relied on the directive) regarding Wikipedia: "The court held that when a company edits a Wikipedia article, the resulting text falsely creates the impression that the edit has no business-related purpose. By implication, the judges found that the average reader of Wikipedia articles expects to find objective and neutral information." That is a very very important condition, comparable to the FTC Guide" that consumers are likely to believe reflects the opinions, beliefs, findings, or experience of a party other than the sponsoring advertiser”. This expectation by consumers of neutral information on Wikipedia, requires that companies not write "their" WP articles for PR/marketing purposes.

Editors who are compensated for their contributions should make the disclosure by placing the  template at the top of the talk page of affected articles and filling in the parameters. They should also supply this information as part of a list on their user page of all their paid contributions.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi there, thanks for pointing me to the relevant sections on conflicts / paid contributions. In the talk section I did fully explain my relationship to the organization about which I created a page. In the talk section I explained that I am employed by the charity, and in that capacity I created the page. I acknowledged this fully in my discosure. What I didn't do - and you are absolutely right to point out - was add the appropriate tags in the main page showing my affiliation. I hope you can accept that this was because I'm new to Wikipedia, rather than trying to hide anything. I hope the fact that I was very clear about my interest in the talk section is evidence of this. The article has also been removed under Speedy Deletion. I've added comments separately contesting this. If the article is re-instated, I will of course properly show my affiliation using the right tags in the article. PaperGoldFish (talk) 20:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Paid Editing
I noticed that you states that you were paid and you created the article. If you are being paid to create and/or maintain the article, then you must -repeat MUST - read through and act on all points listed at Paid-contribution disclosure. Otherwise, this account runs the risk of being summarily blocked. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Userfied
In response to your request on my page I have restored the article in question and "userfied" it - by which I mean that I have moved it to your userspace so that you can work on and improve the article without having to worry about the material being summarily deleted. You can find the restored content at User:PaperGoldFish/UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition. When you are read to to publish the material, I recommend that you go through the articles for creation process to get the material checked prior to moving it back out into the main space. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi there, thanks for your help with this. I've continued editing the article in Userfied space you created for it. I've improved article in various ways. As you suggested I am going through the articles for creation process. As part of this process I have moved it from my userfied ares to a 'drafts' page. This is what the process recommended (hope that's the right thing). I've also added the relevent tags that explain my relationship to the organization. Thanks again for your help. PaperGoldFish (talk) 18:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I've fixed the template disclosing your paid editing, so it should put the article in the relevant category for paid editing contributions. As far as the relevant policy for paid editing is concerned, you are fully disclosed and as such should not have issues with this article vis-a-vis being a paid editor. Do note though that if you are paid to create or edit other articles here those will need to be disclosed as well, so take care to track your paid editing contributions. As for the move to the draft space, that is fine - and in fairness the article would have ended up there sooner or later since that is as you noted the preferred process for how an article moves out into the mainspace. The only issue now that I see that you could get in trouble with is the use of copyrighted material, and since you've disclosed your status as paid editor I would recommend reading Copyrights and Copyright violations to make sure you're familiar with the policy and how it related to your group and the page you have here just to be safe. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:38, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition (November 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UK_Climate_Change_and_Migration_Coalition Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UK_Climate_Change_and_Migration_Coalition reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  08:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition (December 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UK_Climate_Change_and_Migration_Coalition Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LaMona&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UK_Climate_Change_and_Migration_Coalition reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 15:49, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition (December 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CatcherStorm was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UK_Climate_Change_and_Migration_Coalition Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CatcherStorm&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:UK_Climate_Change_and_Migration_Coalition reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 CatcherStorm    talk   07:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition


Hello, PaperGoldFish. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Logo of the UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition.jpg


The file File:Logo of the UK Climate Change and Migration Coalition.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 07:42, 4 January 2019 (UTC)